CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 186Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsHuman Pose and Action RecognitionAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Numerical Coordinate Regression with Convolutional Neural Networks

Open access
Nibali, Aiden, He, Zhen, Morgan, Stuart, Prendergast, Luke·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1801.07372arXiv 1801.07372
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We study deep learning approaches to inferring numerical coordinates for points of interest in an input image. Existing convolutional neural network-based solutions to this problem either take a heatmap matching approach or regress to coordinates with a fully connected output layer. Neither of these approaches is ideal, since the former is not entirely differentiable, and the latter lacks inherent spatial generalization. We propose our differentiable spatial to numerical transform (DSNT) to fill this gap. The DSNT layer adds no trainable parameters, is fully differentiable, and exhibits good spatial generalization. Unlike heatmap matching, DSNT works well with low heatmap resolutions, so it can be dropped in as an output layer for a wide range of existing fully convolutional architectures. Consequently, DSNT offers a better trade-off between inference speed and prediction accuracy compared to existing techniques. When used to replace the popular heatmap matching approach used in almost all state-of-the-art methods for pose estimation, DSNT gives better prediction accuracy for all model architectures tested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1801.07372

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [1][1] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, 'Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,' in Advances in neural information processing systems , 2012, pp. 1097-1105. -
  2. [5][5] Y. LeCun, B. E. Boser, J. S. Denker, D. Henderson, R. E. Howard, W. E. Hubbard, and L. D. Jackel, 'Handwritten digit recognition with a backpropagation network,' in Advances in neural information processing systems , 1990, pp. 396-404. -
  3. [6][6] M. Lin, Q. Chen, and S. Yan, 'Network in network,' in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2014. -
  4. [8][8] M. Jaderberg, K. Simonyan, A. Zisserman et al. , 'Spatial transformer networks,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2015, pp. 2017-2025. -
  5. [9][9] J. J. Tompson, A. Jain, Y. LeCun, and C. Bregler, 'Joint training of a convolutional network and a graphical model for human pose estimation,' in Advances in neural information processing systems , 2014, pp. 1799-1807. -
  6. [16][16] S. Levine, C. Finn, T. Darrell, and P. Abbeel, 'End-toend training of deep visuomotor policies,' Journal of Machine Learning Research , vol. 17, no. 39, pp. 1-40, 2016. -
  7. [20][20] I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, 'Generative adversarial nets,' in Advances in neural information processing systems , 2014, pp. 26722680. -
  8. [22][22] J. Tompson, R. Goroshin, A. Jain, Y. LeCun, and C. Bregler, 'Efficient object localization using convolutional networks,' in The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2015, pp. 648656. -
  9. [23][23] T. Tieleman and G. Hinton, 'Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude,' COURSERA: Neural networks for machine learning , vol. 4, no. 2, 2012. -
  10. [24][24] U. Rafi, B. Leibe, J. Gall, and I. Kostrikov, 'An efficient convolutional network for human pose estimation.' in BMVC , vol. 1, 2016, p. 2. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nibali, A., He, Z., Morgan, S., & Prendergast, L.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1801.07372
arXiv
1801.07372
OpenAlex
W2784710428
Cited by
186
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
points of interest, human pose estimation, spatial generalization, fully convolutional network, inference speed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review