The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic Detection of Fake News
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles
Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203029005010 · Cited by 1,439
FEVER: a Large-scale Dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification
Thorne, J., Vlachos, A., Christodoulopoulos, C., & Mittal, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1074 · Cited by 1,343
News use across social media platforms 2016
Gottfried, J. A., & Shearer, E. (2016) · Cited by 1,184
Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination
Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T. (2011) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1107.4557 · Cited by 1,008
Fake News or Truth? Using Satirical Cues to Detect Potentially Misleading News
Rubin, V., Conroy, N., Chen, Y., & Cornwell, S. (2016) · Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computational Approaches to Deception Detection · doi:10.18653/v1/w16-0802 · Cited by 584
Deception detection for news: Three types of fakes
Rubin, V. L., Chen, Y., & Conroy, N. K. (2015) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010083 · Cited by 546
Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics, ProbabilityTheory Group (Formerly: E1071), TU Wien
MEYER, D. A., Dimitriadou, E., Hornik, K., Weingessel, A., & Leisch, F. (2015) · Cited by 523
(2013) · Cited by 353
Making computers laugh: investigations in automatic humor recognition
Mihalcea, R., & Strapparava, C. (2005) · Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - HLT '05 · doi:10.3115/1220575.1220642 · Cited by 224
Self-citation
Cited by
A Survey of Fake News: Fundamental Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunities
Zhou, X., & Zafarani, R. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3395046 · Cited by 1,184
A Stylometric Inquiry into Hyperpartisan and Fake News
Potthast, M., Kiesel, J., Reinartz, K., Bevendorff, J., & Stein, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1022 · Cited by 686
Defending Against Neural Fake News
Zellers, R., Holtzman, A., Rashkin, H., Bisk, Y., Farhadi, A., Roesner, F., & Choi, Y. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.12616 · Cited by 569
Combating Fake News: A Survey on Identification and Mitigation Techniques
Sharma, K., Qian, F., Jiang, H., Ruchansky, N., Zhang, M., & Liu, Y. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3305260 · Cited by 514
A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking
Guo, Z., Schlichtkrull, M., & Vlachos, A. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00454 · Cited by 500
Metadata
- Authors
- Pérez‐Rosas, V., Kleinberg, B., Lefevre, A., & Mihalcea, R. F.
- Venue
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Publisher
- Cornell University
- Published
- 2017-08-23
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1708.07104
- OpenAlex
- W2749784378
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 12
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic Detection of Fake News. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1708.07104
- The paper
- Pérez‐Rosas, V., Kleinberg, B., Lefevre, A., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2017). Automatic Detection of Fake News. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1708.07104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
