Learning a Probabilistic Latent Space of Object Shapes via 3D Generative-Adversarial Modeling
Open accessAbstract
We study the problem of 3D object generation. We propose a novel framework, namely 3D Generative Adversarial Network (3D-GAN), which generates 3D objects from a probabilistic space by leveraging recent advances in volumetric convolutional networks and generative adversarial nets. The benefits of our model are three-fold: first, the use of an adversarial criterion, instead of traditional heuristic criteria, enables the generator to capture object structure implicitly and to synthesize high-quality 3D objects; second, the generator establishes a mapping from a low-dimensional probabilistic space to the space of 3D objects, so that we can sample objects without a reference image or CAD models, and explore the 3D object manifold; third, the adversarial discriminator provides a powerful 3D shape descriptor which, learned without supervision, has wide applications in 3D object recognition. Experiments demonstrate that our method generates high-quality 3D objects, and our unsupervisedly learned features achieve impressive performance on 3D object recognition, comparable with those of supervised learning methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many works on scene design learn spatial knowledge priors from existing 3D scene databases or leverage user input and refine the 3D scene iteratively.
“Many works on scene design either learn spatial knowledge priors from existing 3D scene databases [4, 31, 49-51, 54, 59] or leverage user input and refine the 3D scene iteratively [3, 5].”
From Holodeck: Language Guided Generation of 3D Embodied AI Environments (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 1,393
- Authors
- Wu, J., Zhang, C., Xue, T., Freeman, W. T., & Tenenbaum, J. B.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology (RU)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1610.07584
- OpenAlex
- W2546066744
- Cited by
- 1,393
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 231 · 2020: 246 · 2019: 279 · 2018: 172 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1231216, 1447476, 1212849)
- Nvidia
- Toyota Research Institute
- Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (N00014-16-1-2007)
- Office of Naval Research (N00014-16-1-2007, MURI #N00014-16-1-2007, N00014)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- 3D generative adversarial networks, 3D object generation, 3D object recognition, unsupervised feature learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review