The DOI matches its DataCite record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adversarial Machine Learning at Scale
Open accessAbstract
Adversarial examples are malicious inputs designed to fool machine learning models. They often transfer from one model to another, allowing attackers to mount black box attacks without knowledge of the target model's parameters. Adversarial training is the process of explicitly training a model on adversarial examples, in order to make it more robust to attack or to reduce its test error on clean inputs. So far, adversarial training has primarily been applied to small problems. In this research, we apply adversarial training to ImageNet. Our contributions include: (1) recommendations for how to succesfully scale adversarial training to large models and datasets, (2) the observation that adversarial training confers robustness to single-step attack methods, (3) the finding that multi-step attack methods are somewhat less transferable than single-step attack methods, so single-step attacks are the best for mounting black-box attacks, and (4) resolution of a "label leaking" effect that causes adversarially trained models to perform better on adversarial examples than on clean examples, because the adversarial example construction process uses the true label and the model can learn to exploit regularities in the construction process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“fully decentralized variants of SGD and other optimization algorithms have recently been considered in machine learning both for improved scalability in datacenters [29] as well as for decentralized networks of devices [127, 459, 443, 59, 278, 291, 173].”
From Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [443]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Takeru Miyato, Shin-ichi Maeda, Masanori Koyama, Ken Nakae, and Shin Ishii. Distributional smoothing with virtual adversarial training. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR2016) , April 2016b.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,004 of 1,004
Estimating Labeling Quality with Deep Object Detectors
Haase-Schütz, C., Hertlein, H., & Wiesbeck, W. (2019) · 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) · doi:10.1109/ivs.2019.8814144 · Cited by 8
Theoretically principled trade-off between robustness and accuracy
Zhang, H., Yu, Y., Jiao, J., Xing, E. P., Ghaoui, L. E., & Jordan, M. I. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.08573 · Cited by 1,560
Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertainty
Hendrycks, D., Mazeika, M., Kadavath, S., & Song, D. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.12340 · Cited by 634
Generating Natural Adversarial Examples
Zhao, Z., Dua, D., & Singh, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.11342 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurakin, A., Goodfellow, I., & Bengio, S.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1611.01236
- OpenAlex
- W2552767274
- Cited by
- 2,325
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 264 · 2023: 259 · 2022: 281 · 2021: 475 · 2020: 447 · 2019: 329 · 2018: 143 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- adversarial training, adversarial examples, adversarial robustness, black-box attacks, transferability, multi-stage attacks, ImageNet, large-scale machine learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review