CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 104Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Tiny-DSOD: Lightweight Object Detection for Resource-Restricted Usages

Open access
Li, Yuxi, Li, Jiuwei, Lin, Weiyao, Li, Jianguo·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1807.11013arXiv 1807.11013
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Object detection has made great progress in the past few years along with the development of deep learning. However, most current object detection methods are resource hungry, which hinders their wide deployment to many resource restricted usages such as usages on always-on devices, battery-powered low-end devices, etc. This paper considers the resource and accuracy trade-off for resource-restricted usages during designing the whole object detection framework. Based on the deeply supervised object detection (DSOD) framework, we propose Tiny-DSOD dedicating to resource-restricted usages. Tiny-DSOD introduces two innovative and ultra-efficient architecture blocks: depthwise dense block (DDB) based backbone and depthwise feature-pyramid-network (D-FPN) based front-end. We conduct extensive experiments on three famous benchmarks (PASCAL VOC 2007, KITTI, and COCO), and compare Tiny-DSOD to the state-of-the-art ultra-efficient object detection solutions such as Tiny-YOLO, MobileNet-SSD (v1 & v2), SqueezeDet, Pelee, etc. Results show that Tiny-DSOD outperforms these solutions in all the three metrics (parameter-size, FLOPs, accuracy) in each comparison. For instance, Tiny-DSOD achieves 72.1% mAP with only 0.95M parameters and 1.06B FLOPs, which is by far the state-of-the-arts result with such a low resource requirement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1807.11013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The depth-wise separable convolution idea has been recently applied to object detection and fine-grain classification.

    “This idea has been recently applied to object detection and fine-grain classification [143-145].”

    From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [145]

    The Introduction (p. 2) describes using depthwise separable convolutions in Tiny-DSOD, an object detector. “Lightweight Object Detection Networks” (p. 3) also reports their use in MobileNet-SSD and in generic image classification, but the copy does not establish an application to fine-grained classification. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 27 · Cited by 104

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. [1][1] Khalid Ashraf, Bichen Wu, et al. Shallow networks for high-accuracy road objectdetection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01561 , 2016. - · arXiv
  2. [2][2] Zhaowei Cai, Quanfu Fan, Rogerio S. Feris, and Nuno Vasconcelos. A unified multiscale deep convolutional neural network for fast object detection. In ECCV , 2016. -
  3. [3][3] Francois Chollet. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. In CVPR , 2016. -
  4. [4][4] Jifeng Dai, Yi Li, Kaiming He, and Jian Sun. R-fcn: Object detection via region-based fully convolutional networks. In NIPS , 2016. -
  5. [5][5] Mark Everingham, Luc Van Gool, Christopher Williams, John Winn, and Andrew Zisserman. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. IJCV , 88(2):303-338, 2010. -
  6. [6][6] Cheng Yang Fu, Wei Liu, Ananth Ranga, Ambrish Tyagi, and Alex Berg. Dssd : Deconvolutional single shot detector. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06659 , 2017. - · arXiv
  7. [7][7] Andreas Geiger, Philip Lenz, and Raquel Urtasun. Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite. In CVPR , 2012. -
  8. [8][8] Ross Girshick. Fast r-cnn. In ICCV , 2015. -
  9. [9][9] Ross Girshick, Jeff Donahue, Trevor Darrell, and Jitendra Malik. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In CVPR , 2014. -
  10. [10][10] Xavier Glorot and Yoshua Bengio. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. JMLR , 9:249-256, 2010. -
  11. [11][11] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. CVPR , 2016. -
  12. [12][12] Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollár, et al. Mask r-cnn. In ICCV , 2017. -
  13. [13][13] Andrew Howard, Menglong Zhu, et al. Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861 , 2017. - · arXiv
  14. [14][14] Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens Van De Maaten, and Kilian Q. Weinberger. Densely connected convolutional networks. In CVPR , 2017. -
  15. [15][15] Gao Huang, Shichen Liu, Van Der Maaten Laurens, and Kilian Q Weinberger. Condensenet: An efficient densenet using learned group convolutions. In CVPR , 2018. -
  16. [16][16] Jonathan Huang, Vivek Rathod, Chen Sun, et al. Speed/accuracy trade-offs for modern convolutional object detectors. In CVPR , 2017. -
  17. [17][17] Forrest N Iandola, Song Han, et al. Squeezenet: Alexnet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5 mb model size. In ICLR , 2016. -
  18. [18][18] Yangqing Jia, Evan Shelhamer, Jeff Donahue, et al. Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5093 , 2014. - · arXiv
  19. [19][19] Tsung Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, et al. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In ECCV , 2014. -
  20. [21][21] Wei Liu, Andrew Rabinovich, and Alexander C Berg. Parsenet: Looking wider to see better. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04579 , 2015. - · arXiv
  21. [22][22] Wei Liu, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, et al. Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. In ECCV , pages 21-37, 2016. -
  22. [23][23] Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. Yolo9000: Better, faster, stronger. In CVPR , 2016. -
  23. [24][24] Joseph Redmon, Santosh Divvala, