Autofocus Layer for Semantic Segmentation
Open accessAbstract
We propose the autofocus convolutional layer for semantic segmentation with the objective of enhancing the capabilities of neural networks for multi-scale processing. Autofocus layers adaptively change the size of the effective receptive field based on the processed context to generate more powerful features. This is achieved by parallelising multiple convolutional layers with different dilation rates, combined by an attention mechanism that learns to focus on the optimal scales driven by context. By sharing the weights of the parallel convolutions we make the network scale-invariant, with only a modest increase in the number of parameters. The proposed autofocus layer can be easily integrated into existing networks to improve a model's representational power. We evaluate our models on the challenging tasks of multi-organ segmentation in pelvic CT and brain tumor segmentation in MRI and achieve very promising performance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are several strong initiatives across academia, and multiple large companies are pursuing healthcare projects based on machine learning.
“there are several strong initiatives across academia, and multiple large companies are pursuing healthcare projects based on machine learning.”
From An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI (2019) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404 · see citing works
Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation
Kamnitsas, K., Ledig, C., Newcombe, V. F. J., Simpson, J. P., Kane, A. D., Menon, D. K., Rueckert, D., & Glocker, B. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.10.004 · Cited by 3,498 · cited 10× · see citing works
“(d) Empowering the high-resolution pathway of DeepMedic with adaptive autofocus quickly outperforms the gains from the static second pathway on pelvic scan and brain tumor segmentation except for the enhancing tumor.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Toward Medical XAI
Tjoa, E., & Guan, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.3027314 · Cited by 2,524 · see citing works
An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI
Lundervold, A. S., & Lundervold, A. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik · doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.11.002 · Cited by 2,058 · see citing works
- Authors
- Qin, Y., Kamnitsas, K., Ancha, S., Nanavati, J., Cottrell, G., Criminisi, A., & Nori, A.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Qin, Yao
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 603-611
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1805.08403
- OpenAlex
- W2963284331
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- semantic segmentation, multi-scale processing, adaptive receptive field, dilation rate, attention mechanism, parameter sharing, scale invariance, multi-organ segmentation, pelvic CT, brain tumor segmentation, magnetic resonance imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
