CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 2Complex Network Analysis TechniquesContemporary Social and Educational IssuesComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis

Do the Young Live in a "Smaller World" Than the Old? Age-Specific Degrees of Separation in Human Communication

Open access
Dong, Yuxiao, Lizardo, Omar, Chawla, Nitesh V.·2016·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1606.07556arXiv 1606.07556
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the phenomenon of "age-specific small worlds" using data from a large-scale mobile communication network approximating interaction patterns at societal scale. Rather than asking whether two random individuals are separated by a small number of links, we ask whether individuals in specific age groups live in a small world in relation to individuals from other age groups. Our analysis shows that there is systematic variation in this age-relative small world effect. Young people live in the "smallest world," being separated from other young people and their parent's generation via a smaller number of intermediaries than older individuals. The oldest people live in the "least small world," being separated from their same age peers and their younger counterparts by a larger number of intermediaries. Variation in the small world effect is specific to age as a node attribute (being absent in the case of gender) and is consistently observed under several data robustness checks. The discovery of age-specific small worlds is consistent with well-known social mechanisms affecting the way age interacts with network connectivity and the relative prevalence of kin ties and non-kin ties observed in this network. This social pattern has significant implications for our understanding of generation-specific dynamics of information cascades, diffusion phenomena, and the spread of fads and fashions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1606.07556

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dong et al. found age-specific social network distances, with younger people being better connected than older generations.

    “Dong et al. (2016) found age-specific social network distances (“degrees of separation”), with younger people being better connected than older generations.”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Dong et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [2]2. Watts, D. J. Small worlds: the dynamics of networks between order and randomness (Princeton university press, 1999).
  2. [7]7. Eagle, N., Pentland, A. S. & Lazer, D. Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 , 15274-15278 (2009).
  3. [8]8. Onnela, J. P. et al. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 , 7332-7336 (2007).
  4. [9]9. Leskovec, J. & Horvitz, E. Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web , 915924 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2008).
  5. [10]10. Backstrom, L., Boldi, P., Rosa, M., Ugander, J. & Vigna, S. Four degrees of separation. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference , 33-42 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2012).
  6. [12]12. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. & Cook, J. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology 415-444 (2001).
  7. [15]15. Kovanen, L., Kaski, K., Kert´ esz, J. & Saram¨ aki, J. Temporal motifs reveal homophily, gender-specific patterns, and group talk in call sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 , 18070-18075 (2013).
  8. [16]16. Blumenstock, J. & Eagle, N. Mobile divides: Gender, socioeconomic status, and mobile phone use in rwanda. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development , 6:1-6:10 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2010).
  9. [17]17. Dong, Y., Yang, Y., Tang, J., Yang, Y. & Chawla, N. V. Inferring user demographics and social strategies in mobile social networks. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 15-24 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2014).
  10. [18]18. Parsons, T. Age and sex in the social structure of the united states. American sociological review 604-616 (1942).
  11. [22]22. Marsden, P. V. Core discussion networks of americans. American sociological review 122-131 (1987).
  12. [24]24. Goode, W. J. World revolution and family patterns. (Free Press Glencoe, 1963).
  13. [25]25. Cornwell, B., Laumann, E. O. & Schumm, L. P. The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. American Sociological Review 73 , 185-203 (2008).
  14. [26]26. Antonucci, T. C. & Akiyama, H. Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model. Journal of Gerontology 42 , 519-527 (1987).
  15. [27]27. Le Play, F. Frederic Le Play on Family, Work, and Social Change (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982).
  16. [28]28. Ruggles, S. The decline of intergenerational coresidence in the united states, 1850 to 2000. American sociological review 72 , 964-989 (2007).
  17. [31]31. Munch, A., McPherson, J. M. & Smith-Lovin, L. Gender, children, and social contact: The effects of childrearing for men and women. American Sociological Review 509520 (1997).
  18. [35]35. Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthelemy, M. & Stanley, H. E. Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97 , 11149-11152 (2000).
  19. [37]37. Deville, P. et al. Scaling identity connects human mobility and social interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 201525443 (2016).
  20. [38]38. Deville, P. et al. Dynamic population mapping using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 , 15888-15893 (2014).
  21. [40]40. Moore, C. & Newman, M. E. Epidemics and percolation in small-world networks. Physical Review E 61 , 5678 (2000).
  22. [43]43. Danigelis, N. L., Hardy, M. & Cutler, S. J. Population aging, intracohort aging, and sociopolitical attitudes. American Sociological Review 72 , 812-830 (2007).
  23. [44]44. Leskovec, J., Kleinberg, J. & Faloutsos, C. Graphs over time: Densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining , KDD '05, 177-187 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2005).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, Y., Lizardo, O., & Chawla, N. V.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1606.07556
arXiv
1606.07556
OpenAlex
W2762930794
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2020: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1229450, 1447795, W911NF-09-2-0053)
  • Army Research Laboratory (W911NF, W911NF-09-2-0053)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Social and Educational Issues
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Keywords
small-world networks, intergenerational communication, cellular networks, kinship ties, information dissemination, information cascades, generational dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review