The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variational Approaches for Auto-Encoding Generative Adversarial Networks
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks
Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.244 · Cited by 23,602
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks
Radford, A., Metz, L., & Chintala, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.06434 · Cited by 12,235
Improved Techniques for Training GANs
Salimans, T., Goodfellow, I., Zaremba, W., Cheung, V., Radford, A., & Chen, X. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.03498 · Cited by 6,965
Improved training of Wasserstein GANs
Gulrajani, I., Ahmed, F., Arjovsky, M., Dumoulin, V., & Courville, A. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.00028 · Cited by 6,800
Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment
Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E. P., & Bovik, A. C. (2004) · The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2003.1292216 · Cited by 6,253 · cited 2×
“[29] assess the similarity between class-conditional generated samples using MSSSIM [40], an image similarity metric that has been shown to correlate well with human judgement.”
MethodLearning to Discover Cross-Domain Relations with Generative Adversarial Networks
Kim, T., Cha, M., Kim, H., Lee, J. K., & Kim, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.05192 · Cited by 1,716
Cited by
A review of medical image data augmentation techniques for deep learning applications
Chlap, P., Min, H., Vandenberg, N., Dowling, J., Holloway, L., & Haworth, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1111/1754-9485.13261 · Cited by 956
Barratt, S., & Sharma, R. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.01973 · Cited by 732
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs): Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions
Saxena, D., & Cao, J. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3446374 · Cited by 689
Generating Natural Adversarial Examples
Zhao, Z., Dua, D., & Singh, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.11342 · Cited by 508
A Variational U-Net for Conditional Appearance and Shape Generation
Esser, P., & Sutter, E. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00923 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosca, M., Lakshminarayanan, B., Warde-Farley, D., & Mohamed, S.
- Venue
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Publisher
- Cornell University
- Published
- 2017-06-15
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1706.04987
- OpenAlex
- W2624918875
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 9
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variational Approaches for Auto-Encoding Generative Adversarial Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1706.04987
- The paper
- Rosca, M., Lakshminarayanan, B., Warde-Farley, D., & Mohamed, S. (2017). Variational Approaches for Auto-Encoding Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1706.04987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
