PreprintCited by 57EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEmotion and Mood RecognitionGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Improving brain computer interface performance by data augmentation with conditional Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks

Open access
Zhang, Qiqi, Liu, Ying·2018·arXiv

Abstract

One of the big restrictions in brain computer interface field is the very limited training samples, it is difficult to build a reliable and usable system with such limited data. Inspired by generative adversarial networks, we propose a conditional Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial (cDCGAN) Networks method to generate more artificial EEG signal automatically for data augmentation to improve the performance of convolutional neural networks in brain computer interface field and overcome the small training dataset problems. We evaluate the proposed cDCGAN method on BCI competition dataset of motor imagery. The results show that the generated artificial EEG data from Gaussian noise can learn the features from raw EEG data and has no less than the classification accuracy of raw EEG data in the testing dataset. Also by using generated artificial data can effectively improve classification accuracy at the same model with limited training data.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1806.07108

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The improvement of classification performance requires at least a doubling size of generated data.

    “Research on the effect of different amounts of training data to the classification performance using artificial data has indicated that the improvement of performance requires at least a doubling size of GD (Zhang and Liu, 2018).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 57

Authors
Zhang, Q., & Liu, Y.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808991257
Cited by
57
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
brain-computer interface, data augmentation, conditional generative adversarial networks, motor imagery classification, limited training data, convolutional neural networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review