The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Quantum Algorithm for Simulating the Wave Equation
Open accessAbstract
We present a quantum algorithm for simulating the wave equation under Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions. The algorithm uses Hamiltonian simulation and quantum linear system algorithms as subroutines. It relies on factorizations of discretized Laplacian operators to allow for improved scaling in truncation errors and improved scaling for state preparation relative to general purpose linear differential equation algorithms. We also consider using Hamiltonian simulation for Klein-Gordon equations and Maxwell's equations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The matrix inversion algorithm can be used to find approximate solutions to classical linear field equations after discretizing the field on a spatial lattice and applying a suitable preconditioner.
“For example, we can use this matrix inversion algorithm to find approximate solutions to classical linear field equations [41, 42, 43] (after discretizing the field on a spatial lattice, and applying a suitable preconditioner).”
From Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
Section 2 (p. 3) discretizes the wave equation on a spatial lattice, and §4.3 (p. 12) uses a quantum linear-systems algorithm to prepare a state needed for its solution. But the Introduction (p. 2) explicitly defers analysis of applying preconditioners to the wave equation; it does not support that part of the claim or the broader claim about classical linear field equations generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- [1][1] Dominic W Berry. High-order quantum algorithm for solving linear differential equations. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 47(10):105301, 2014. -
- [2][2] Dominic W. Berry, Andrew M. Childs, Aaron Ostrander, and Guoming Wang. Quantum algorithm for linear differential equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 356(3):1057-1081, Dec 2017. -
- [3][3] Sarah K Leyton and Tobias J Osborne. A quantum algorithm to solve nonlinear differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:0812.4423 , 2008. - · arXiv
- [4][4] Yudong Cao, Anargyros Papageorgiou, Iasonas Petras, Joseph Traub, and Sabre Kais. Quantum algorithm and circuit design solving the poisson equation. New Journal of Physics , 15(1):013021, 2013. -
- [8][8] Andrew M. Childs, Robin Kothari, and Rolando D. Somma. Quantum algorithm for systems of linear equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision. SIAM Journal on Computing , 46(6):19201950, Jan 2017. -
- [9][9] D. W. Berry, A. M. Childs, and R. Kothari. Hamiltonian simulation with nearly optimal dependence on all parameters. In 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science , pages 792-809, Oct 2015. -
- [12][12] Lov Grover and Terry Rudolph. Creating superpositions that correspond to efficiently integrable probability distributions. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0208112 , 2002. - · arXiv
- [13][13] J.R. Dormand and P.J. Prince. A family of embedded runge-kutta formulae. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , 6(1):19 - 26, 1980. -
- [15][15] Colbert Daniel T. and Miller William H. A novel discrete variable representation for quantum mechanical reactive scattering via the s-matrix kohn method. The Journal of chemical physics , 96:1982-1991, 1992. -
- [18][18] Andrews Ben and Clutterbuck Julie. Proof of the fundamental gap conjecture. Journal of the Americal Mathematical Society , 24:899-916, Mar 2011. -
- [19][19] Ambainis Andris. Variable time amplitude amplification and faster quantum algorithm for solving systems of linear equations. arXiv:1010.4458 [quant-ph] , 2012. - · arXiv
- [20][20] Dominic W. Berry, Graeme Ahokas, Richard Cleve, and Barry C. Sanders. Efficient quantum algorithms for simulating sparse hamiltonians. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 270(2):359-371, Mar 2007.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
Metadata
- Authors
- Costa, P. C. S., Jordan, S., & Ostrander, A.
- Affiliations
- Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (BR)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1711.05394
- OpenAlex
- W2770725152
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0016431)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Numerical Solvers for Ordinary Differential Equations
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- quantum algorithms, wave equation, Hamiltonian simulation, Dirichlet boundary conditions, Neumann boundary conditions, Klein-Gordon equation, Maxwell's equations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
