Some Considerations on Learning to Explore via Meta-Reinforcement Learning
Open accessAbstract
We consider the problem of exploration in meta reinforcement learning. Two new meta reinforcement learning algorithms are suggested: E-MAML and E-$\text{RL}^2$. Results are presented on a novel environment we call `Krazy World' and a set of maze environments. We show E-MAML and E-$\text{RL}^2$ deliver better performance on tasks where exploration is important.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only the no longer maintained KrazyWorld focuses on meta-learning among existing grid world benchmarks.
“Despite the great variety of benefits of the existing grid world benchmarks, to the best of our knowledge, only the no longer maintained KrazyWorld (Stadie et al., 2018) focuses on meta-learning.”
From XLand-MiniGrid: Scalable Meta-Reinforcement Learning Environments in JAX (2024) · cites this paper as Stadie et al., 2018
The Abstract (p. 1) identifies Krazy World as a gridworld designed for meta-reinforcement learning, and §4.1 (p. 5) describes its use to test meta-learning. The paper does not establish that it is the only such benchmark or that it is no longer maintained. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 74
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- [1][1] Anonymous. Promp: Proximal meta-policy search . ICLR Submission , 2019. -
- [2][2] Bacon, P. and Precup, D. The option-critic architecture . In NIPS Deep RL Workshop , 2015. -
- [4][4] Bellemare, M., Srinivasan, S., Ostrovski, G., Schaul, T., Saxton, D., and Munos, R. Unifying count based exploration and intrinsic motivation . NIPS , 2016. -
- [5][5] Brafman, R. I. and Tennenholtz, M. R-max - a general polynomial time algorithm for near-optimal reinforcement learning . Journal of Machine Learning Research , 2002. -
- [7][7] Finn, C., Abbeel, P., and Levine, S. Model-agnostic metalearning for fast adaptation of deep networks . ICML , 2017. -
- [8][8] Graziano, Vincent, Glasmachers, Tobias, Schaul, Tom, Pape, Leo, Cuccu, Giuseppe, Leitner, Jurgen, and Schmidhuber, Jürgen. Artificial Curiosity for Autonomous Space Exploration . Acta Futura , 1(1):41-51, 2011. doi: 10.2420/AF04.2011.41. URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2420/AF04.2011.41 . - · DOI
- [9][9] Houthooft, R., Chen, X., Duan, Y., Schulman, J., De Turck, F., and Abbeel, P. Vime: Variational information maximizing exploration . NIPS , 2016. -
- [18][18] Osband, I., Blundell, C., Pritzel, A., and Van Roy, B. Deep exploration via bootstrapped dqn . NIPS , 2016. -
- [21][21] Schmidhuber. Evolutionary principles in self-referential learning, or on learning how to learn: The meta-meta-... hook . Diploma thesis, TUM , 1987. -
- [25][25] Schmidhuber, Juergen. On Learning to Think: Algorithmic Information Theory for Novel Combinations of Reinforcement Learning Controllers and Recurrent Neural World Models . pp. 1-36, 2015. ISSN 10450823. doi: 1511.09249v1. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1511.09249 . -
- [26][26] Schmidhuber, Jürgen. A Possibility for Implementing Curiosity and Boredom in ModelBuilding Neural Controllers . Meyer, J.A. and Wilson, S.W. (eds) : From Animals to animats , pp. 222-227, 1991. -
- [29][29] Schulman, John a/snd Heess, Nicolas, Weber, Theophane, and Abbeel, Pieter. Gradient estimation using stochastic computation graphs . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 3528-3536, 2015. -
- [30][30] Silver, Yand, and Li. Lifelong machine learning systems: Beyond learning algorithms . DAAAI Spring Symposium-Technical Report, 2013. , 2013. -
- [32][32] Storck, Jan, Hochreiter, Sepp, and Schmidhuber, Jürgen. Reinforcement driven information acquisition in non-deterministic environments . Proceedings of the International . . . , 2: 159-164, 1995. -
- [35][35] Taylor and Stone. Transfer learning for reinforcement learning domains: A survey . DAAAI Spring Symposium-Technical Report, 2013. , 2009. -
- [37][37] Thrun. Is learning the n-th thing any easier than learning the first? NIPS , 1996. -
- Authors
- Stadie, B. C., Yang, G., Houthooft, R., Chen, X., Duan, Y., Wu, Y., Abbeel, P., & Sutskever, I.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1803.01118
- OpenAlex
- W2785397462
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- meta-reinforcement learning, exploration, meta-learner
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
