CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 221Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsQuantum many-body systemsAdvanced Operator Algebra Research

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction via Universal Recovery Channels

Open access
Cotler, Jordan, Hayden, Patrick, Penington, Geoffrey, Salton, Grant, Swingle, Brian, Walter, Michael·2017·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1704.05839arXiv 1704.05839
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We apply and extend the theory of universal recovery channels from quantum information theory to address the problem of entanglement wedge reconstruction in AdS/CFT. It has recently been proposed that any low-energy local bulk operators in a CFT boundary region's entanglement wedge can be reconstructed on that boundary region itself. Existing work arguing for this proposal relies on algebraic consequences of the exact equivalence between bulk and boundary relative entropies, namely the theory of operator algebra quantum error correction. However, bulk and boundary relative entropies are only approximately equal in bulk effective field theory, and in similar situations it is known that predictions from exact entropic equalities can be qualitatively incorrect. The framework of universal recovery channels provides a robust demonstration of the entanglement wedge reconstruction conjecture in addition to new physical insights. Most notably, we find that a bulk operator acting in a given boundary region's entanglement wedge can be expressed as the response of the boundary region's modular Hamiltonian to a perturbation of the bulk state in the direction of the bulk operator. This formula can be interpreted as a noncommutative version of Bayes' rule that attempts to undo the noise induced by restricting to only a portion of the boundary, and has an integral representation in terms of modular flows. To reach these conclusions, we extend the theory of universal recovery channels to finite-dimensional operator algebras and demonstrate that recovery channels approximately preserve the multiplicative structure of the operator algebra.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1704.05839

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIG. 1 (a) The HKLL procedure provides a way of writing bulk operators in terms of boundary operators living on a strip in the boundary consisting of all points that are spacelike separated from the bulk point. (b) The causal wedge HKLL procedure provides a way of expressing bulk operators in terms of boundary operators living only in the domain of dependence of a boundary region whose associated causal wedge contains the bulk point.
FIG. 1 (a) The HKLL procedure provides a way of writing bulk operators in terms of boundary operators living on a strip in the boundary consisting of all points that are spacelike separated from the bulk point. (b) The causal wedge HKLL procedure provides a way of expressing bulk operators in terms of boundary operators living only in the domain of dependence of a boundary region whose associated causal wedge contains the bulk point.CC-BY · From the PDF
FIG. 2 (a) A bipartition of the boundary into a connected piece A and its complement ¯ A . In this case, the entanglement wedge of A coincides with the causal wedge of A labeled by a in the figure. ¯ a is then the complement of a . (b) A bipartition of the boundary into A and ¯ A such that A consists of two disconnected components. In the figure above, A spans just more than half of the boundary, and in this case, the entanglement wedge of A is not simply the union of the causal wedges of each piece of A . In the bulk, a represents the entanglement wedge of A and ¯ a is the complement of a .
FIG. 2 (a) A bipartition of the boundary into a connected piece A and its complement ¯ A . In this case, the entanglement wedge of A coincides with the causal wedge of A labeled by a in the figure. ¯ a is then the complement of a . (b) A bipartition of the boundary into A and ¯ A such that A consists of two disconnected components. In the figure above, A spans just more than half of the boundary, and in this case, the entanglement wedge of A is not simply the union of the causal wedges of each piece of A . In the bulk, a represents the entanglement wedge of A and ¯ a is the complement of a .CC-BY · From the PDF
FIG. 3 We show in Eq. (15) that correlation functions of bulk operators can be computed by pushing each bulk operator to the boundary separately and computing the expectation value in the boundary theory. The bulk operators need not live in the same entanglement wedge. In this figure, the boundary is decomposed into four regions: A , B , C , and D . Regions AB and BC have a nontrivial intersection, and the bulk operators ϕ are localized to the regions as shown. We can use the recovery maps R  AB and R  BC to push the operators to AB and BC , respectively.
FIG. 3 We show in Eq. (15) that correlation functions of bulk operators can be computed by pushing each bulk operator to the boundary separately and computing the expectation value in the boundary theory. The bulk operators need not live in the same entanglement wedge. In this figure, the boundary is decomposed into four regions: A , B , C , and D . Regions AB and BC have a nontrivial intersection, and the bulk operators ϕ are localized to the regions as shown. We can use the recovery maps R  AB and R  BC to push the operators to AB and BC , respectively.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. A. Winter and K. Li, A Stronger Subadditivity Relation? With Applications to Squashed Entanglement, Sharability and Separability, in Proceedings of the BIRS Workshop, 2012.
  2. M. Ohya and D. Petz, Quantum Entropy and Its Use (Springer, New York, 2004).
  3. T. Banks, M. R. Douglas, G. T. Horowitz, and E. Martinec, AdS Dynamics from Conformal Field Theory, arXiv:hep-th/ 9808016.
  4. C.-F. Chen, G. Penington, and G. Salton, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction using the Petz Map, arXiv: 1902.02844. · arXiv
  5. D. Petz, Quantum Information Theory and Quantum Statistics (Springer, New York, 2007).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–221 of 221

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cotler, J., Hayden, P., Penington, G., Salton, G., Swingle, B., & Walter, M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • QuSoft (NL)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
Volume
9
Issue
3
ISSN
2160-3308 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1704.05839
arXiv
1704.05839
OpenAlex
W2608364249
Cited by
221
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7
FWCI
15.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Physical Review X (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation
  • Hertz Foundation
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (680-47-459)
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (W911NF-14-1-0003)
  • Institute for Quantum Information and Matter, California Institute of Technology
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (W911NF-14-1-0003)
  • Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-16-1-0082, FA9550-16, -16-1-, FA9550-16-1)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-14-1, W911NF-14-1-0003, W911NF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
Keywords
entanglement wedge reconstruction, AdS/CFT correspondence, Kullback-Leibler divergence, modular Hamiltonian, quantum information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review