The DOI matches its DataCite record; 8 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Multivariate Industrial Time Series with Cyber-Attack Simulation: Fault Detection Using an LSTM-based Predictive Data Model
Open accessAbstract
We adopted an approach based on an LSTM neural network to monitor and detect faults in industrial multivariate time series data. To validate the approach we created a Modelica model of part of a real gasoil plant. By introducing hacks into the logic of the Modelica model, we were able to generate both the roots and causes of fault behavior in the plant. Having a self-consistent data set with labeled faults, we used an LSTM architecture with a forecasting error threshold to obtain precision and recall quality metrics. The dependency of the quality metric on the threshold level is considered. An appropriate mechanism such as "one handle" was introduced for filtering faults that are outside of the plant operator field of interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Finally, the dataset distribution indicates that sensor-correlation-based methods are heavily evaluated on SWaT, WADI, GHL, HAI, TE, and power-system benchmarks (IEEE bus systems), with additional evidence from gas-pipeline, GRFICSv2/Factory I/O, and aNormalies-based testbeds [88-96,98-102,104-110].”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [89]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Experiencing SAX: A novel symbolic representation of time series
Lin, J., Keogh, E., Wei, L., & Lonardi, S. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-007-0064-z · Cited by 1,618
Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems
Chiang, E. L. R. A. R. D. B. L. H. (2001) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/12/10/706 · Cited by 1,424
Long Short Term Memory Networks for Anomaly Detection in Time Series.
Malhotra, P., Vig, L., Shroff, G. M., & Agarwal, P. (2015) · The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks · Cited by 1,259
LSTM-based Encoder-Decoder for Multi-sensor Anomaly Detection
Malhotra, P., Ramakrishnan, A., Anand, G., Vig, L., Agarwal, P., & Shroff, G. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.00148 · Cited by 819
A Nonparametric Approach for Multiple Change Point Analysis of Multivariate Data
Matteson, D. S., & James, N. A. (2013) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2013.849605 · Cited by 560
Anomaly detection in aircraft data using Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN)
Nanduri, A., & Sherry, L. (2016) · Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS) · doi:10.1109/icnsurv.2016.7486356 · Cited by 248
Anomaly Detection Based on Sensor Data in Petroleum Industry Applications
Martí, L., Sánchez-Pi, N., Molina, J. M., & García, A. C. B. (2015) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s150202774 · Cited by 185
ODE - Augmented Training Improves Anomaly Detection in Sensor Data from MachinesPreprint
Yadav, M., Malhotra, P., Vig, L., Sriram, K., & Shroff, G. M. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.01534 · Cited by 20
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 15:1929-1958, 2014. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/srivastava14a.html .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Robust Anomaly Detection for Multivariate Time Series through Stochastic Recurrent Neural Network
Su, Y., Zhao, Y., Niu, C., Liu, R., Sun, W., & Pei, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330672 · Cited by 1,804
Graph Neural Network-Based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series
Deng, A., & Hooi, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16523 · Cited by 1,413
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Chalapathy, R., & Chawla, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03407 · Cited by 1,240
Deep Learning for Time Series Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Darban, Z. Z., Webb, G. I., Pan, S., Aggarwal, C. C., & Salehi, M. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3691338 · Cited by 853
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection in Time-Series Data: Review, Analysis, and Guidelines
Choi, K., Yi, J., Park, C., & Yoon, S. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3107975 · Cited by 660
A Review of Deep Learning Models for Time Series Prediction
Han, Z., Zhao, J., Leung, H., Ma, K. F., & Wang, W. (2019) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2019.2923982 · Cited by 537
A review of deep learning with special emphasis on architectures, applications and recent trends
Sengupta, S., Basak, S., Saikia, P., Paul, S., Tsalavoutis, V. A., Atiah, F. D., Ravi, V., & Peters, A. (2020) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105596 · Cited by 490
