CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 21Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionEthics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

Facebook's Advertising Platform: New Attack Vectors and the Need for Interventions

Open access
Faizullabhoy, Irfan, Korolova, Aleksandra·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1803.10099arXiv 1803.10099
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Ad targeting is getting more powerful with introduction of new tools, such as Custom Audiences, behavioral targeting, and Audience Insights. Although this is beneficial for businesses as it enables people to receive more relevant advertising, the power of the tools has downsides. In this paper, we focus on three downsides: privacy violations, microtargeting (i.e., the ability to reach a specific individual or individuals without their explicit knowledge that they are the only ones an ad reaches) and ease of reaching marginalized groups. Using Facebook's ad system as a case study, we demonstrate the feasibility of such downsides. We then discuss Facebook's response to our responsible disclosures of the findings and call for additional policy, science, and engineering work to protect consumers in the rapidly evolving ecosystem of ad targeting.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1803.10099

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The comparisons presented are statistically significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple hypotheses testing.

    “Finally, as we present in the Appendix, the comparisons presented are statistically significant also after the application of Bonferroni correction [14] for multiple hypotheses testing.”

    From Discrimination through Optimization (2019) · cites this paper as [14]

  • The study used the Bonferroni correction to address the problem of making multiple comparisons.

    “we use the Bonferroni correction [14], a statistical technique used to address the problem of making multiple comparisons.”

    From Discrimination through Optimization (2019) · cites this paper as [14]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faizullabhoy, I., & Korolova, A.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
ORCID
Korolova, Aleksandra
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1803.10099
arXiv
1803.10099
OpenAlex
W2794558831
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
targeted advertising, microtargeting, privacy violations, behavioral targeting, audience insights, marginalized communities, responsible disclosure, consumer protection, advertising policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review