CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 13Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation

Open access
Pont-Tuset, Jordi, Perazzi, Federico, Caelles, Sergi, Arbeláez, Pablo, Sorkine-Hornung, Alex, Van Gool, Luc·2017·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1704.00675arXiv 1704.00675
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We present the 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation, a public dataset, benchmark, and competition specifically designed for the task of video object segmentation. Following the footsteps of other successful initiatives, such as ILSVRC and PASCAL VOC, which established the avenue of research in the fields of scene classification and semantic segmentation, the DAVIS Challenge comprises a dataset, an evaluation methodology, and a public competition with a dedicated workshop co-located with CVPR 2017. The DAVIS Challenge follows up on the recent publication of DAVIS (Densely-Annotated VIdeo Segmentation), which has fostered the development of several novel state-of-the-art video object segmentation techniques. In this paper we describe the scope of the benchmark, highlight the main characteristics of the dataset, define the evaluation metrics of the competition, and present a detailed analysis of the results of the participants to the challenge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1704.00675

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [1][1] O. Russakovsky, J. Deng, H. Su, J. Krause, S. Satheesh, S. Ma, Z. Huang, A. Karpathy, A. Khosla, M. Bernstein, A. C. Berg, and L. Fei-Fei, 'ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge,' IJCV , 2015. -
  2. [3][3] F. Perazzi, J. Pont-Tuset, B. McWilliams, L. Van Gool, M. Gross, and A. Sorkine-Hornung, 'A benchmark dataset and evaluation methodology for video object segmentation,' in CVPR , 2016. -
  3. [2][2] M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman, 'The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2012 (VOC2012) Results,' http://www.pascalnetwork.org/challenges/VOC/voc2012/workshop/index.html. -
  4. [4][4] T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Dollr, and C. Zitnick, 'Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context,' in ECCV , 2014. -
  5. [6][6] F. Perazzi, A. Khoreva, R. Benenson, B. Schiele, and A.SorkineHornung, 'Learning video object segmentation from static images,' in CVPR , 2017. -
  6. [5][5] S. Caelles, K.-K. Maninis, J. Pont-Tuset, L. Leal-Taix´ e, D. Cremers, and L. Van Gool, 'One-shot video object segmentation,' in CVPR , 2017. -
  7. [7][7] N. Nicolas M¨ arki, F. Perazzi, O. Wang, and A. Sorkine-Hornung, 'Bilateral space video segmentation,' in CVPR , 2016. -
  8. [9][9] X. Li, Y. Qi, Z. Wang, K. Chen, Z. Liu, J. Shi, P. Luo, C. C. Loy, and X. Tang, 'Video object segmentation with re-identification,' The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation - CVPR Workshops , 2017. -
  9. [8][8] F. Perazzi, O. Wang, M. Gross, and A. Sorkine-Hornung, 'Fully connected object proposals for video segmentation,' in ICCV , 2015. -
  10. [10][10] A. Khoreva, R. Benenson, E. Ilg, T. Brox, and B. Schiele, 'Lucid data dreaming for object tracking,' The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation - CVPR Workshops , 2017. -
  11. [11][11] T.-N. Le, K.-T. Nguyen, M.-H. Nguyen-Phan, T.-V. Ton, T.-A. N. (2), X.-S. Trinh, Q.-H. Dinh, V.-T. Nguyen, A.-D. Duong, A. Sugimoto, T. V. Nguyen, and M.-T. Tran, 'Instance re-identification flow for video object segmentation,' The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation - CVPR Workshops , 2017. Fig. 7. Qualitative results : Comparison between top-performing methods in different sequences. <!-- image --> -
  12. [12][12] A. Shaban, A. Firl, A. Humayun, J. Yuan, X. Wang, P. Lei, N. Dhanda, B. Boots, J. M. Rehg, and F. Li, 'Multiple-instance video segmentation with sequence-specific object proposals,' The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation - CVPR Workshops , 2017. -
  13. [14][14] J. Cheng, S. Liu, Y.-H. Tsai, W.-C. Hung, S. Gupta, J. Gu, J. Kautz, S. Wang, and M.-H. Yang, 'Learning to segment instances in 3. videos with spatial propagation network,' The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation - CVPR Workshops , 2017. -
  14. [16][16] A. Newswanger and C. Xu, 'One-shot video object segmentation with iterative online fine-tuning,' The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation - CVPR Workshops , 2017. -
  15. [15][15] H. Zhao, 'Some promising ideas about multi-instance video segmentation,' The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation - CVPR Workshops , 2017. -
  16. [17][17] G. Sharir, E. Smolyansky, and I. Friedman, 'Video object segmentation using tracked object proposals,' The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation - CVPR Workshops , 2017. - [13] P. Voigtlaender and B. Leibe, 'Online adaptation of convolutional neural networks for the 2017 davis challenge on video object segmentation,' The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation - CVPR Workshops , 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pont-Tuset, J., Perazzi, F., Caelles, S., Arbeláez, P., Sorkine-Hornung, A., & Van Gool, L.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1704.00675
arXiv
1704.00675
OpenAlex
W6967113591
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
video object segmentation, benchmark, evaluation metrics, DAVIS dataset, public competition, semantic segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review