CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 39Mental Health Research TopicsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Network Psychometrics

Open access
Epskamp, Sacha, Maris, Gunter K. J., Waldorp, Lourens J., Borsboom, Denny·2016·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1609.02818arXiv 1609.02818

Preprint — published as 10.1002/9781118489772

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This chapter provides a general introduction of network modeling in psychometrics. The chapter starts with an introduction to the statistical model formulation of pairwise Markov random fields (PMRF), followed by an introduction of the PMRF suitable for binary data: the Ising model. The Ising model is a model used in ferromagnetism to explain phase transitions in a field of particles. Following the description of the Ising model in statistical physics, the chapter continues to show that the Ising model is closely related to models used in psychometrics. The Ising model can be shown to be equivalent to certain kinds of logistic regression models, loglinear models and multi-dimensional item response theory (MIRT) models. The equivalence between the Ising model and the MIRT model puts standard psychometrics in a new light and leads to a strikingly different interpretation of well-known latent variable models. The chapter gives an overview of methods that can be used to estimate the Ising model, and concludes with a discussion on the interpretation of latent variables given the equivalence between the Ising model and MIRT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1609.02818

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 39

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. Aggen, S. H., Neale, M. C., and Kendler, K. S. (2005). DSM criteria for major depression: evaluating symptom patterns using latent-trait item response models. Psychological Medicine , 35(04):475-487.
  2. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis . John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, NY.
  3. Anderson, C. J., Li, Z., and Vermunt, J. (2007). Estimation of models in the rasch family for polytomous items and multiple latent variables. Journal of Statistical Software , 20(6):136.
  4. Anderson, C. J. and Vermunt, J. K. (2000). Log-multiplicative association models as latent variable models for nominal and/or ordinal data. Sociological Methodology , 30(1):81-121.
  5. Anderson, C. J. and Yu, H.-T. (2007). Log-multiplicative association models as item response models. Psychometrika , 72(1):5-23.
  6. Barabási, A.-L. and Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. science , 286(5439):509-512.
  7. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In Lord, F. and Novick, M., editors, Statistical theories of mental test scores . Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  8. Bollen, K. and Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective. Psychological Bulletin , 110(2):305-314.
  9. Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  10. Borsboom, D. and Cramer, A. O. J. (2013). Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual review of clinical psychology , 9:91-121.
  11. Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O. J., Schmittmann, V. D., Epskamp, S., and Waldorp, L. J. (2011). The small world of psychopathology. PloS one , 6(11):e27407.
  12. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., and Van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological review , 110(2):203-219.
  13. Bühlmann, P. (2013). Statistical significance in high-dimensional linear models. Bernoulli , 19(4):1212-1242.
  14. Bühlmann, P. and van de Geer, S. (2011). Statistics for High-Dimensional Data: Methods, Theory and Applications . Springer, New York, NY, USA.
  15. Chalmers, R. P. (2012). mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software , 48(6):1-29.
  16. Chandrasekaran, V., Parrilo, P. A., and Willsky, A. S. (2012). Latent variable graphical model selection via convex optimization (with discussion). The Annals of Statistics , 40(4):1935-1967.
  17. Chen, J. and Chen, Z. (2008). Extended bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. Biometrika , 95(3):759-771.
  18. Costantini, G., Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., Perugini, M., Mõttus, R., Waldorp, L. J., and Cramer, A. O. J. (2015). State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. Journal of Research in Personality , 54:13-29.
  19. Cox, D. R. and Wermuth, N. (1994). A note on the quadratic exponential binary distribution. Biometrika , 81(2):403-408.
