Pure states in the SYK model and nearly-$AdS_2$ gravity

If the system is evolved with unperturbed Hamiltonian H, such excitations can never reach the boundary; if perturbed by δH = -εJ Σ s_k iψ_{2k-1}ψ_{2k}, the Schwarzian boundary particle is pulled into the bulk, rendering the interior visible to the boundary, and interior operators can be reconstructed using boundary operators time-evolved with the perturbed Hamiltonian.

“If the system is evolved with the unperturbed Hamiltonian H, then such excitations can never reach the boundary.However, if we perturb the Hamiltonian by δH = -εJ N/2 k=1 s k iψ 2k-1 ψ 2k , (C.7) then, from a gravity perspective, the Schwarzian 'boundary particle' is pulled into the bulk of the AdS 2 space, as shown in figure 17.By evolving the system with the perturbed Hamiltonian H + δH, we can”

It was shown in [37] that the states |B_s(β) have a natural gravity interpretation as black hole microstates with a smooth interior ending on an end-of-the-world brane.

“It was shown in [37] that the states |B s (β) have a natural gravity interpretation as black hole microstates with a smooth interior ending on an 'end-of-the-world brane' (figure 17).”

In simple topological models inspired by Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with and without end-of-the-world branes, and perhaps also with an extra boundary degree of freedom, without EOW branes there is a single asymptotically AdS boundary condition Z, for which the associated operator Z is naturally interpreted as the dimension of the CFT Hilbert space.

“We then explored this construction in detail in simple topological models inspired by Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with and without end-of-the-world branes (EOW branes, see e.g.[49,104]), and perhaps also with an extra boundary degree of freedom.Without EOW branes, there is a single asymptotically AdS boundary condition Z, for which the associated operator Z is naturally interpreted as the dimension”

The argument that δH can make the interior visible is given in section 7 of [37]; for δH_f the argument is identical except for O(1) factor f in the perturbation to the large N semiclassical Schwarzian action.

“The argument that the perturbation δH can be used to make the interior visible to a boundary observer is given in section 7 of [37].For the full details, we simply refer readers to that work.However the basic strategy is to assume that for ε 1 we can treat δH as a perturbation to the Schwarzian action (C.2) of the reparameterisation modes.So long as we have O(N ) terms, the perturbation will”