Multi-head CNN–RNN for multi-time series anomaly detection: An industrial case study
Cañizo, M., Triguero, I., Conde, Á., & Onieva, E. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.034 · Cited by 431
Machine Learning in Chemical Engineering: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats
Dobbelaere, M. R., Plehiers, P. P., de Vijver, R. V., Stevens, C. V., & Geem, K. M. V. (2021) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2021.03.019 · Cited by 353
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence Capabilities to Improve Cybersecurity
Zeadally, S., Adi, E., Baig, Z. A., & Khan, I. A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2968045 · Cited by 359
Safat, W., Asghar, S., & Gillani, S. A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3078117 · Cited by 196
A Review of Cyber–Physical Security for Photovoltaic Systems
Ye, J., Giani, A., Elasser, A., Mazumder, S. K., Farnell, C., Mantooth, H. A., Kim, T., Liu, J., Chen, B., Seo, G., et al. (2021) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2021.3111728 · Cited by 165
Multivariate Regression-Based Fault Detection and Recovery of UAV Flight Data
Wang, B., Liu, D., Peng, Y., & Peng, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2019.2935576 · Cited by 160
Predicting Remaining Useful Life using Time Series Embeddings based on Recurrent Neural Networks
Gugulothu, N., Tv, V., Malhotra, P., Vig, L., Agarwal, P., & Shroff, G. M. (2020) · International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management · doi:10.36001/ijphm.2018.v9i1.2689 · Cited by 190
Real-time anomaly detection based on long short-Term memory and Gaussian Mixture Model
Ding, N., Ma, H., Gao, H., Ma, Y., & Tan, G. (2019) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.106458 · Cited by 150
Hao, W., Yang, T., & Yang, Q. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2021.3073396 · Cited by 143
Adaptive Memory Networks With Self-Supervised Learning for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection
Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Yu, H., & Qin, T. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2021.3139916 · Cited by 140
Time Series Data Cleaning: A Survey
Wang, X., & Wang, C. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2962152 · Cited by 143
A Multihead Attention Self-Supervised Representation Model for Industrial Sensors Anomaly Detection
Qiao, Y., Lü, J., Wang, T., Liu, K., Zhang, B., & Snoussi, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2023.3280337 · Cited by 132
MERLIN: Parameter-Free Discovery of Arbitrary Length Anomalies in Massive Time Series Archives
Nakamura, T., Imamura, M., Mercer, R., & Keogh, E. (2020) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm50108.2020.00147 · Cited by 118
Fault detection in Tennessee Eastman process with temporal deep learning models
Lomov, I., Lyubimov, M., Makarov, I., & Евгеньевич, Ж. Л. (2021) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2021.100216 · Cited by 123
Time Series Anomaly Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Transfer LearningPreprint
Wen, T., & Keyes, R. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.13628 · Cited by 132
Online anomaly detection with concept drift adaptation using recurrent neural networks
Saurav, S., Malhotra, P., Tv, V., Gugulothu, N., Vig, L., Agarwal, P., & Shroff, G. M. (2018) · Joint International Conference on Data Science & Management of Data (CODS-COMAD) · doi:10.1145/3152494.3152501 · Cited by 99
Advanced Intrusion Detection Combining Signature-Based and Behavior-Based Detection Methods
Kwon, H.-Y., Kim, T., & Lee, M.-K. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11060867 · Cited by 85
Concept Drift Adaptation Techniques in Distributed Environment for Real-World Data Streams
Mehmood, H., Kostakos, P., Cortés, M., Anagnostopoulos, T., Pirttikangas, S., & Gilman, E. (2021) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities4010021 · Cited by 85
Raman, M. R. G., Ahmed, C. M., & Mathur, A. P. (2021) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-021-00095-5 · Cited by 80
Park, S.-Y., & Ahn, J. (2020) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.019 · Cited by 78
Developing an Unsupervised Real-Time Anomaly Detection Scheme for Time Series With Multi-Seasonality
Wu, W., He, L., Lin, W., Su, Y., Cui, Y., Maple, C. R., & Jarvis, S. A. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2020.3035685 · Cited by 84
Multi-Scale LSTM Model for BGP Anomaly Classification
Cheng, M., Li, Q., Lv, J., Liu, W., & Wang, J. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2018.2824809 · Cited by 70
Shalyga, D., Filonov, P., & Lavrentyev, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.07282 · Cited by 103
Self-citationInput quality aware convolutional LSTM networks for virtual marine sensors
