Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence
Open accessAbstract
It is undeniable that artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain concepts are spreading at a phenomenal rate. Both technologies have distinct degree of technological complexity and multi-dimensional business implications. However, a common misunderstanding about blockchain concept, in particular, is that blockchain is decentralized and is not controlled by anyone. But the underlying development of a blockchain system is still attributed to a cluster of core developers. Take smart contract as an example, it is essentially a collection of codes (or functions) and data (or states) that are programmed and deployed on a blockchain (say, Ethereum) by different human programmers. It is thus, unfortunately, less likely to be free of loopholes and flaws. In this article, through a brief overview about how artificial intelligence could be used to deliver bug-free smart contract so as to achieve the goal of blockchain 2.0, we to emphasize that the blockchain implementation can be assisted or enhanced via various AI techniques. The alliance of AI and blockchain is expected to create numerous possibilities.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI-based testing methods not only enhance processing time but also improve the accuracy of randomness assessment processes by providing more comprehensive and reliable analyses.
“In this way, AI-based testing methods not only enhance processing time but also improve the accuracy of randomness assessment processes by providing more comprehensive and reliable analyses”
From A novel deep learning-based statistical randomness evaluation test methodology for cryptographic applications (2025) · cites this paper as Marwala and Xing 2018
Section 2.3 discusses AI-assisted smart-contract testing, while section 3.5 discusses faster resource estimation in blockchain networks. Neither addresses randomness assessment or shows that AI-based testing improves its processing time, accuracy, or reliability; searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. No page numbers were provided. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 9 · Cited by 62
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- T. Marwala and E. Hurwitz, "Introduction to man and machines," in Artificial intelligence and economic theory: skynet in the market, T. Marwala and E. Hurwitz, Eds., ed Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, ISBN 978-3-319-66103-2, Chapter 1, pp. 1-14, 2017.
- M. Swan, Blockchain: blueprint for a new economy. 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472: O'Reilly Media, Inc., ISBN 978-1-491-92049-7, 2015.
- The Economist, "The DAO: theft is property," The Economist, vol. 419, No. 8995, p. 66, 2016.
- S. Powers, JavaScript cookbook, 2 nd ed. 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472: O'Reilly Media, Inc., ISBN 978-1-491-90188-5, 2015.
- S. Ray, Scalable techniques for formal verification. New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, ISBN 978-1-4419-5997-3, 2010.
- W. Afzal, R. Torkar, and R. Feldt, "A systematic review of search-based testing for non-functional system properties," Information and Software Technology, vol. 51, pp. 957-976, 2009.
- S. Ali, L. C. Briand, H. Hemmati, and R. K. Panesar-Walawege, "A systematic review of the application and empirical investigation of search-based test-case generation," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 36, pp. 742-762, 2010.
- P. McMinn, "Search-based software test data generation: a survey," Journal of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, vol. 14, pp. 105-156, 2004.
- S. Yoo and M. Harman, "Regression testing minimisation, selection and prioritisation: a survey," Journal of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, vol. 22, pp. 67120, 2012.
- W. Pedrycz, G. Succi, and A. Sillitti, Computational intelligence and quantitative software engineering. Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, ISBN 978-3-319-25962-8, 2016.
- R. Malhotra, Empirical research in software engineering: concepts, analysis, and applications. 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300, Boca Raton, FL 334872742: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, ISBN 978-1-4987-1973-5, 2016.
- B. Xing and W.-J. Gao, Innovative computational intelligence: a rough guide to 134 clever algorithms. Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, ISBN: 978-3-319-03403-4, 2014b.
- B. Xing and T. Marwala, "Introduction to intelligent search algorithms," in Smart Maintenance for Human-Robot Interaction: An Intelligent Search Algorithmic Perspective, B. Xing and T. Marwala, Eds., ed Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, ISBN 978-3-319-67479-7, Chapter 3, pp. 33-64, 2018.
- C. Peng, D. Yue, and Q.-L. Han, Communication and control for networked complex systems. Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-662-46812-8, 2015.
- G. Indiveri, "Neuromorphic engineering," in Springer Handbook of Computational Intelligence, J. Kacprzyk and W. Pedrycz, Eds., ed Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-662-43504-5, Part D Neural Networks, Chapter 38, pp. 715-725, 2015.
- M. Suri, Advances in neuromorphic hardware exploiting emerging nanoscale devices. 7th Floor,VijayaBuilding, 17 BarakhambaRoad,NewDelhi 110 001, India: Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd., ISBN 978-81-322-3701-3, 2017.
- Authors
- Marwala, T., & Xing, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Johannesburg (ZA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1802.04451
- OpenAlex
- W2786708475
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- blockchain, artificial intelligence, smart contracts, Ethereum, smart contract vulnerabilities, automated defect detection, decentralized systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
