CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 48,960Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Densely Connected Convolutional Networks

Open access
Huang, Gao, Liu, Zhuang, van der Maaten, Laurens, Weinberger, Kilian Q.·2016·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1608.06993arXiv 1608.06993
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Recent work has shown that convolutional networks can be substantially deeper, more accurate, and efficient to train if they contain shorter connections between layers close to the input and those close to the output. In this paper, we embrace this observation and introduce the Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet), which connects each layer to every other layer in a feed-forward fashion. Whereas traditional convolutional networks with L layers have L connections - one between each layer and its subsequent layer - our network has L(L+1)/2 direct connections. For each layer, the feature-maps of all preceding layers are used as inputs, and its own feature-maps are used as inputs into all subsequent layers. DenseNets have several compelling advantages: they alleviate the vanishing-gradient problem, strengthen feature propagation, encourage feature reuse, and substantially reduce the number of parameters. We evaluate our proposed architecture on four highly competitive object recognition benchmark tasks (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, SVHN, and ImageNet). DenseNets obtain significant improvements over the state-of-the-art on most of them, whilst requiring less computation to achieve high performance. Code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/liuzhuang13/DenseNet .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1608.06993

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNNs have grown due in part to their success in many challenging image classification problems, surpassing methods relying on hand-crafted features.

    “the use of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has grown due in part to their success in many challenging image classification problems [15-19], surpassing methods relying on hand-crafted features”

    From EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces (2018) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction describes CNNs as the dominant approach to visual object recognition, and the Conclusion reports state-of-the-art results on competitive classification datasets. These passages support the broad point about CNNs’ success, but our copy does not establish that their use grew because of that success or that they surpassed methods relying on hand-crafted features. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • YOLO is a popular single stage detector, which has been improved continuously.

    “YOLO (You Only Look Once) [135] is a popular single stage detector, which has been improved continuously [128], [136].”

    From A Survey of Autonomous Driving: <i>Common Practices and Emerging Technologies</i> (2020) · cites this paper as [128]

    The Introduction and Conclusion discuss DenseNet and visual object recognition, not YOLO. Searches for “YOLO,” “You Only Look Once,” and “single-stage object detection” found no passage in our copy addressing YOLO’s popularity, detector type, or continued improvement. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • More recent versions of YOLO, YOLOv2, YOLO9000 and YOLOv3 briefly took over the PASCAL VOC and MS COCO benchmarks while maintaining low computation and memory cost.

    “More recent versions of this method, YOLOv2, YOLO9000 [136] and YOLOv3 [128] briefly took over the PASCAL VOC and MS COCO benchmarks while maintaining low computation and memory cost.”

    From A Survey of Autonomous Driving: <i>Common Practices and Emerging Technologies</i> (2020) · cites this paper as [128]

    The Datasets section (4.1) and the results tables in the Conclusion report DenseNet results on CIFAR, SVHN, and ImageNet. Searches for YOLOv2, YOLO9000, YOLOv3, PASCAL VOC, and MS COCO found no passage addressing the attributed benchmark or cost claims. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 61 · Cited by 48,960

