The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Open accessAbstract
We study characteristics of receptive fields of units in deep convolutional networks. The receptive field size is a crucial issue in many visual tasks, as the output must respond to large enough areas in the image to capture information about large objects. We introduce the notion of an effective receptive field, and show that it both has a Gaussian distribution and only occupies a fraction of the full theoretical receptive field. We analyze the effective receptive field in several architecture designs, and the effect of nonlinear activations, dropout, sub-sampling and skip connections on it. This leads to suggestions for ways to address its tendency to be too small.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recent works on effective receptive fields [31] and salient regions [41, 44, 13, 7] reveal that only a small proportion of pixels in the theoretical receptive field contribute significantly to the final network prediction.”
From Deformable ConvNets V2: More Deformable, Better Results (2019) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001
MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Vision
Tolstikhin, I., Houlsby, N., Kolesnikov, A., Beyer, L., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Yung, J., Steiner, A., Keysers, D., Uszkoreit, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.01601 · Cited by 2,087
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, W., Li, Y., Urtasun, R., & Zemel, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 29
- Pages
- 4898-4906
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1701.04128
- OpenAlex
- W2556967412
- Cited by
- 1,575
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 184 · 2024: 278 · 2023: 290 · 2022: 194 · 2021: 228 · 2020: 170 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 20
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- effective receptive field, receptive field size, deep convolutional neural networks, nonlinear activation functions, dropout, subsampling, skip connections, network architecture design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
