The DOI matches its DataCite record; 84 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
False Information on Web and Social Media: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
False information can be created and spread easily through the web and social media platforms, resulting in widespread real-world impact. Characterizing how false information proliferates on social platforms and why it succeeds in deceiving readers are critical to develop efficient detection algorithms and tools for early detection. A recent surge of research in this area has aimed to address the key issues using methods based on feature engineering, graph mining, and information modeling. Majority of the research has primarily focused on two broad categories of false information: opinion-based (e.g., fake reviews), and fact-based (e.g., false news and hoaxes). Therefore, in this work, we present a comprehensive survey spanning diverse aspects of false information, namely (i) the actors involved in spreading false information, (ii) rationale behind successfully deceiving readers, (iii) quantifying the impact of false information, (iv) measuring its characteristics across different dimensions, and finally, (iv) algorithms developed to detect false information. In doing so, we create a unified framework to describe these recent methods and highlight a number of important directions for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Hence, fake news can have a significant impact on society as manipulated and false content is easier to generate and harder to detect (Kumar and Shah 2018)”
From Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Kumar and Shah 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“as disinformation actors change their tactics (Kumar and Shah 2018; Micallef et al. 2020).”
From Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Kumar and Shah 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847 · cited 5×
“58], Jin et al. [41], Kumar et al. [50], Mendoza et al. [57] Mukherjee et al. [61], Rayana et al. [79], Nied et al. [66], Shao et al. [86,87] , Shah et al. [84] Tacchini et al. [100], Vosoughi et al. [105], Yang et al. [112] Graph Lin et al. [55], Minnich et al. [58], Bessi et al. [13], Davis et al. [21], Friggeri et…”
BackgroundInfluentialConfirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267
Twitter mood predicts the stock market
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007 · Cited by 5,206
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · Cited by 3,173
Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments
Asch, S. E. (1961) · Documents of Gestalt Psychology · doi:10.1525/9780520313514-017 · Cited by 2,644
The spreading of misinformation online
Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1517441113 · Cited by 2,407
"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection
Wang, W. Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-2067 · Cited by 2,010
Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2818717 · Cited by 1,973
Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter
Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining · doi:10.1145/1935826.1935845 · Cited by 1,689
Jindal, N., & Liu, B. (2008) · Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining - WSDM '08 · doi:10.1145/1341531.1341560 · Cited by 1,542
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [3][3] Daron Acemoglu, Asuman Ozdaglar, and Ali ParandehGheibi. Spread of (mis) information in social networks. Games and Economic Behavior , 70(2):194-227, 2010. -
- [5][5] Leman Akoglu, Rishi Chandy, and Christos Faloutsos. Opinion fraud detection in online reviews by network effects. Proceedings of the 7th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media , 2013. -
- [6][6] Leman Akoglu, Mary McGlohon, and Christos Faloutsos. Oddball: Spotting anomalies in weighted graphs. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . Springer, 2010. -
- [12][12] Tim Berners-Lee, Robert Cailliau, Jean-François Groff, and Bernd Pollermann. World-wide web: The information universe. Internet Research , 20(4):461-471, 2010. -
- [15][15] Alex Beutel, Kenton Murray, Christos Faloutsos, and Alexander J Smola. CoBaFi: collaborative bayesian filtering. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web . ACM, 2014. -
- [16][16] Alex Beutel, Wanhong Xu, Venkatesan Guruswami, Christopher Palow, and Christos Faloutsos. Copycatch: stopping group attacks by spotting lockstep behavior in social networks. In Proceedings of the 22rd International Conference on World Wide Web . ACM, 2013. -
- [18][18] Ceren Budak, Divyakant Agrawal, and Amr El Abbadi. Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web . ACM, 2011. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Lee, D., & Liu, H. (2018) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2020.0062 · Cited by 1,362
FakeBERT: Fake news detection in social media with a BERT-based deep learning approach
Kaliyar, R. K., Goswami, A., & Narang, P. (2021) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-020-10183-2 · Cited by 890
Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review
Aïmeur, E., Amri, S., & Brassard, G. (2023) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5 · Cited by 772
Fake news detection: A hybrid CNN-RNN based deep learning approach
Nasir, J. A., Khan, O. S., & Varlamis, I. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2020.100007 · Cited by 568
Kumar, S., Hooi, B., Makhija, D., Kumar, M., Faloutsos, C., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3159652.3159729 · Cited by 381
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, S., & Shah, N.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1804.08559
- OpenAlex
- W2799165947
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2025: 15 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 10
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- misinformation, fake news detection, hoaxes, fake reviews, social media, World Wide Web, graph mining, feature engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
