PreprintCited by 51Risk and Portfolio OptimizationSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Bootstrap Robust Prescriptive Analytics

Open access
Bertsimas, Dimitris, Van Parys, Bart·2017·arXiv

Abstract

We address the problem of prescribing an optimal decision in a framework where the cost function depends on uncertain problem parameters that need to be learned from data. Earlier work proposed prescriptive formulations based on supervised machine learning methods. These prescriptive methods can factor in contextual information on a potentially large number of covariates to take context specific actions which are superior to any static decision. When working with noisy or corrupt data, however, such nominal prescriptive methods can be prone to adverse overfitting phenomena and fail to generalize on out-of-sample data. In this paper we combine ideas from robust optimization and the statistical bootstrap to propose novel prescriptive methods which safeguard against overfitting. We show indeed that a particular entropic robust counterpart to such nominal formulations guarantees good performance on synthetic bootstrap data. As bootstrap data is often a sensible proxy to actual out-of-sample data, our robust counterpart can be interpreted to directly encourage good out-of-sample performance. The associated robust prescriptive methods furthermore reduce to convenient tractable convex optimization problems in the context of local learning methods such as nearest neighbors and Nadaraya-Watson learning. We illustrate our data-driven decision-making framework and our novel robustness notion on a small newsvendor problem.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1711.09974

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The full potential of artificial intelligence capabilities for prescriptive analytics has been investigated only conceptually.

    “Up to now, the full potential of these capabilities has been investigated only conceptually (Anderson, 2017;Bertsimas & Van Parys, 2017;Giurgiu et al., 2017;Nechifor, Puiu, Tarnauca, & Moldoveanu, 2015;Shroff et al., 2014;Soltanpoor & Sellis, 2016).”

    From Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges (2020) · cites this paper as Bertsimas & Van Parys, 2017

    Section 5.1, “A Newsvendor Problem,” reports an empirical comparison using synthetic training data and finds that the bootstrap-robust nearest-neighbors formulation outperforms other nonparametric formulations on expected cost and out-of-sample disappointment. Thus this paper's investigation is not only conceptual, although its small synthetic example does not establish whether the full potential of AI for prescriptive analytics has been realized. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bertsimas and Van Parys (2017) proposed a generic robust and adaptive optimization solution.

    “Therefore, Bertsimas and Van Parys (2017) proposed a generic robust and adaptive optimization solution.”

