Unsupervised Monocular Depth Estimation with Left-Right Consistency
Open accessAbstract
Learning based methods have shown very promising results for the task of depth estimation in single images. However, most existing approaches treat depth prediction as a supervised regression problem and as a result, require vast quantities of corresponding ground truth depth data for training. Just recording quality depth data in a range of environments is a challenging problem. In this paper, we innovate beyond existing approaches, replacing the use of explicit depth data during training with easier-to-obtain binocular stereo footage. We propose a novel training objective that enables our convolutional neural network to learn to perform single image depth estimation, despite the absence of ground truth depth data. Exploiting epipolar geometry constraints, we generate disparity images by training our network with an image reconstruction loss. We show that solving for image reconstruction alone results in poor quality depth images. To overcome this problem, we propose a novel training loss that enforces consistency between the disparities produced relative to both the left and right images, leading to improved performance and robustness compared to existing approaches. Our method produces state of the art results for monocular depth estimation on the KITTI driving dataset, even outperforming supervised methods that have been trained with ground truth depth.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DeIT-Base-Dist introduces an additional distillation token.
“Note that the DeIT-Base architecture is identical to ViT-Base, while DeIT-Base-Dist introduces an additional distillation token, which we ignore in the Reassemble operation.”
From Vision Transformers for Dense Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
DeIT-Base architecture is identical to ViT-Base.
“Note that the DeIT-Base architecture is identical to ViT-Base, while DeIT-Base-Dist introduces an additional distillation token, which we ignore in the Reassemble operation.”
From Vision Transformers for Dense Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
DeIT trains the ViT architecture with a more data-efficient pretraining procedure.
“DeIT trains the ViT architecture with a more data-efficient pretraining procedure.”
From Vision Transformers for Dense Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 55 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Godard, C., Mac Aodha, O., & Brostow, G. J.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1609.03677
- OpenAlex
- W2949835834
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K015664/1, EP/K023578/1, EP/G037159/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Image Processing Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- monocular depth estimation, unsupervised learning, left-right consistency, stereo disparity, epipolar geometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review