PreprintCited by 823Millimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies

Deep Learning-based Channel Estimation for Beamspace mmWave Massive MIMO Systems

Open access
He, Hengtao, Wen, Chao-Kai, Jin, Shi, Li, Geoffrey Ye·2018·arXiv

Abstract

Channel estimation is very challenging when the receiver is equipped with a limited number of radio-frequency (RF) chains in beamspace millimeter-wave (mmWave) massive multiple-input and multiple-output systems. To solve this problem, we exploit a learned denoising-based approximate message passing (LDAMP) network. This neural network can learn channel structure and estimate channel from a large number of training data. Furthermore, we provide an analytical framework on the asymptotic performance of the channel estimator. Based on our analysis and simulation results, the LDAMP neural network significantly outperforms state-of-the-art compressed sensingbased algorithms even when the receiver is equipped with a small number of RF chains. Therefore, deep learning is a powerful tool for channel estimation in mmWave communications.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1802.01290

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One potential application of DL in mmWave M-MIMO systems is estimation of radio channel quality.

    “One of the potential applications of employing DL methods in such mmWave M-MIMO systems is the estimation of radio channel quality [23], which is essential for the design of transmission techniques such as beamforming.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, H., Wen, C.-K., Jin, S., & Li, G. Y.
Affiliations
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
852-855
ISSN
2162-2337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963290405
Cited by
823
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 13
FWCI
31.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Wireless Communications Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61625106, 61531011)
  • Industrial Technology Research Institute
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST106-2221-E110-019, 106-2221-E-, 2221-E-110, MOST 106)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Keywords
channel estimation, millimeter-wave communication, RF chain reduction, compressed sensing, asymptotic performance analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review