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. C. Cortes, X. Gonzalvo, V. Kuznetsov, M. Mohri, and S. Yang. Adanet: Adaptive structural learning of artificial neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.01097, 2016. 2 · arXiv
  2. J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei- Fei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In CVPR, 2009. 5
  3. S. E. Fahlman and C. Lebiere. The cascade-correlation learn- ing architecture. In NIPS, 1989. 2
  4. J. R. Gardner, M. J. Kusner, Y. Li, P. Upchurch, K. Q. Weinberger, and J. E. Hopcroft. Deep manifold traversal: Changing labels with convolutional features. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06421, 2015. 8 · arXiv
  5. X. Glorot, A. Bordes, and Y. Bengio. Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In AISTATS, 2011. 3
  6. I. Goodfellow, D. Warde-Farley, M. Mirza, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio. Maxout networks. In ICML, 2013. 5
  7. B. Hariharan, P. Arbeláez, R. Girshick, and J. Malik. Hyper- columns for object segmentation and fine-grained localiza- tion. In CVPR, 2015. 2
  8. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. In ICCV, 2015. 5
  9. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Identity mappings in deep residual networks. In ECCV, 2016. 2, 3, 5, 7
  10. G. Huang, Y. Sun, Z. Liu, D. Sedra, and K. Q. Weinberger. Deep networks with stochastic depth. In ECCV, 2016. 1, 2, 5, 8
  11. S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In ICML, 2015. 3
  12. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In NIPS, 2012. 3, 7
  13. G. Larsson, M. Maire, and G. Shakhnarovich. Fractalnet: Ultra-deep neural networks without residuals. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.07648, 2016. 1, 3, 5, 6 · arXiv
  14. Y. LeCun, B. Boser, J. S. Denker, D. Henderson, R. E. Howard, W. Hubbard, and L. D. Jackel. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural compu- tation, 1(4):541-551, 1989. 1
  15. Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner. Gradient- based learning applied to document recognition. Proceed- ings of the IEEE, 86(11):2278-2324, 1998. 1, 3
  16. C.-Y. Lee, S. Xie, P. Gallagher, Z. Zhang, and Z. Tu. Deeply- supervised nets. In AISTATS, 2015. 2, 3, 5, 7
  17. Q. Liao and T. Poggio. Bridging the gaps between residual learning, recurrent neural networks and visual cortex. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.03640, 2016. 2 · arXiv
  18. M. Lin, Q. Chen, and S. Yan. Network in network. In ICLR, 2014. 3, 5
  19. J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In CVPR, 2015. 2
  20. Y. Netzer, T. Wang, A. Coates, A. Bissacco, B. Wu, and A. Y. Ng. Reading digits in natural images with unsupervised fea- ture learning, 2011. In NIPS Workshop, 2011. 5
  21. M. Pezeshki, L. Fan, P. Brakel, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio. Deconstructing the ladder network architecture. In ICML, 2016. 3
  22. G. Pleiss, D. Chen, G. Huang, T. Li, L. van der Maaten, and K. Q. Weinberger. Memory-efficient implementation of densenets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06990, 2017. 5 · arXiv
  23. A. Rasmus, M. Berglund, M. Honkala, H. Valpola, and T. Raiko. Semi-supervised learning with ladder networks. In NIPS, 2015. 3
  24. A. Romero, N. Ballas, S. E. Kahou, A. Chassang, C. Gatta, and Y. Bengio. Fitnets: Hints for thin deep nets. In ICLR, 2015. 5
  25. O. Russakovsky, J. Deng, H. Su, J. Krause, S. Satheesh, S. Ma, Z. Huang, A. Karpathy, A. Khosla, M. Bernstein, et al. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. IJCV. 1, 7
  26. P. Sermanet, S. Chintala, and Y. LeCun. Convolutional neu- ral networks applied to house numbers digit classification. In ICPR, pages 3288-3291. IEEE, 2012. 5
  27. P. Sermanet, K. Kavukcuoglu, S. Chintala, and Y. LeCun. Pedestrian detection with unsupervised multi-stage feature learning. In CVPR, 2013. 2
  28. J. T. Springenberg, A. Dosovitskiy, T. Brox, and M. Ried- miller. Striving for simplicity: The all convolutional net. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6806, 2014. 5 · arXiv
  29. N. Srivastava, G. E. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. JMLR, 2014. 6
  30. R. K. Srivastava, K. Greff, and J. Schmidhuber. Training very deep networks. In NIPS, 2015. 1, 2, 5
  31. I. Sutskever, J. Martens, G. Dahl, and G. Hinton. On the importance of initialization and momentum in deep learning. In ICML, 2013. 5
  32. C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke, and A. Rabinovich. Going deeper with convolutions. In CVPR, 2015. 2, 3
  33. C. Szegedy, V. Vanhoucke, S. Ioffe, J. Shlens, and Z. Wojna. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In CVPR, 2016. 2, 3, 4
  34. S. Targ, D. Almeida, and K. Lyman. Resnet in resnet: Generalizing residual architectures. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.08029, 2016. 2 · arXiv
  35. J. Wang, Z. Wei, T. Zhang, and W. Zeng. Deeply-fused nets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.07716, 2016. 3 · arXiv
  36. B. M. Wilamowski and H. Yu. Neural network learning without backpropagation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Net- works, 21(11):1793-1803, 2010. 2
  37. S. Yang and D. Ramanan. Multi-scale recognition with dag- cnns. In ICCV, 2015. 2
  38. S. Zagoruyko and N. Komodakis. Wide residual networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.07146, 2016. 3, 5, 6 · arXiv
  39. Y. Zhang, K. Lee, and H. Lee. Augmenting supervised neural networks with unsupervised objectives for large-scale image classification. In ICML, 2016. 3

Authors
Huang, G., Liu, Z., van der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
Pages
2261-2269
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1608.06993
arXiv
1608.06993
OpenAlex
W2963446712
Cited by
48,960
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3321 · 2025: 6056 · 2024: 6925 · 2023: 7252 · 2022: 6921 · 2021: 7034 · 2020: 5482 · 2019: 3903 · 2018: 1775 · 2017: 256 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
898.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1618134, 1149882, 1526012)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61361136003)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2011CBA00301, 61361136003, 2011CBA00300)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-17-1, N00014-17-1-2175, N00014, N00014-17)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
DenseNet, skip connections, gradient vanishing, feature reuse, feature propagation, parameter efficiency, object recognition, image classification, network depth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review