The DOI matches its DataCite record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generative Probabilistic Novelty Detection with Adversarial Autoencoders
Open accessAbstract
Novelty detection is the problem of identifying whether a new data point is considered to be an inlier or an outlier. We assume that training data is available to describe only the inlier distribution. Recent approaches primarily leverage deep encoder-decoder network architectures to compute a reconstruction error that is used to either compute a novelty score or to train a one-class classifier. While we too leverage a novel network of that kind, we take a probabilistic approach and effectively compute how likely is that a sample was generated by the inlier distribution. We achieve this with two main contributions. First, we make the computation of the novelty probability feasible because we linearize the parameterized manifold capturing the underlying structure of the inlier distribution, and show how the probability factorizes and can be computed with respect to local coordinates of the manifold tangent space. Second, we improved the training of the autoencoder network. An extensive set of results show that the approach achieves state-of-the-art results on several benchmark datasets.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, for practical applicability, PatchCore additionally introduces greedy coreset subsampling [1] for nominal feature banks as a key element to both reduce redundancy in the extracted, patch-level memory bank as well as significantly bringing down storage memory and inference time, making PatchCore very attractive for realistic industrial use cases.”
From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
Krizhevsky, A. (2024) · doi:10.57702/zp44cu3g · Cited by 23,889
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
(2017) · Cited by 11,625
Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms
Xiao, H., Rasul, K., & Vollgraf, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.07747 · Cited by 6,108
LOF: identifying density-based local outliers
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335388 · Cited by 5,207
What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?
Kendall, A., & Gal, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.04977 · Cited by 3,088
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection
Roth, K., Pemula, L., Zepeda, J., Scholkopf, B., Brox, T., & Gehler, P. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01392 · Cited by 1,810
“Other unsupervised representation learning methods can similarly be utilised, such as via GANs [13], learning to predict predefined geometric transformations [20] or via normalizing flows [42].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPaDiM: A Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localization
Defard, T., Setkov, A., Loesch, A., & Audigier, R. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68799-1_35 · Cited by 1,415
A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detection
Ruff, L., Kauffmann, J., Vandermeulen, R. A., Montavon, G., Samek, W., Kloft, M., Dietterich, T. G., & Muller, K.-R. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3052449 · Cited by 1,184
Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Survey
Yang, J., Zhou, K., Li, Y., & Liu, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-024-02117-4 · Cited by 884
OCGAN: One-Class Novelty Detection Using GANs With Constrained Latent Representations
Perera, P., Nallapati, R., & Xiang, B. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00301 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Pidhorskyi, S., Almohsen, R., Adjeroh, D. A., & Doretto, G.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 31
- Pages
- 6823-6834
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1807.02588
- OpenAlex
- W2860343088
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Keywords
- novelty detection, outlier detection, probabilistic generative models, adversarial autoencoder, tangent space, reconstruction error, one-class classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