  20. Cramer, A. O. J., Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Aggen, S. H., Kendler, K. S., and Borsboom, D. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can't like parties if you don't like people. European Journal of Personality , 26(4):414-431.
  21. Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L., van der Maas, H., and Borsboom, D. (2010). Comorbidity: A Network Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 33(2-3):137-150.
  22. Cressie, N. and Holland, P. W. (1983). Characterizing the manifest probabilities of latent trait models. Psychometrika , 48(1):129-141.
  23. Dryden, I. L., Scarr, M. R., and Taylor, C. C. (2003). Bayesian texture segmentation of weed and crop images using reversible jump markov chain monte carlo methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) , 52(1):31-50.
  24. Edwards, J. and Bagozzi, R. (2000). On the Nature and Direction of Relationships Between Constructs and Measures. Psychological Methods , 5(2):155-174.
  25. Ellis, J. L. and Junker, B. W. (1997). Tail-measurability in monotone latent variable models. Psychometrika , 62(4):495-523.
  26. Epskamp, S., Cramer, A., Waldorp, L., Schmittmann, V. D., and Borsboom, D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software , 48(1):1-18.
  27. Foygel, R. and Drton, M. (2010). Extended Bayesian information criteria for Gaussian graphical models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 23:2020-2028.
  28. Foygel Barber, R. and Drton, M. (2015). High-dimensional Ising model selection with bayesian information criteria. Electronic Journal of Statistics , 9(1):567âĂŞ607.
  29. Fried, E. I., Nesse, R. M., Zivin, K., Guille, C., and Sen, S. (2014). Depression is more than the sum score of its parts: individual DSM symptoms have different risk factors. Psychological medicine , 44(10):2067-2076.
  30. Friedman, J. H., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2008). Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics , 9(3):432-441.
  31. Friedman, J. H., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2010). Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software , 33(1):1-22.
  32. Green, P. J. and Richardson, S. (2002). Hidden markov models and disease mapping. Journal of the American statistical association , 97(460):1055-1070.
  33. Holland, P. W. (1990). The dutch identity: A new tool for the study of item response models. Psychometrika , 55(1):5-18.
  34. Howell, R. D., Breivik, E., and Wilcox, J. B. (2007). Reconsidering formative measurement. Psychological methods , 12(2):205-218.
  35. Ising, E. (1925). Beitrag zur theorie des ferromagnetismus. Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei , 31(1):253-258.
  36. Kolaczyk, E. D. (2009). Statistical analysis of network data . Springer, New York, NY, USA.
  37. Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical models . Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
  38. Lee, S.-I., Lee, H., Abbeel, P., and Ng, A. Y. (2006). Efficient ℓ 1 regularized logistic regression. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume 21, page 401. Menlo Park, CA; Cambridge, MA; London; AAAI Press; MIT Press; 1999.
  39. Lin, K.-Y. (1992). Spontaneous magnetization of the Ising model. Chinese Journal of Physics , 30(3):287-319.
  40. Liu, H., Han, F., Yuan, M., Lafferty, J. D., and Wasserman, L. (2012). High-dimensional semiparametric gaussian copula graphical models. The Annals of Statistics , 40(4):22932326.
  41. Liu, H., Lafferty, J. D., and Wasserman, L. (2009). The nonparanormal: Semiparametric estimation of high dimensional undirected graphs. The Journal of Machine Learning Research , 10:2295-2328.
  42. Liu, Q. and Ihler, A. (2012). Distributed parameter estimation via pseudo-likelihood. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) .
  43. Markus, K. A. and Borsboom, D. (2013). Reflective measurement models, behavior domains, and common causes. New Ideas in Psychology , 31(1):54-64.
  44. Marsman, M., Maris, G., Bechger, T., and Glas, C. (2015). Bayesian inference for low-rank ising networks. Scientific reports , 5(9050):1-7.
  45. McDonald, R. P. (2003). Behavior domains in theory and in practice. Alberta Journal of Educational Research , 49:212-230.
  46. Meinshausen, N. and Bühlmann, P. (2006). High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the lasso. The annals of statistics , pages 1436-1462.
  47. Meinshausen, N., Meier, L., and Bühlmann, P. (2009). P-values for high-dimensional regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 104(488):1671-1681.
