The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Non-Hermitian Topological Theory of Finite-Lifetime Quasiparticles: Prediction of Bulk Fermi Arc Due to Exceptional Point
Abstract
We introduce a topological theory to study quasiparticles in interacting and/or disordered many-body systems, which have a finite lifetime due to inelastic and/or elastic scattering. The one-body quasiparticle Hamiltonian includes both the Bloch Hamiltonian of band theory and the self-energy due to interactions, which is non-Hermitian when quasiparticle lifetime is finite. We study the topology of non-Hermitian quasiparticle Hamiltonians in momentum space, whose energy spectrum is complex. The interplay of band structure and quasiparticle lifetime is found to have remarkable consequences in zero- and small-gap systems. In particular, we predict the existence of topological exceptional point and bulk Fermi arc in Dirac materials with two distinct quasiparticle lifetimes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Photonic tachyonlike dispersion was demonstrated in the form of exceptional rings in photonic crystals as well as Fermi arc-type states that connect between exceptional points in two-dimensional systems.
“One example is photonic”
From Topological photonics (2019) · cites this paper as Kozii and Fu, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982).
- M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
- Y. Ando, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 102001 (2013).
- T. Kato, Perturbation theory of linear operators (Springer, Berlin, 1966).
- H. Shen, B. Zhen and L. Fu, arXiv:1706.07435 · arXiv
- H. Eleuch and I. Rotter, Phys. Rev. A 95, 022117 (2017).
- Bo Zhen, Chia Wei Hsu, Yuichi Igarashi, Ling Lu, Ido Kaminer, Adi Pick, Song-Liang Chua, John D. Joannopoulos and Marin Soljacic, Nature, 525, 354 (2015).
- M. Dzero, J. Xia, V. Galitski, and P. Coleman, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 7, 249 (2016).
- X. Qian, J. Liu, L. Fu, and J. Li, Science 346, 1344 (2014).
- Ilija Zeljkovic, Yoshinori Okada, Cheng-Yi Huang, R. Sankar, Daniel Walkup, Wenwen Zhou, Maksym Serbyn, Fangcheng Chou, Wei-Feng Tsai, Hsin Lin, A. Bansil, Liang Fu, M.Zahid Hasan, and Vidya Madhavan, Nature Physics 10, 572 (2014).
- S. Y. Savrasov and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B 69, 245101 (2004).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ozawa, T., Price, H. M., Amo, A., Goldman, N., Hafezi, M., Lu, L., Rechtsman, M. C., Schuster, D., Simon, J., Zilberberg, O., et al. (2019) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015006 · Cited by 3,722
Metadata
- Authors
- Kozii, V., & Fu, L.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- arXiv
- 1708.05841
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
