PreprintCited by 49Gaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceMachine Learning and AlgorithmsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Semi-supervised Deep Kernel Learning: Regression with Unlabeled Data by Minimizing Predictive Variance

Open access

Abstract

Large amounts of labeled data are typically required to train deep learning models. For many real-world problems, however, acquiring additional data can be expensive or even impossible. We present semi-supervised deep kernel learning (SSDKL), a semi-supervised regression model based on minimizing predictive variance in the posterior regularization framework. SSDKL combines the hierarchical representation learning of neural networks with the probabilistic modeling capabilities of Gaussian processes. By leveraging unlabeled data, we show improvements on a diverse set of real-world regression tasks over supervised deep kernel learning and semi-supervised methods such as VAT and mean teacher adapted for regression.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1805.10407

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts

    Koh, P. W., Sagawa, S., Marklund, H., Xie, S. M., Zhang, M., Balsubramani, A., Hu, W., Yasunaga, M., Phillips, R. L., Gao, I., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07421 · Cited by 518

    “Poverty measures are known to be highly correlated across space, meaning nearby villages will likely have similar poverty measures, and methods can utilize this spatial structure (using the provided location coordinate metadata) to improve predictions (Jean et al., 2018; Rolf et al., 2020).”
    InfluentialSelf-citation

See all 49

Metadata

Authors
Jean, N., Xie, S. M., & Ermon, S.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
Volume
31
Pages
5322-5333
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804368052
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
semi-supervised regression, posterior regularization, Gaussian processes, unlabeled data, hierarchical feature learning, variational autoencoder, mean teacher

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review