  48. Mellenbergh, G. J. (1989). Item bias and item response theory. International Journal of Educational Research , 13(2):127-143.
  49. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika , 58(4):525-543.
  50. Møller, J., Pettitt, A. N., Reeves, R., and Berthelsen, K. K. (2006). An efficient markov chain monte carlo method for distributions with intractable normalising constants. Biometrika , 93(2):451-458.
  51. Mulaik, S. A. and McDonald, R. P. (1978). The effect of additional variables on factor indeterminacy in models with a single common factor. Psychometrika , 43(2):177-192.
  52. Murphy, K. P. (2012). Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective . MIT press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  53. Murray, I. (2007). Advances in Markov chain Monte Carlo methods . PhD thesis, Gatsby Computational neuroscience unit, University College London.
  54. Murray, I., Ghahramani, Z., and MacKay, D. J. C. (2006). MCMC for doubly-intractable distributions. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intellegence (UAI) , pages 359-366. AUAI Press.
  55. Olkin, I. and Tate, R. F. (1961). Multivariate correlation models with mixed discrete and continuous variables. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , 32:448-465.
  56. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference . Cambridge Univ Pr.
  57. Ravikumar, P., Wainwright, M. J., and Lafferty, J. D. (2010). High-dimensional Ising model selection using ℓ 1 -regularized logistic regression. The Annals of Statistics , 38(3):12871319.
  58. Reckase, M. D. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory . Springer, New York, NY, USA.
  59. Reichenbach, H. (1991). The direction of time , volume 65. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  60. Reise, S. P. and Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual review of clinical psychology , 5:27-48.
  61. Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W. A., Brovkin, V., Carpenter, S. R., Dakos, V., Held, H., van Nes, E. H., Rietkerk, M., and Sugihara, G. (2009). Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature , 461(7260):53-59.
  62. Sebastiani, G. and Sørbye, S. H. (2002). A bayesian method for multispectral image data classification. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics , 14(1-2):169-180.
  63. Spearman, C. (1904). "general intelligence," objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology , 15(2):201-292.
  64. Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) , 58:267-288.
  65. van Borkulo, C. D., Borsboom, D., Epskamp, S., Blanken, T. F., Boschloo, L., Schoevers, R. A., and Waldorp, L. J. (2014). A new method for constructing networks from binary data. Scientific reports , 4(5918):1-10.
  66. van de Geer, S., Bühlmann, P., and Ritov, Y. (2013). On asymptotically optimal confidence regions and tests for high-dimensional models. arXiv preprint , page arXiv:1303.0518. · arXiv
  67. van de Leemput, I. A., Wichers, M., Cramer, A. O. J., Borsboom, D., Tuerlinckx, F., Kuppens, P., van Nes, E. H., Viechtbauer, W., Giltay, E. J., Aggen, S. H., Derom, C., Jacobs, N., Kendler, K. S., van der Maas, H. L. J., Neale, M. C., Peeters, F., Thiery, E., Zachar, P., and Scheffer, M. (2014). Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression. 111(1):87-92.
  68. Van Der Maas, H. L., Dolan, C. V., Grasman, R. P., Wicherts, J. M., Huizenga, H. M., and Raijmakers, M. E. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological review , 113(4):842-861.
  69. Wainwright, M. J. and Jordan, M. I. (2008). Graphical models, exponential families, and variational inference. Foundations and Trends R © in Machine Learning , 1(1-2):1-305.
  70. Whittaker, J. (1990). Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics . John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  71. Zhao, L. P. and Prentice, R. L. (1990). Correlated binary regression using a quadratic exponential model. Biometrika , 77(3):642-648.
  72. Zou, H. and Hastie, T. (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) , 67(2):301320.

Authors
Epskamp, S., Maris, G. K. J., Waldorp, L. J., & Borsboom, D.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1609.02818
arXiv
1609.02818
OpenAlex
W4394643499
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
network psychometrics, pairwise Markov random fields, Ising model, binary data, logistic regression, log-linear models, multidimensional item response theory, latent variable models, model estimation, ferromagnetism, phase transitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review