    From Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges (2020) · cites this paper as Bertsimas & Van Parys, 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Altman, N.S. (1992). "An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression". In: The American Statistician 46.3, pp. 175-185.
  2. Ban, G.-Y. and C. Rudin (2019). "The big data newsvendor: Practical insights from machine learning". In: Oper- ations Research 67.1, pp. 90-108.
  3. Ben-Tal, A., D. Den Hertog, A. De Waegenaere, B. Melenberg, and G. Rennen (2013). "Robust solutions of optimization problems affected by uncertain probabilities". In: Management Science 59.2, pp. 341-357.
  4. Bertsimas, D., V. Gupta, and N. Kallus (2017). "Robust sample average approximation". In: Mathematical Pro- gramming, pp. 1-66.
  5. Bertsimas, D. and N. Kallus (2020). "From predictive to prescriptive analytics". In: Management Science 66.3, pp. 1025-1044.
  6. Bezanson, J., A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V.B. Shah (2017). "Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing". In: SIAM Review 59.1, pp. 65-98.
  7. Billingsley, P. (2008). Probability and Measure. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Breiman, L. (2001). "Random forests". In: Machine learning 45.1, pp. 5-32.
  9. Csiszár, I. (1984). "Sanov property, generalized I-projection and a conditional limit theorem". In: The Annals of Probability 12.3, pp. 768-793.
  10. Delage, E. and Y. Ye (2010). "Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems". In: Operations Research 58.3, pp. 595-612.
  11. Dembo, A. and O. Zeitouni (2009). Large deviations techniques and applications. Vol. 38. Springer Science & Business Media.
  12. Domahidi, A., E. Chu, and S. Boyd (2013). "ECOS: An SOCP solver for embedded systems". In: European Control Conference (ECC), pp. 3071-3076.
  13. Erdogan, E. and G. Iyengar (2006). "Ambiguous chance constrained problems and robust optimization". In: Math- ematical Programming 107.1-2, pp. 37-61.
  14. Friedman, J., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani (2001). The Elements of Statistical Learning. Vol. 1. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer.
  15. Györfi, L., M. Kohler, A. Krzyzak, and H. Walk (2006). A Distribution-Free Theory of Nonparametric Regression. Springer Science & Business Media.
  16. Hanasusanto, G.A. and D. Kuhn (2013). "Robust data-driven dynamic programming". In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 827-835.
  17. Hannah, L., W. Powell, and D.M. Blei (2010). "Nonparametric density estimation for stochastic optimization with an observable state variable". In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 820-828.
  18. Kullback, S. and R. A. Leibler (1951). "On information and sufficiency". In: The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22.1, pp. 79-86.
  19. Michaud, R. O. (1989). "The Markowitz optimization enigma: Is 'optimized' optimal?" In: Financial Analysts Journal 45.1, pp. 31-42.
  20. Mohajerin Esfahani, P. and D. Kuhn (2018). "Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wasser- stein metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations". In: Mathematical Programming 171.1-2, pp. 115-166.
  21. Nadaraya, E.A. (1964). "On estimating regression". In: Theory of Probability & Its Applications 9.1, pp. 141-142.
  22. Pflug, G. and D. Wozabal (2007). "Ambiguity in portfolio selection". In: Quantitative Finance 7.4, pp. 435-442.
  23. Popescu, I. (2005). "A semidefinite programming approach to optimal-moment bounds for convex classes of distri- butions". In: Mathematics of Operations Research 30.3, pp. 632-657.
  24. Postek, K., D. den Hertog, and B. Melenberg (2016). "Computationally tractable counterparts of distributionally robust constraints on risk measures". In: SIAM Review 58.4, pp. 603-650.
  25. Sain, S.R. (2002). "Multivariate locally adaptive density estimation". In: Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 39.2, pp. 165-186.
  26. Sun, H. and H. Xu (2016). "Convergence analysis for distributionally robust optimization and equilibrium prob- lems". In: Mathematics of Operations Research 41.2, pp. 377-401.
  27. Udell, M., K. Mohan, D. Zeng, J. Hong, S. Diamond, and S. Boyd (2014). "Convex optimization in Julia". In: SC14 Workshop on High Performance Technical Computing in Dynamic Languages.
  28. Van Parys, B.P.G., P.M. Esfahani, and D. Kuhn (2017). "From data to decisions: Distributionally robust optimiza- tion is optimal". In: ArXiv. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05116. · arXiv
  29. Van Parys, B.P.G., P.J. Goulart, and D. Kuhn (2016). "Generalized Gauss inequalities via semidefinite program- ming". In: Mathematical Programming 156.1-2, pp. 271-302.
  30. Walk, H. (2010). "Strong laws of large numbers and nonparametric estimation". In: Recent Developments in Applied Probability and Statistics. Springer, pp. 183-214.
  31. Wang, Z., P.W. Glynn, and Y. Ye (2016). "Likelihood robust optimization for data-driven newsvendor problems". In: Computational Management Science 12.2, pp. 241-261.
  32. Watson, G.S. (1964). "Smooth regression analysis". In: Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A 26.4, pp. 359-372.
  33. Wiesemann, W., D. Kuhn, and M. Sim (2014). "Distributionally robust convex optimization". In: Operations Research 62.6, pp. 1358-1376.
  34. Zymler, S., D. Kuhn, and B. Rustem (2013). "Distributionally robust joint chance constraints with second-order moment information". In: Mathematical Programming 137.1-2, pp. 167-198.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bertsimas, D., & Van Parys, B.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
Volume
195
Issue
1-2
Pages
39-78
ISSN
0025-5610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769650660
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mathematical Programming (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (165226)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Risk and Portfolio Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Keywords
prescriptive analytics, robust optimization, bootstrapping, overfitting, out-of-sample performance, parameter uncertainty, contextual decision-making, nearest neighbors, Nadaraya-Watson estimator, newsvendor problem, convex optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review