Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edge
Open accessAbstract
We envision a mobile edge computing (MEC) framework for machine learning (ML) technologies, which leverages distributed client data and computation resources for training high-performance ML models while preserving client privacy. Toward this future goal, this work aims to extend Federated Learning (FL), a decentralized learning framework that enables privacy-preserving training of models, to work with heterogeneous clients in a practical cellular network. The FL protocol iteratively asks random clients to download a trainable model from a server, update it with own data, and upload the updated model to the server, while asking the server to aggregate multiple client updates to further improve the model. While clients in this protocol are free from disclosing own private data, the overall training process can become inefficient when some clients are with limited computational resources (i.e. requiring longer update time) or under poor wireless channel conditions (longer upload time). Our new FL protocol, which we refer to as FedCS, mitigates this problem and performs FL efficiently while actively managing clients based on their resource conditions. Specifically, FedCS solves a client selection problem with resource constraints, which allows the server to aggregate as many client updates as possible and to accelerate performance improvement in ML models. We conducted an experimental evaluation using publicly-available large-scale image datasets to train deep neural networks on MEC environment simulations. The experimental results show that FedCS is able to complete its training process in a significantly shorter time compared to the original FL protocol.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By setting a certain deadline for clients to download, update, and upload DL models, the central server can determine which clients to perform local training such that it can aggregate as many client updates as possible in each period, thus allowing the server to accelerate performance improvement in DL models.
“By setting a certain deadline for clients to download, update, and upload DL models, the central server can determine which clients to perform local training such that it can aggregate as many client updates as possible in each period, thus allowing the server to accelerate performance improvement in DL models [283].”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [283]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- [1][1] J. Choi, V. Va, N. Gonzalez-Prelcic, R. Daniels, C. R. Bhat, and R. W. Heath, 'Millimeter-wave vehicular communication to support massive automotive sensing,' IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 160167, Dec. 2016. -
- [3][3] X. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Song, and A. Liu, 'Big data orchestration as a service network,' IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 94-101, Sept. 2017. -
- [4][4] S. Kato and R. Shinkuma, 'Priority control in communication networks for accuracy-freshness tradeoff in real-time road-traffic information delivery,' IEEE Access , vol. 5, pp. 25 226-25 235, Oct. 2017. -
- [5][5] H. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, 'Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,' in Proc. of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , Apr. 2017. -
- [6][6] T. Nishio, R. Shinkuma, T. Takahashi, and N. B. Mandayam, 'Serviceoriented heterogeneous resource sharing for optimizing service latency in mobile cloud,' in Proc. of the International Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing & Networking , July 2013, pp. 19-26. -
- [7][7] S. Sardellitti, G. Scutari, and S. Barbarossa, 'Joint optimization of radio and computational resources for multicell mobile-edge computing,' IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks , vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 89-103, June 2015. -
- [8][8] Y. Yu, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, 'Joint subcarrier and CPU time allocation for mobile edge computing,' in Proc. of the IEEE Globecom , Dec. 2016, pp. 1-6. -
- [9][9] K. Bonawitz, V. Ivanov, B. Kreuter, A. Marcedone, H. B. McMahan, S. Patel, D. Ramage, A. Segal, and K. Seth, 'Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning,' in Proc. of the ACM CCS , Oct. 2017, pp. 1175-1191. -
- [10][10] R. C. Geyer, T. Klein, and M. Nabi, 'Differentially private federated learning: A client level perspective,' CoRR , vol. abs/1712.07557, 2017. - · arXiv
- [11][11] J. Konecn´ y, H. B. McMahan, F. X. Yu, P. Richt´ arik, A. T. Suresh, and D. Bacon, 'Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency,' in Proc. of the NIPS Workshop on Private Multi-Party Machine Learning , Dec. 2016. -
- [12][12] S. Wang, T. Tuor, T. Salonidis, K. K. Leung, C. Makaya, T. He, and K. Chan, 'When edge meets learning: Adaptive control for resourceconstrained distributed machine learning,' in Proc. of the IEEE INFOCOM , Apr. 2018. -
- [13][13] S. Sesia, M. Baker, and I. Toufik, LTE-the UMTS Long Term Evolution: From Theory to Practice . John Wiley & Sons, 2011. -
- [14][14] M. Sviridenko, 'A note on maximizing a submodular set function subject to a knapsack constraint,' Operations Research Letters , vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 41-43, Jan. 2004. -
- [16][16] M. R. Akdeniz, Y. Liu, M. K. Samimi, S. Sun, S. Rangan, T. S. Rappaport, and E. Erkip, 'Millimeter wave channel modeling and cellular capacity evaluation,' IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1164-1179, June 2014. -
- [17][17] H. Xiao, K. Rasul, and R. Vollgraf, 'Fashion-MNIST: a novel image dataset for benchmarking machine learning algorithms,' CoRR , vol. abs/1708.07747, 2017. - · arXiv
- [18][18] Y. Zhao, M. Li, L. Lai, N. Suda, D. Civin, and V. Chandra, 'Federated learning with non-iid data,' CoRR , vol. abs/1806.00582, 2018. - · arXiv
- [19][19] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, 'Deep residual learning for image recognition,' in Proc. of the IEEE CVPR , Dec. 2016, pp. 171-180. -
- [20][20] Y. Yamada, M. Iwamura, and K. Kise, 'Shakedrop regularization,' CoRR , vol. abs/1802.02375, 2018. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence With Edge Computing
Zhou, Z., Chen, X., Li, E., Zeng, L., Luo, K., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2918951 · Cited by 2,455 · see citing works
Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2970550 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nishio, T., & Yonetani, R.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Omron (Japan) (JP)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 1-7
- ISSN
- 1550-3607 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1804.08333
- OpenAlex
- W2798720628
- Cited by
- 1,875
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 186 · 2025: 284 · 2024: 331 · 2023: 346 · 2022: 301 · 2021: 257 · 2020: 143 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 69.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- International Conference on Communications (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- federated learning, client selection, mobile edge computing, resource-constrained clients, wireless channel conditions, privacy-preserving machine learning, deep neural network training, cellular networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review