Oehmcke, S., Zielinski, O., & Krämer, O. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.11.027 · Cited by 61
Benhaddi, M., & Ouarzazi, J. (2021) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-020-05109-x · Cited by 61
Time Series Anomaly Detection with Multiresolution Ensemble Decoding
Shen, L., Yu, Z., Ma, Q., & Kwok, J. T.-Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i11.17152 · Cited by 64
Two Birds with One Network: Unifying Failure Event Prediction and Time-to-failure Modeling
Aggarwal, K., Atan, O., Farahat, A., Zhang, C., Ristovski, K., & Gupta, C. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8622431 · Cited by 51
Xie, T., Xu, Q., & Jiang, C. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120725 · Cited by 50
A Hybrid Physics-Based Data-Driven Framework for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control Systems
Raman, M. R. G., & Mathur, A. P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2021.3131662 · Cited by 46
A novel Edge architecture and solution for detecting concept drift in smart environments
Mehmood, H., Khalid, A., Kostakos, P., Gilman, E., & Pirttikangas, S. (2023) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2023.08.023 · Cited by 53
Correia, L., Goos, J.-C., Klein, P., Bäck, T., & Kononova, A. V. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109323 · Cited by 59
Data-Driven Cyber-Attack Detection for PV Farms via Time-Frequency Domain Features
Guo, L., Zhang, J., Ye, J., Coshatt, S. J., & Song, W. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2021.3136559 · Cited by 53
AAD-LLM: Adaptive Anomaly Detection Using Large Language Models
Russell-Gilbert, A., Sommers, A., Thompson, A., Cummins, L., Mittal, S., Rahimi, S., Seale, M. A., Jaboure, J., Arnold, T., & Church, J. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825679 · Cited by 47
Time is of the Essence: Machine Learning-Based Intrusion Detection in Industrial Time Series Data
Antón, S. D. D., Ahrens, L., Fraunholz, D., & Schotten, H. D. (2018) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2018.00008 · Cited by 39
A Novel Encoder-Decoder Model for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting
Zhang, H., Li, S., Chen, Y., Dai, J., & Yi, Y. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/5596676 · Cited by 39
Development of Oil Production Forecasting Method based on Deep Learning
Abdullayeva, F. J., & İmamverdiyev, Y. (2019) · Statistics Optimization & Information Computing · doi:10.19139/soic-2310-5070-651 · Cited by 36
Multivariate Time Series Early Classification Using Multi-Domain Deep Neural Network
Huang, H.-S., Liu, C., & Tseng, V. S. M. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa.2018.00019 · Cited by 36
An End-to-End model based on CNN-LSTM for Industrial Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis
Gao, Y., Ping, G., & Lanxin, L. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Network Infrastructure and Digital Content (IC-NIDC) · doi:10.1109/icnidc.2018.8525759 · Cited by 34
Using GRU neural network for cyber-attack detection in automated process control systems
Lavrova, D. S., Петрович, З. Д., & Yarmak, A. V. (2019) · IEEE International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/blackseacom.2019.8812818 · Cited by 34
Deep Anomaly Detection on Tennessee Eastman Process Data
Hartung, F., Franks, B. J., Michels, T., Wagner, D., Liznerski, P., Reithermann, S., Fellenz, S., Jirasek, F., Rudolph, M., Neider, D., et al. (2023) · Chemie Ingenieur Technik · doi:10.1002/cite.202200238 · Cited by 40
Differentiating and Predicting Cyberattack Behaviors Using LSTM
Perry, I., Li, L., Sweet, C. R., Su, S.-H., Cheng, F.-Y., Yang, S. J., & Okutan, A. (2018) · IEEE Conference on Dependable and Secure Computing (DSC) · doi:10.1109/desec.2018.8625145 · Cited by 29
Network security situation awareness forecasting based on statistical approach and neural networks
Sokol, P., Staňa, R., Gajdoš, A., & Pekarčík, P. (2022) · Logic Journal of IGPL · doi:10.1093/jigpal/jzac024 · Cited by 29
Anomaly Detection in Critical Infrastructure Using Probabilistic Neural Network
Raman, M. R. G., Somu, N., & Mathur, A. P. (2019) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0871-4_10 · Cited by 29
An improved autoencoder-based approach for anomaly detection in industrial control systems
Aslam, M. M., Tufail, A., Silva, L. C. D., Apong, R. A. A. H. M., & Namoun, A. (2024) · Systems Science & Control Engineering · doi:10.1080/21642583.2024.2334303 · Cited by 28
Moon, J., Noh, Y., Jung, S., Lee, J., & Hwang, E. (2023) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106099 · Cited by 32
Gulzar, Q., & Mustafa, K. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-89650-5 · Cited by 29
