CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 221Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 32 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the task

Open access
Serrà, Joan, Surís, Dídac, Miron, Marius, Karatzoglou, Alexandros·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1801.01423arXiv 1801.01423
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Catastrophic forgetting occurs when a neural network loses the information learned in a previous task after training on subsequent tasks. This problem remains a hurdle for artificial intelligence systems with sequential learning capabilities. In this paper, we propose a task-based hard attention mechanism that preserves previous tasks' information without affecting the current task's learning. A hard attention mask is learned concurrently to every task, through stochastic gradient descent, and previous masks are exploited to condition such learning. We show that the proposed mechanism is effective for reducing catastrophic forgetting, cutting current rates by 45 to 80%. We also show that it is robust to different hyperparameter choices, and that it offers a number of monitoring capabilities. The approach features the possibility to control both the stability and compactness of the learned knowledge, which we believe makes it also attractive for online learning or network compression applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1801.01423

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 34 references

2 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bakker, B. and Heskes, T. Task clustering and gating for bayesian multitask learning. Journal of Machine Learn- ing Research, 4:83-99, 2003.
  2. Clegg, B. A., DiGirolamo, G. J., and Keele, S. W. Sequence learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(8):275-281, 1998.
  3. Glorot, X. and Bengio, Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), pp. 249-256, 2010.
  4. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Pereira, F., Burges, C. J. C., Bottou, L., and Weinberger, K. Q. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), volume 25, pp. 1097-1105. 2012.
  5. LeCun, Y., Denker, J. S., and Solla, S. A. Optimal brain damage. In Touretzky, D. S. (ed.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), volume 2, pp. 598-605.
  6. Morgan Kaufmann, 1990.
  7. Legg, S. and Hutter, M. Universal intelligence: a definition of machine intelligence. Minds and Machines, 17(4): 391-444, 2007.
  8. Lopez-Paz, D. and Ranzato, M. A. Gradient episodic mem- ory for continuum learning. In Guyon, I., Luxburg, U. V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), volume 30, pp. 6449-6458.
  9. Ratcliff, R. Connectionist models of recognition memory: constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological Review, 97:285-308, 1990.
  10. Rebuffi, S., Kolesnikov, A., Sperl, G., and Lampert, C. iCaRL: incremental classifier and representation learn- ing. In Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 2001-2010, 2017.
  11. Rusu, A. A., Rabinowitz, N. C., Desjardins, G., Soyer, H., Kirkpatrick, J., Kavukcuoglu, K., Pascanu, R., and Had- sell, R. Progressive neural networks. ArXiv, 1606.04671, 2016. · arXiv
  12. Stallkamp, J., Schlipsing, M., Salmen, J., and Igel, C. The German traffic sign recognition benchmark: a multi-class classification competition. In Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1453-1460, 2011.
  13. Venkatesan, R., Venkateswara, H., Panchanathan, S., and Li, B. A strategy for an uncompromising incremental learner. ArXiv, 1705.00744, 2017. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 221

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Serrà, J., Surís, D., Miron, M., & Karatzoglou, A.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1801.01423
arXiv
1801.01423
OpenAlex
W2782276075
Semantic Scholar
3aa673abd49f0837ed2fbf5cffcada9ba6f48693
Cited by
213
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 20 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 8
FWCI
9.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
catastrophic forgetting, hard attention, continual learning, sequential learning, attention masks, knowledge preservation, online learning, network compression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review