Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 23

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Information

Shwartz-Ziv, Ravid, Tishby, Naftali·2017·arXiv

Abstract

Despite their great success, there is still no comprehensive theoretical understanding of learning with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) or their inner organization. Previous work proposed to analyze DNNs in the \textit{Information Plane}; i.e., the plane of the Mutual Information values that each layer preserves on the input and output variables. They suggested that the goal of the network is to optimize the Information Bottleneck (IB) tradeoff between compression and prediction, successively, for each layer. In this work we follow up on this idea and demonstrate the effectiveness of the Information-Plane visualization of DNNs. Our main results are: (i) most of the training epochs in standard DL are spent on {\emph compression} of the input to efficient representation and not on fitting the training labels. (ii) The representation compression phase begins when the training errors becomes small and the Stochastic Gradient Decent (SGD) epochs change from a fast drift to smaller training error into a stochastic relaxation, or random diffusion, constrained by the training error value. (iii) The converged layers lie on or very close to the Information Bottleneck (IB) theoretical bound, and the maps from the input to any hidden layer and from this hidden layer to the output satisfy the IB self-consistent equations. This generalization through noise mechanism is unique to Deep Neural Networks and absent in one layer networks. (iv) The training time is dramatically reduced when adding more hidden layers. Thus the main advantage of the hidden layers is computational. This can be explained by the reduced relaxation time, as this it scales super-linearly (exponentially for simple diffusion) with the information compression from the previous layer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1703.00810

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. A. Achille and S. Soatto. Information Dropout: Learning Optimal Representations Through Noisy Computation. ArXiv e-prints, November 2016.
  2. David Balduzzi, Marcus Frean, Lennox Leary, J. P. Lewis, Kurt Wan-Duo Ma, and Brian McWilliams. The shattered gradients problem: If resnets are the answer, then what is the ques- tion? CoRR, abs/1702.08591, 2017. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08591. · arXiv
  3. Junghwan Cho, Kyewook Lee, Ellie Shin, Garry Choy, and Synho Do. How much data is needed to train a medical image deep learning system to achieve necessary high accuracy? arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06348, 2015. · arXiv
  4. Thomas M. Cover and Joy A Thomas. Elements of Information Theory (Wiley Series in Telecom- munications and Signal Processing). Wiley-Interscience, 2006.
  5. Alex Graves, Abdel-rahman Mohamed, and Geoffrey Hinton. Speech recognition with deep recur- rent neural networks. In Acoustics, speech and signal processing (icassp), 2013 ieee international conference on, pages 6645-6649. IEEE, 2013.
  6. Simon Haykin. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 1998. ISBN 0132733501.
  7. Geoffrey E Hinton, Nitish Srivastava, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan R Salakhutdi- nov. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580, 2012. · arXiv
  8. Jonathan Kadmon and Haim Sompolinsky. Optimal architectures in a solvable model of deep net- works. In NIPS, 2016.
  9. Michael Kazhdan, Thomas Funkhouser, and Szymon Rusinkiewicz. Rotation invariant spherical harmonic representation of 3d shape descriptors. Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Pro- cessing, 2003.
  10. Alexander Kraskov, Harald Stögbauer, and Peter Grassberger. Estimating mutual information. Phys. Rev. E, 69:066138, Jun 2004. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066138. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Michal Moshkovich and Naftali Tishby. Mixing complexity and its applications to neural networks. 2017. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00729. · arXiv
  12. H. Risken. The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications. Number isbn9780387504988, lccn=89004059 in Springer series in synergetics. Springer-Verlag, 1989.
  13. Naftali Tishby and Noga Zaslavsky. Deep learning and the information bottleneck principle. In Information Theory Workshop (ITW), 2015 IEEE, pages 1-5. IEEE, 2015.
  14. Chiyuan Zhang, Samy Bengio, Moritz Hardt, Benjamin Recht, and Oriol Vinyals. Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.03530, 2016. · arXiv
  15. Xiang Zhang and Yann LeCun. Text understanding from scratch. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.01710, 2015. · arXiv

Cited by

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Shwartz-Ziv, R., & Tishby, N.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
References
3
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review