Xavier, G. M., & Seixas, J. M. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2018.8489385 · Cited by 30
Yasaei, R., Hernandez, F., & Faruque, M. A. A. (2020) · doi:10.1145/3400302.3415672 · Cited by 29
Deep learning and multivariate time series for cheat detection in video games
Pinto, J. P., Pimenta, A., & Nováis, P. (2021) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-021-06055-x · Cited by 25
False Data Injection Attack Detection in a Power Grid Using RNN
Deng, Q., & Sun, J. Q. (2018) · Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON) · doi:10.1109/iecon.2018.8591079 · Cited by 22
Bidirectional LSTM Autoencoder for Sequence Based Anomaly Detection in Cyber Security
Chawla, A., Lee, B., Jacob, P. M., & Fallon, S. (2019) · International Journal of Simulation Systems Science & Technology · doi:10.5013/ijssst.a.20.05.07 · Cited by 27
Anomaly Detection in Beehives using Deep Recurrent Autoencoders
Davidson, P., Steininger, M., Lautenschlager, F., Kobs, K., Krause, A., & Andreas Hotho, A. (2020) · International Conference on Sensor Networks · doi:10.5220/0009161201420149 · Cited by 24
Predicting cyber attacks on industrial systems using the Kalman filter
Daria, L., Zegzhda, D. P., & Yarmak, A. V. (2019) · World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability (WorldS4) · doi:10.1109/worlds4.2019.8904038 · Cited by 24
Kalinin, M., Lavrova, D. S., & Yarmak, A. V. (2018) · Automatic Control and Computer Sciences · doi:10.3103/s0146411618080151 · Cited by 21
Traffic Anomaly Detection in Intelligent Transport Applications with Time Series Data using Informer
Peng, X., Lin, Y., Cao, Q. P., Cen, Y., Zhuang, H., & Lin, Z. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc55140.2022.9922142 · Cited by 24
Self-Supervised Variational Graph Autoencoder for System-Level Anomaly Detection
Zhang, L., Cheng, W., Xing, J., Chen, X., Nie, Z., Zhang, S., Hong, J., & Xu, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3323989 · Cited by 20
Deep anomaly detection for time series: A survey
Jia, X., Peng, X., Peng, W., Zhao, B., Li, H., & Shen, C. (2025) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100787 · Cited by 27
DyAt Nets: Dynamic Attention Networks for State Forecasting in Cyber-Physical Systems
Muralidhar, N., Muthiah, S., & Ramakrishnan, N. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/441 · Cited by 21
MERLIN++: parameter-free discovery of time series anomalies
Nakamura, T., Mercer, R., Imamura, M., & Keogh, E. (2023) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-022-00876-7 · Cited by 18
(2021) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78086-9_6 · Cited by 19
Weakly Supervised Temporal Anomaly Segmentation with Dynamic Time Warping
Lee, D., Yu, S., Ju, H., & Yu, H. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00726 · Cited by 18
Recurrent Neural Networks for Online Remaining Useful Life Estimation in Ion Mill Etching System
Tv, V., Gupta, P., Malhotra, P., Vig, L., & Shroff, G. M. (2018) · Annual Conference of the PHM Society · doi:10.36001/phmconf.2018.v10i1.589 · Cited by 18
AICrit: A unified framework for real-time anomaly detection in water treatment plants
Raman, M. R. G., & Mathur, A. P. (2021) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2021.103046 · Cited by 16
Fast Memory-efficient Extreme Events Prediction in Complex Time series
Wambura, S. M., Li, H., & Nigussie, A. (2020) · International Conference on Robot Systems and Applications (ICRSA) · doi:10.1145/3402597.3402609 · Cited by 16
Zhao, M., Peng, H., Li, L., & Ren, Y. (2024) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2024.053765 · Cited by 18
Zhao, M., Peng, H., & Li, L. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3520362 · Cited by 17
Prediction of Process Quality Performance Using Statistical Analysis and Long Short-Term Memory
Pheng, T., Chuluunsaikhan, T., Ryu, G.-A., Kim, S.-H., Nasridinov, A., & Yoo, K. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12020735 · Cited by 18
Learn-to-Respond: Sequence-Predictive Recovery from Sensor Attacks in Cyber-Physical Systems
Liu, M., Zhang, L., Phoha, V. V., & Kong, F. (2023) · IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS) · doi:10.1109/rtss59052.2023.00017 · Cited by 15
Benchmarking Deep Learning for Time Series: Challenges and Directions
Huang, X., Fox, G., Serebryakov, S., Mohan, A., Morkisz, P. M., & Dutta, D. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata47090.2019.9005496 · Cited by 14
Unsupervised Offline Changepoint Detection Ensembles
Katser, I. D., Kozitsin, V., Lobachev, V., & Maksimov, I. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11094280 · Cited by 14
Representation Learning for Fault Diagnosis with Contrastive Predictive Coding
