Learning a Rotation Invariant Detector with Rotatable Bounding Box
Open accessAbstract
Detection of arbitrarily rotated objects is a challenging task due to the difficulties of locating the multi-angle objects and separating them effectively from the background. The existing methods are not robust to angle varies of the objects because of the use of traditional bounding box, which is a rotation variant structure for locating rotated objects. In this article, a new detection method is proposed which applies the newly defined rotatable bounding box (RBox). The proposed detector (DRBox) can effectively handle the situation where the orientation angles of the objects are arbitrary. The training of DRBox forces the detection networks to learn the correct orientation angle of the objects, so that the rotation invariant property can be achieved. DRBox is tested to detect vehicles, ships and airplanes on satellite images, compared with Faster R-CNN and SSD, which are chosen as the benchmark of the traditional bounding box based methods. The results shows that DRBox performs much better than traditional bounding box based methods do on the given tasks, and is more robust against rotation of input image and target objects. Besides, results show that DRBox correctly outputs the orientation angles of the objects, which is very useful for locating multi-angle objects efficiently. The code and models are available at https://github.com/liulei01/DRBox.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The MV3D algorithm used camera images, depth images, as well as multi-channel BV images; each channel corresponding to a different range of heights, so as to minimize these occlusions.
“The MV3D algorithm [172] used camera images, depth images, as well as multi-channel BV images; each channel corresponding to a different range of heights, so as to minimize these occlusions.”
From A Survey of Autonomous Driving: <i>Common Practices and Emerging Technologies</i> (2020) · cites this paper as [172]
The Model section (pp. 3–4) describes DRBox and its rotating prior bounding boxes, not MV3D. Searches for MV3D’s camera and depth inputs, height-range BV channels, and occlusion reduction found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 23 · Cited by 166
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- [1][1] X. Chen, R.-X. Gong, L.-L. Xie, S. Xiang, C.-L. Liu, and C.H. Pan. Building regional covariance descriptors for vehicle detection. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , 14(4):524-528, 2017. -
- [2][2] X. Chen, S. Xiang, C.-L. Liu, and C.-H. Pan. Vehicle detection in satellite images by hybrid deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Geoscience and remote sensing letters , 11(10):1797-1801, 2014. -
- [3][3] Z. Chen, C. Wang, H. Luo, H. Wang, Y. Chen, C. Wen, Y. Yu, L. Cao, and J. Li. Vehicle detection in high-resolution aerial images based on fast sparse representation classification and multiorder feature. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 17(8):2296-2309, 2016. -
- [4][4] Z. Chen, C. Wang, C. Wen, X. Teng, Y. Chen, H. Guan, H. Luo, L. Cao, and J. Li. Vehicle detection in highresolution aerial images via sparse representation and superpixels. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 54(1):103-116, 2016. -
- [5][5] G. Cheng, P. Zhou, and J. Han. Learning rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for object detection in vhr optical remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 54(12):7405-7415, 2016. -
- [6][6] J. Dai, Y. Li, K. He, and J. Sun. R-fcn: Object detection via region-based fully convolutional networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 379-387, 2016. -
- [7][7] W. Diao, X. Sun, X. Zheng, F. Dou, H. Wang, and K. Fu. Efficient saliency-based object detection in remote sensing images using deep belief networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , 13(2):137-141, 2016. -
- [8][8] P. F. Felzenszwalb, R. B. Girshick, D. McAllester, and D. Ramanan. Object detection with discriminatively trained partbased models. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 32(9):1627-1645, 2010. -
- [9][9] R. Girshick. Fast r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , pages 1440-1448, 2015. -
- [10][10] R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 580-587, 2014. -
- [11][11] J. Han, D. Zhang, G. Cheng, L. Guo, and J. Ren. Object detection in optical remote sensing images based on weakly supervised learning and high-level feature learning. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 53(6):3325-3337, 2015. -
- [12][12] K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Doll´ ar, and R. Girshick. Mask r-cnn. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.06870 , 2017. - · arXiv
- [13][13] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 346-361. Springer, 2014. -
- [15][15] T.-Y. Lin, P. Doll´ ar, R. Girshick, K. He, B. Hariharan, and S. Belongie. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.03144 , 2016. - · arXiv
- [16][16] W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.Y. Fu, and A. C. Berg. Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. In European conference on computer vision , pages 21-37. Springer, 2016. -
- [17][17] Y. Long, Y. Gong, Z. Xiao, and Q. Liu. Accurate object localization in remote sensing images based on convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 55(5):2486-2498, 2017. -
- [18][18] J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 779-788, 2016. -
- [19][19] S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 91-99, 2015. -
- [20][20] I. ˇ Sevo and A. Avramovi´ c. Convolutional neural network based automatic object detection on aerial images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , 13(5):740-744, 2016. -
- [22][22] H. Sun, X. Sun, H. Wang, Y. Li, and X. Li. Automatic target detection in high-resolution remote sensing images using spatial sparse coding bag-of-words model. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , 9(1):109-113, 2012. -
- [23][23] S. Tuermer, F. Kurz, P. Reinartz, and U. Stilla. Airborne vehicle detection in dense urban areas using hog features and disparity maps. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , 6(6):2327-2337, 2013. -
- [24][24] J. R. Uijlings, K. E. Van De Sande, T. Gevers, and A. W. Smeulders. Selective search for object recognition. International journal of computer vision , 104(2):154-171, 2013. -
- [25][25] L. Wan, L. Zheng, H. Huo, and T. Fang. Affine invariant description and large-margin dimensionality reduction for target detection in optical remote sensing images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , 2017. -
- [26][26] F. Zhang, B. Du, L. Zhang, and M. Xu. Weakly supervised learning based on coupled convolutional neural networks for aircraft detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 54(9):5553-5563, 2016. -
- [27][27] Y. Zhou, Q. Ye, Q. Qiu, and J. Jiao. Oriented response networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , July 2017. -
- [28][28] C. L. Zitnick and P. Doll´ ar. Edge boxes: Locating object proposals from edges. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 391-405. Springer, 2014.
- Authors
- Liu, L., Pan, Z., & Lei, B.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1711.09405
- OpenAlex
- W2770383210
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Object Detection Techniques
- Keywords
- rotated object detection, vehicle detection, ship detection, aircraft detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review