Preparing for the Unknown: Learning a Universal Policy with Online System Identification
Open accessAbstract
We present a new method of learning control policies that successfully operate under unknown dynamic models. We create such policies by leveraging a large number of training examples that are generated using a physical simulator. Our system is made of two components: a Universal Policy (UP) and a function for Online System Identification (OSI). We describe our control policy as universal because it is trained over a wide array of dynamic models. These variations in the dynamic model may include differences in mass and inertia of the robots' components, variable friction coefficients, or unknown mass of an object to be manipulated. By training the Universal Policy with this variation, the control policy is prepared for a wider array of possible conditions when executed in an unknown environment. The second part of our system uses the recent state and action history of the system to predict the dynamics model parameters mu. The value of mu from the Online System Identification is then provided as input to the control policy (along with the system state). Together, UP-OSI is a robust control policy that can be used across a wide range of dynamic models, and that is also responsive to sudden changes in the environment. We have evaluated the performance of this system on a variety of tasks, including the problem of cart-pole swing-up, the double inverted pendulum, locomotion of a hopper, and block-throwing of a manipulator. UP-OSI is effective at these tasks across a wide range of dynamic models. Moreover, when tested with dynamic models outside of the training range, UP-OSI outperforms the Universal Policy alone, even when UP is given the actual value of the model dynamics. In addition to the benefits of creating more robust controllers, UP-OSI also holds out promise of narrowing the Reality Gap between simulated and real physical systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
System identification using a history of past trajectories has been previously explored by Yu et al. [24].
“System identification using a history of past trajectories has been previously explored by Yu et al. [24].”
From Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomization (2018) · cites this paper as Yu et al. [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 237
- Authors
- Yu, W., Tan, J., Liu, C. K., & Turk, G.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- arXiv
- 1702.02453
- OpenAlex
- W2963614114
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Robotics: Science and Systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1514258)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- online system identification, unknown dynamics, robust control, physical simulation, double inverted pendulum, reality gap, robotic manipulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review