NuCypher KMS: Decentralized key management system
Open accessAbstract
NuCypher KMS is a decentralized Key Management System (KMS) that addresses the limitations of using consensus networks to securely store and manipulate private, encrypted data. It provides encryption and cryptographic access controls, performed by a decentralized network, leveraging proxy re-encryption. Unlike centralized KMS as a service solutions, it doesn't require trusting a service provider. NuCypher KMS enables sharing of sensitive data for both decentralized and centralized applications, providing security infrastructure for applications from healthcare to identity management to decentralized content marketplaces. NuCypher KMS will be an essential part of decentralized applications, just as SSL/TLS is an essential part of every secure web application.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An alternative is to store large ciphered data in decentralized off-ledger databases, like IPFS, and include as a transaction the unique resource identifier and its hash to obtain integrity of the data and proof of existence.
“The alternative is to store large ciphered data in decentralized off-ledger databases, like IPFS [133], and include as a transaction the unique resource identi er and its hash to obtain integrity of the data and proof of existence.”
From Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019) · cites this paper as [133]
The proposed solution is superior to two existing cloud-based PHR management solutions [36], [37] as shown in Table 2.
“The table shows the superiority of the proposed solution as it employs blockchain technology, Ethereum smart contracts, distributed trusted oracles, distributed decentralized database storage, and proxy re-encryption technology.”
From Blockchain for Giving Patients Control Over Their Medical Records (2020) · cites this paper as [37]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges
Bernal Bernabe, J., Canovas, J. L., Hernandez-Ramos, J. L., Torres Moreno, R., & Skarmeta, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2950872 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
“To minimize the risk, the key management service can be decentralized, so that users can store their keys among different providers (proxies) that hold re-encryption keys versions of their master keys, as proposed by KMSChain1 or NyCypher [81].”
BackgroundBlockchain for Giving Patients Control Over Their Medical Records
Madine, M. M., Battah, A. A., Yaqoob, I., Salah, K., Jayaraman, R., Al-Hammadi, Y., Pesic, S., & Ellahham, S. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3032553 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
“It uses NuCypher key management system (KMS) to address the limitations of using consensus networks for securely storing and manipulating encrypted data [25].”
MethodWong, J., & Henderson, T. (2019) · International Data Privacy Law · doi:10.1093/idpl/ipz008 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Egorov, M., Wilkison, M., & Nunez, D.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1707.06140
- OpenAlex
- W2739229037
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
- Keywords
- key management system, decentralized key management, proxy re-encryption, cryptographic access control, encrypted data sharing, decentralized applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
