A Closer Look at Weak Label Learning for Audio Events
Open accessAbstract
Audio content analysis in terms of sound events is an important research problem for a variety of applications. Recently, the development of weak labeling approaches for audio or sound event detection (AED) and availability of large scale weakly labeled dataset have finally opened up the possibility of large scale AED. However, a deeper understanding of how weak labels affect the learning for sound events is still missing from literature. In this work, we first describe a CNN based approach for weakly supervised training of audio events. The approach follows some basic design principle desirable in a learning method relying on weakly labeled audio. We then describe important characteristics, which naturally arise in weakly supervised learning of sound events. We show how these aspects of weak labels affect the generalization of models. More specifically, we study how characteristics such as label density and corruption of labels affects weakly supervised training for audio events. We also study the feasibility of directly obtaining weak labeled data from the web without any manual label and compare it with a dataset which has been manually labeled. The analysis and understanding of these factors should be taken into picture in the development of future weak label learning methods. Audioset, a large scale weakly labeled dataset for sound events is used in our experiments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing datasets for human vocal sounds have a relatively small number of vocal sound samples or noisy labels.
“However, existing datasets have a relatively small number of vocal sound samples or noisy labels.”
From Vocalsound: A Dataset for Improving Human Vocal Sounds Recognition (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
The FSD50K evaluation set has more accurate labels while AudioSet labels are relatively noisy.
“The reason why we use FSD50K rather than AudioSet as the base dataset is because FSD50K, especially its evaluation set, has more accurate labels [8] while labels of AudioSet are relatively noisy [6, 9, 10].”
From Vocalsound: A Dataset for Improving Human Vocal Sounds Recognition (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vocalsound: A Dataset for Improving Human Vocal Sounds Recognition
Gong, Y., Yu, J., & Glass, J. (2022) · ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp43922.2022.9746828 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“There are a few existing datasets for generic audio event classification that also contain human vocal sound samples such as AudioSet [4], FSD50K [8], ESC-50 [7], and DCASE [11].”
InfluentialFonseca, E., Hershey, S., Plakal, M., Ellis, D. P. W., Jansen, A., & Moore, R. C. (2020) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2020.3006378 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shah, A., Kumar, A., Hauptmann, A. G., & Raj, B.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1804.09288
- OpenAlex
- W6960144812
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- sound event detection, weakly supervised learning, audio classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review