PreprintCited by 386Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMusic Technology and Sound StudiesMusic and Audio Processing

C-RNN-GAN: Continuous recurrent neural networks with adversarial training

Open access
Mogren, Olof·2016·arXiv

Abstract

Generative adversarial networks have been proposed as a way of efficiently training deep generative neural networks. We propose a generative adversarial model that works on continuous sequential data, and apply it by training it on a collection of classical music. We conclude that it generates music that sounds better and better as the model is trained, report statistics on generated music, and let the reader judge the quality by downloading the generated songs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1611.09904

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many scholars have explored the potential of generative representation learning in time series generation and imputation, such as C-RNN-GAN, TimeGAN, TTS-GAN, and E2GAN.

    “In recent years, many scholars have also explored the potential of generative representation learning in time series generation and imputation, such as C-RNN-GAN [154], TimeGAN [155], TTS-GAN [156], and E 2 GAN[157].”

    From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [154]

    The Introduction (p. 1) identifies C-RNN-GAN as an adversarial model that generates continuous sequences, demonstrated with classical music. This supports citing it as an example of sequence generation, but the paper does not describe time-series imputation or establish it as an imputation method. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • C-RNN-GAN is an early method of generating time series samples using GAN, with an RNN generator and a bidirectional RNN discriminator.

    “C-RNN-GAN [154] is an early method of generating time series samples using GAN. The generator is an RNN, and the discriminator is a bidirectional RNN.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 9 · Cited by 386

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Soumith Chintala Alec Radford, Luke Metz. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2016.
  2. Yoshua Bengio, Patrice Simard, and Paolo Frasconi. Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on , 5(2):157-166, 1994.
  3. Emily L Denton, Soumith Chintala, Rob Fergus, et al. Deep generative image models using a laplacian pyramid of adversarial networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 1486-1494, 2015.
  4. Douglas Eck and Juergen Schmidhuber. Finding temporal structure in music: Blues improvisation with lstm recurrent networks. In Neural Networks for Signal Processing, 2002. Proceedings of the 2002 12th IEEE Workshop on , pages 747-756. IEEE, 2002.
  5. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 2672-2680, 2014.
  6. Alex Graves. Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0850 , 2013. · arXiv
  7. Sepp Hochreiter. The vanishing gradient problem during learning recurrent neural nets and problem solutions. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems , 6(02): 107-116, 1998.
  8. Daniel Jiwoong Im, Chris Dongjoo Kim, Hui Jiang, and Roland Memisevic. Generating images with recurrent adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.05110 , 2016. · arXiv
  9. Tomas Mikolov, Martin Karafiát, Lukas Burget, Jan Cernock` y, and Sanjeev Khudanpur. Recurrent neural network based language model. In Interspeech , volume 2, page 3, 2010.
  10. Pascal Vincent Nicolas Boulanger-Lewandowski, Yoshua Bengio. Modeling temporal dependencies in high-dimensional sequences: Application to polyphonic music generation and transcription. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , page 1159-1166, 2012.
  11. Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Cheung, Alec Radford, and Xi Chen. Improved techniques for training gans. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 2226-2234, 2016.
  12. Jürgen Schmidhuber and Sepp Hochreiter. Long short-term memory. Neural computation , 7(8): 1735-1780, 1997.
  13. Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V Le. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 3104-3112, 2014.
  14. Lantao Yu, Weinan Zhang, Jun Wang, and Yong Yu. Seqgan: Sequence generative adversarial nets with policy gradient. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.05473 , 2016. · arXiv

Authors
Mogren, O.
Corresponding author
Mogren, Olof
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2559110679
Cited by
386
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
generative adversarial networks, adversarial training, music generation, classical music, deep generative models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review