Emergence of Linguistic Communication from Referential Games with Symbolic and Pixel Input
Open accessAbstract
The ability of algorithms to evolve or learn (compositional) communication protocols has traditionally been studied in the language evolution literature through the use of emergent communication tasks. Here we scale up this research by using contemporary deep learning methods and by training reinforcement-learning neural network agents on referential communication games. We extend previous work, in which agents were trained in symbolic environments, by developing agents which are able to learn from raw pixel data, a more challenging and realistic input representation. We find that the degree of structure found in the input data affects the nature of the emerged protocols, and thereby corroborate the hypothesis that structured compositional language is most likely to emerge when agents perceive the world as being structured.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The emergent communication framework is well-suited to model the role of pragmatics in communication.
“The emergent communication framework is well-suited to model the role of pragmatics in communication [36,41,56,57].”
From The role of pragmatic mechanisms in referential communication and categorization: An emergent communication model (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
Section 3.2 (p. 5) uses referential games to test how the distribution of distractors affects emergent messages, supporting the framework’s ability to model a contextual aspect of communication. The paper does not explicitly evaluate whether the framework is well-suited to modeling pragmatics more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe number of unique messages used to refer to concepts is an approximation to the agents' lexicon size.
“We also calculate the number of unique messages used to refer to concepts as an approximation to the agents’ lexicon size [36].”
From The role of pragmatic mechanisms in referential communication and categorization: An emergent communication model (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
During several iterations of training, agents converge on a language-like system, i.e., a consistent mapping between targets and messages.
“During several iterations of training, the agents converge on a language-like system, i.e., a consistent mapping between targets and messages [35,36].”
From The role of pragmatic mechanisms in referential communication and categorization: An emergent communication model (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
The communicative function of ambiguity in language
Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Emergence of grounded compositional language in multi-agent populations
Mordatch, I., & Abbeel, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11492 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Natural language does not emerge ‘naturally’ in multi-agent dialog
Kottur, S., Moura, J., Lee, S., & Batra, D. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1321 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Jacob Andreas and Dan Klein. Analogs of linguistic structure in deep representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.08139, 2017. · arXiv
- Trapit Bansal, Jakub Pachocki, Szymon Sidor, Ilya Sutskever, and Igor Mordatch. Emergent com- plexity via multi-agent competition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.03748, 2017. · arXiv
- John Batali. Computational simulations of the emergence of grammar. pp. 405–426, 1998.
- Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville, and Pascal Vincent. Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 35(8):1798–1828, 2013.
- Susan E Brennan and Herbert H Clark. Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6):1482, 1996.
- Henry Brighton. Compositional syntax from cultural transmission. Artificial life, 8(1):25–54, 2002.
- Henry Brighton and Simon Kirby. Understanding linguistic evolution by visualizing the emergence of topographic mappings. Artificial life, 12(2):229–242, 2006.
- Ted Briscoe (ed.). Linguistic evolution through language acquisition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.
- Angelo Cangelosi and Domenico Parisi (eds.). Simulating the evolution of language. Springer, New York, 2002.
- Jon W Carr, Kenny Smith, Hannah Cornish, and Simon Kirby. The cultural evolution of structured languages in an open-ended, continuous world. Cognitive science, 41(4):892–923, 2017.
- Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on, pp. 248–255. IEEE, 2009.
- Katrina Evtimova, Andrew Drozdov, Douwe Kiela, and Kyunghyun Cho. Emergent language in a multi-modal, multi-step referential game. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.10369, 2017. · arXiv
- Michael Franke. The evolution of compositionality in signaling games. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, pp. 1–23, 2015.
- Simon Garrod and Martin J Pickering. Why is conversation so easy? Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(1):8–11, 2004.
- Serhii Havrylov and Ivan Titov. Emergence of language with multi-agent games: Learning to com- municate with sequences of symbols. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.11192, 2017. · arXiv
- Karl Moritz Hermann, Felix Hill, Simon Green, Fumin Wang, Ryan Faulkner, Hubert Soyer, David Szepesvari, Wojtek Czarnecki, Max Jaderberg, Denis Teplyashin, et al. Grounded language learn- ing in a simulated 3d world. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06551, 2017. · arXiv
- Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8): 1735–1780, 1997.
- Sahar Kazemzadeh, Vicente Ordonez, Mark Matten, and Tamara L Berg. Referitgame: Referring to objects in photographs of natural scenes. In EMNLP, pp. 787–798, 2014.
- Angeliki Lazaridou, Alexander Peysakhovich, and Marco Baroni. Multi-agent cooperation and the emergence of (natural) language. In ICLR, 2017.
- David Lewis. Convention. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1969.
- Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In European conference on computer vision, pp. 740–755. Springer, 2014.
- Volodymyr Mnih, Adria Puigdomenech Badia, Mehdi Mirza, Alex Graves, Timothy Lillicrap, Tim Harley, David Silver, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1928–1937, 2016.
- Martin A Nowak and David C Krakauer. The evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(14):8028–8033, 1999.
- Carina Silberer, Vittorio Ferrari, and Mirella Lapata. Models of semantic representation with visual attributes. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 572–582, Sofia, Bulgaria, August 2013. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P13-1056.
- Brian Skyrms. Signals: Evolution, learning, and information. Oxford University Press, 2010.
- Kenny Smith, Simon Kirby, and Henry Brighton. Iterated learning: A framework for the emergence of language. Artificial life, 9(4):371–386, 2003.
- Matthew Spike, Kevin Stadler, Simon Kirby, and Kenny Smith. Minimal requirements for the emer- gence of learned signaling. Cognitive Science, 2016. In press.
- Luc Steels. Social language learning. In Mario Tokoro and Luc Steels (eds.), The Future of Learning, pp. 133–162. IOS, Amsterdam, 2003.
- Luc Steels and Martin Loetzsch. The grounded naming game. In Luc Steels (ed.), Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution, pp. 41–59. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 2012.
- Emanuel Todorov, Tom Erez, and Yuval Tassa. Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pp. 5026– 5033. IEEE, 2012.
- Kyle Wagner, James A Reggia, Juan Uriagereka, and Gerald S Wilkinson. Progress in the simulation of emergent communication and language. Adaptive Behavior, 11(1):37–69, 2003.
- Ronald J. Williams. Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforce- ment learning. Mach. Learn., 8(3-4):229–256, May 1992. ISSN 0885-6125. doi: 10.1007/ BF00992696. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992696. · DOI
- Ludwig Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1953. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P13-1056 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992696 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populations
Ashery, A. F., Aiello, L. M., & Baronchelli, A. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adu9368 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“Further promising research avenues include developing frameworks to promote the emergence of specific conventions ( 35 ) and higher-order social norms ( 36 , 65 ), as well as testing interactions between agents based on different LLMs within populations.”
“LazImpa”: Lazy and impatient neural agents learn to communicate efficiently
Rita, M., Chaabouni, R., & Dupoux, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.conll-1.26 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Towards Human-Like Emergent Communication via Utility, Informativeness, and Complexity
Tucker, M., Shah, J., Levy, R., & Zaslavsky, N. (2025) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00188 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Kobrock, K., Ohmer, X., Bruni, E., & Gotzner, N. (2026) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014326
- Authors
- Lazaridou, A., Hermann, K. M., Tuyls, K., & Clark, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Trento (IT)
- Google (United States) (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1804.03984
- OpenAlex
- W2787615430
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- International Conference on Learning Representations
- Funders
- DeepMind
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- emergent communication, compositional language, language evolution, reinforcement learning, input structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review