Wan, C., Zhang, T., Xiong, Z., & Ye, H. (2021) · CAA Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes (SAFEPROCESS) · doi:10.1109/safeprocess52771.2021.9693550 · Cited by 14
Robust Anomaly Detection in Feature-Evolving Time Series
Wambura, S. M., Huang, J., & Li, H. (2020) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxaa174 · Cited by 13
Deep learning compound trend prediction model for hydraulic turbine time series
Xiong, L., Liu, J., Song, B., Dang, J., Yang, F., & Lin, H. (2021) · International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies · doi:10.1093/ijlct/ctaa106 · Cited by 12
Naito, S., Taguchi, Y., Nakata, K., & Kato, Y. (2021) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw53433.2021.00072 · Cited by 13
Anomaly Detection in Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Communications
Russo, M., Labonne, M., Olivereau, A., & Rmayti, M. (2018) · IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · doi:10.1109/vtcspring.2018.8417863 · Cited by 11
Seo, J. K., Lee, J., Kim, B., Shim, W., & Seo, J. T. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15010020 · Cited by 15
Петрович, З. Д., Lavrova, D. S., & Khushkeev, A. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS) · doi:10.1109/icphys.2019.8780304 · Cited by 11
Lyu, M., Gong, H., Zhang, C., Wang, J., Zhong, M., Wang, Z., Li, Q., & Pan, Z. (2025) · Energy and AI · doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100515 · Cited by 11
Sokolov, A. N., Николаевич, Р. А., Pyatnitsky, I. A., & Alabugin, S. K. (2019) · International Conference on Security of Information and Networks (SIN) · doi:10.1145/3357613.3357637 · Cited by 11
Real-time anomaly detection in seasonal time series with conditional variational autoencoder
Porcelli, L., Trovati, M., & Palmieri, F. (2025) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113761 · Cited by 10
On Practical Aspects of Using RNNs for Fault Detection in Sparsely-labeled Multi-sensor Time Series
Gugulothu, N., Tv, V., Gupta, P., Malhotra, P., Vig, L., Agarwal, P., & Shroff, G. M. (2018) · Annual Conference of the PHM Society · doi:10.36001/phmconf.2018.v10i1.468 · Cited by 10
Time series prediction and anomaly detection with recurrent spiking neural networks
Cherdo, Y., Miramond, B., & Pégatoquet, A. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191614 · Cited by 11
Using Deep Generative Models to Boost Forecasting: A Phishing Prediction Case Study
Mahmood, S. H. A., & Abbasi, A. (2020) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw51313.2020.00073 · Cited by 9
Time-Series Multi-Instance Learning for Weakly Supervised Industrial Fault Detection
Liu, C., He, S., Li, S., Shi, Z., & Meng, W. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2024.3523591 · Cited by 8
Long Short-Term Model for Brent Oil Price Forecasting
Salvi, H. (2019) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2019.11050 · Cited by 8
A method of cleaning data from IoT devices in Big data systems
Bobulski, J., & Kubanek, M. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020651 · Cited by 8
Multivariate Long-Term State Forecasting in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Sequence to Sequence Approach
Muralidhar, N., Muthiah, S., Nakayama, K., Sharma, R. K., & Ramakrishnan, N. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata47090.2019.9005511 · Cited by 8
Tan, G., Chen, P., & Li, M. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS) · doi:10.1109/qrs60937.2023.00011 · Cited by 7
Anomaly Detectors for Multivariate Time Series: The Proof of the Pudding is in the Eating
Wenig, P., Schmidl, S., & Papenbrock, T. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW) · doi:10.1109/icdew61823.2024.00018 · Cited by 7
Lu, W., Zhang, Y., Wen, W., Yan, H., & Li, C. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-9229-1 · Cited by 7
Xiao, Q., Shao, S., & Wang, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08306 · Cited by 12
Hao, W., Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Yang, Q., Liu, B., Wang, W., Yang, T., & Ye, P. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1109/ticps.2024.3524185 · Cited by 6
Phishcasting: Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting of Phishing Attacks
Mahmood, S. H. A., Abbasi, S. M. A., Abbasi, A., & Zaffar, F. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) · doi:10.1109/isi49825.2020.9280509 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Filonov, P., Lavrentyev, A., & Vorontsov, A.
- ORCID
- Lavrentyev, Andrey
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1612.06676
- OpenAlex
- W2583164363
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- fault detection, multivariate time series, industrial process monitoring, LSTM, cyberattack simulation, predictive maintenance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review