Neural Photo Editing with Introspective Adversarial Networks
Open accessAbstract
The increasingly photorealistic sample quality of generative image models suggests their feasibility in applications beyond image generation. We present the Neural Photo Editor, an interface that leverages the power of generative neural networks to make large, semantically coherent changes to existing images. To tackle the challenge of achieving accurate reconstructions without loss of feature quality, we introduce the Introspective Adversarial Network, a novel hybridization of the VAE and GAN. Our model efficiently captures long-range dependencies through use of a computational block based on weight-shared dilated convolutions, and improves generalization performance with Orthogonal Regularization, a novel weight regularization method. We validate our contributions on CelebA, SVHN, and CIFAR-100, and produce samples and reconstructions with high visual fidelity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GANs allow DeepFakes to generate hyper-realistic content by incorporating audio into the video, altering visual content and making it realistic in terms of audio.
“Taking advantage of more recent AI techniques such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), DeepFakes can now generate hyper-realistic content by incorporating audio into the video, thereby not only altering the visual content but also making it realistic in terms of audio [6].”
From A Comprehensive Review of DeepFake Detection Using Advanced Machine Learning and Fusion Methods (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
The Introduction (p. 1) says GANs produce images with sharp, photorealistic features, and Neural Photo Editing (p. 3) describes convincing changes to facial features. The paper addresses still-image editing, not DeepFakes that incorporate audio into video or make audio realistic. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 27 · Cited by 275
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [4]4. A.M. Saxe, J. L. McClelland, and S. Ganguli. Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networks. In ICLR 2014 , 2014. - C. Szegedy, S. Ioffe, and V. Vanhoucke. Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. arXiv Preprint arXiv: 1602.07261, 2016. · arXiv
- [6]6. The Theano Development Team. Theano: A python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions. arXiv Preprint arXiv: 1605.02688, 2016. - T. White. Sampling generative networks. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1609.04468, 2016. - F. Yu and V. Koltun. Multi-scale context aggregation by dilated convolutions. In ICLR 2016 , 2016. - J. Zhao, M. Mathieu, R. Goroshin, and Y. Lecun. Stacked what-where auto-encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02351 , 2015. · arXiv
- [10]10. J.-Y. Zhu, P. Krähenbuhl, E. Shechtman, and A. A. Efros. Generative visual manipulation on the natural image manifold. In ECCV 2016 , 2016.
- Authors
- Brock, A., Lim, T., Ritchie, J. M., & Weston, N.
- Affiliations
- Renishaw (United Kingdom) (GB)
- ORCID
- Weston, Nick
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1609.07093
- OpenAlex
- W2524985544
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- image editing, orthogonal regularization, weight regularization, dilated convolution, long-range dependencies, generative image models, image reconstruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
