Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learning
Open accessAbstract
In this work, we build on recent advances in distributional reinforcement learning to give a generally applicable, flexible, and state-of-the-art distributional variant of DQN. We achieve this by using quantile regression to approximate the full quantile function for the state-action return distribution. By reparameterizing a distribution over the sample space, this yields an implicitly defined return distribution and gives rise to a large class of risk-sensitive policies. We demonstrate improved performance on the 57 Atari 2600 games in the ALE, and use our algorithm's implicitly defined distributions to study the effects of risk-sensitive policies in Atari games.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The RIQN framework has shown success by focusing on aleatoric uncertainty and draws upon generated distributions of Implicit Quantile networks.
“The RIQN (Danesh & Fern, 2021) framework has shown to be successful by focusing on the aleoric uncertainty of the agent and draws upon the generated distributions of Implicit Quartille networks (Dabney et al., 2018).”
From Novelty Detection in Reinforcement Learning with World Models (2023) · cites this paper as Dabney et al., 2018
Dreamer outperforms Rainbow and IQN on Atari.
“Dreamer also outperforms the widely-used expert algorithms Rainbow 40 and IQN 41 .”
From Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models (2023) · cites this paper as [41]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 45 · Cited by 331
- Authors
- Dabney, W., Ostrovski, G., Silver, D., & Munos, R.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 1096-1105
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1806.06923
- OpenAlex
- W2803308811
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- distributional reinforcement learning, quantile regression, deep Q-network, return distribution, Atari 2600
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
