Loss-aware Weight Quantization of Deep Networks
Open accessAbstract
The huge size of deep networks hinders their use in small computing devices. In this paper, we consider compressing the network by weight quantization. We extend a recently proposed loss-aware weight binarization scheme to ternarization, with possibly different scaling parameters for the positive and negative weights, and m-bit (where m > 2) quantization. Experiments on feedforward and recurrent neural networks show that the proposed scheme outperforms state-of-the-art weight quantization algorithms, and is as accurate (or even more accurate) than the full-precision network.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-STE methods use regularization to force weights to quantized values, avoiding the non-differentiable quantization operator.
“Another different class of alternative methods tries to use regularization operators to enforce the weight to be quantized.This removes the need to use the non-differentiable quantization operator in Eq. 2. These are often referred to as Non-STE methods [4, 8, 39, 99, 144, 184, 283].”
From A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference (2022) · cites this paper as [99]
The Conclusion (p. 9) says the method explicitly uses a quantization step that projects full-precision weights onto quantized values; Section 3.1 (p. 4) defines that projection operator. Although Section 4 (p. 6) calls quantization a form of regularization, the paper does not describe using a regularization operator instead of quantization. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe second branch of solutions focuses on the choice of loss function.
“b) Improved Loss function: Another branch of works focuses on the choice of loss function [48,98,99,251,284].”
From A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference (2022) · cites this paper as [99]
The Introduction (p. 2) and Conclusion (p. 9) say the method explicitly considers how weight quantization affects the loss. They do not describe choosing or improving the loss function itself; the work focuses on the quantization algorithm. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLoss-aware binarization and ternarization directly minimize the loss with respect to binarized or ternarized weights.
“Important works here are loss-aware binarization and ternarization [98,99] that directly minimize the loss with respect to the binarized/ternatized weights.”
From A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference (2022) · cites this paper as [99]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Li, F., Liu, B., Wang, X., Zhang, B., & Yan, J. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.04711 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [7]7. Theano Development Team. Theano: A Python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions. Preprint arXiv:1605.02688, 2016. - F. P. Vasilyev, E. V. Khoroshilova, and A. S. Antipin. An extragradient method for finding the saddle point in an optimal control problem. Moscow University Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics , 34(3):113-118, 2010. - X. Zhang, X. Zhou, M. Lin, and J. Sun. ShuffleNet: An extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices. Preprint arXiv:1707.01083, 2017. - S. Zhou, Z. Ni, X. Zhou, H. Wen, Y. Wu, and Y. Zou. DoReFa-Net: Training low bitwidth convolutional neural networks with low bitwidth gradients. Preprint arXiv:1606.06160, 2016. - C. Zhu, S. Han, H. Mao, and W. J. Dally. Trained ternary quantization. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2017. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference
Gholami, A., Kim, S., Dong, Z., Yao, Z., Mahoney, M. W., & Keutzer, K. (2022) · Low-Power Computer Vision · doi:10.1201/9781003162810-13 · Cited by 1,219 · see citing works
“Important works here are loss-aware binarization and ternarization [97, 98] that directly minimize the loss with respect to the binarized/ternatized weights.”
- Authors
- Hou, L., & Kwok, J. T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1802.08635
- OpenAlex
- W2786548044
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- International Conference on Learning Representations
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- weight quantization, weight binarization, neural network compression, recurrent neural networks, feedforward neural networks, low-precision arithmetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
