PreprintCited by 387Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsModel Reduction and Neural NetworksAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and control

Open access
Sanchez-Gonzalez, Alvaro, Heess, Nicolas, Springenberg, Jost Tobias, Merel, Josh, Riedmiller, Martin, Hadsell, Raia, Battaglia, Peter·2018·arXiv

Abstract

Understanding and interacting with everyday physical scenes requires rich knowledge about the structure of the world, represented either implicitly in a value or policy function, or explicitly in a transition model. Here we introduce a new class of learnable models--based on graph networks--which implement an inductive bias for object- and relation-centric representations of complex, dynamical systems. Our results show that as a forward model, our approach supports accurate predictions from real and simulated data, and surprisingly strong and efficient generalization, across eight distinct physical systems which we varied parametrically and structurally. We also found that our inference model can perform system identification. Our models are also differentiable, and support online planning via gradient-based trajectory optimization, as well as offline policy optimization. Our framework offers new opportunities for harnessing and exploiting rich knowledge about the world, and takes a key step toward building machines with more human-like representations of the world.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1806.01242

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Heess, N., Springenberg, J. T., Merel, J., Riedmiller, M., Hadsell, R., & Battaglia, P.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
Pages
4467-4476
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804072623
Cited by
387
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 11
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Conference on Machine Learning
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
graph networks, inductive bias, forward model, system identification, trajectory optimization, differentiable physics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review