CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 3

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross-Age LFW: A Database for Studying Cross-Age Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environments

Zheng, Tianyue, Deng, Weihong, Hu, Jiani·2017·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1708.08197arXiv 1708.08197
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW) database has been widely utilized as the benchmark of unconstrained face verification and due to big data driven machine learning methods, the performance on the database approaches nearly 100%. However, we argue that this accuracy may be too optimistic because of some limiting factors. Besides different poses, illuminations, occlusions and expressions, cross-age face is another challenge in face recognition. Different ages of the same person result in large intra-class variations and aging process is unavoidable in real world face verification. However, LFW does not pay much attention on it. Thereby we construct a Cross-Age LFW (CALFW) which deliberately searches and selects 3,000 positive face pairs with age gaps to add aging process intra-class variance. Negative pairs with same gender and race are also selected to reduce the influence of attribute difference between positive/negative pairs and achieve face verification instead of attributes classification. We evaluate several metric learning and deep learning methods on the new database. Compared to the accuracy on LFW, the accuracy drops about 10%-17% on CALFW.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1708.08197

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contemporary FR systems experience a significant decrease in accuracy exceeding 10% when confronted with substantial age disparities during evaluation.

    “These systems experience a significant decrease in accuracy exceeding 10% when confronted with substantial age disparities during evaluation [20].”

    From Longitudinal Evaluation of Child Face Recognition and the Impact of Underlying Age (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. T. Ahonen, A. Hadid, and M. Pietikainen. Face description with local binary patterns: Application to face recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli- gence, 28(12):2037-2041, Dec 2006.
  2. T. L. Berg, A. C. Berg, J. Edwards, and D. A. Forsyth. Whos in the picture. pages 264-271, 2004.
  3. T. L. Berg, A. C. Berg, J. Edwards, M. Maire, R. White, Y.- W. Teh, E. Learned-Miller, and D. A. Forsyth. Names and faces in the news. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Com- puter Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004., volume 2, pages II-848- II-854 Vol.2, June 2004.
  4. B. Chen, W. Deng, and J. Du. Noisy softmax: Improving the generalization ability of dcnn via postponing the early softmax saturation. In The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), July 2017.
  5. J. V. Davis, B. Kulis, P. Jain, S. Sra, and I. S. Dhillon. Information-theoretic metric learning. In International Con- ference on Machine Learning, pages 209-216, 2007.
  6. B. F. Klare, B. Klein, E. Taborsky, A. Blanton, J. Cheney, K. Allen, P. Grother, A. Mah, and A. K. Jain. Pushing the frontiers of unconstrained face detection and recognition: Iarpa janus benchmark a. In The IEEE Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2015.
  7. D. Miller, I. Kemelmacher-Shlizerman, and S. M. Seitz. Megaface: A million faces for recognition at scale. CoRR, abs/1505.02108, 2015. · arXiv
  8. H. W. Ng and S. Winkler. A data-driven approach to cleaning large face datasets. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pages 343-347, Oct 2014.
  9. O. M. Parkhi, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman. Deep face recognition. In British Machine Vision Conference, pages 41.1-41.12, 2015.
  10. P. J. Phillips, H. Moon, S. A. Rizvi, and P. J. Rauss. The feret evaluation methodology for face-recognition algo- rithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(10):1090-1104, Oct 2000.
  11. P. M. Roth, P. Wohlhart, M. Hirzer, M. Kostinger, and H. Bischof. Large scale metric learning from equivalence constraints. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2288-2295, 2012.
  12. R. Rothe, R. Timofte, and L. Van Gool. Dex: Deep expec- tation of apparent age from a single image. In The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) Work- shops, December 2015.
  13. D. A. Shamma, D. A. Shamma, G. Friedland, B. Elizalde, K. Ni, D. Poland, D. Borth, and L. J. Li. Yfcc100m: the new data in multimedia research. Communications of the Acm, 59(2):64-73, 2016.
  14. T. Sim, S. Baker, and M. Bsat. The cmu pose, illumination, and expression (pie) database. In Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recog- nition, pages 46-51, May 2002.
  15. Y. Sun, Y. Chen, X. Wang, and X. Tang. Deep learning face representation by joint identification-verification. In Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. D. Lawrence, and K. Q. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems 27, pages 1988-1996.
  16. Y. Sun, D. Liang, X. Wang, and X. Tang. Deepid3: Face recognition with very deep neural networks. CoRR, abs/1502.00873, 2015. · arXiv
  17. Y. Taigman, M. Yang, M. Ranzato, and L. Wolf. Deepface: Closing the gap to human-level performance in face verifi- cation. In The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2014.
  18. D. Yi, Z. Lei, S. Liao, and S. Z. Li. Learning face represen- tation from scratch. CoRR, abs/1411.7923, 2014. · arXiv
  19. K. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. Li, and Y. Qiao. Joint face detection and alignment using multitask cascaded convolutional net- works. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 23(10):1499-1503, Oct 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, T., Deng, W., & Hu, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1708.08197
arXiv
1708.08197
References
3
Type
Preprint
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review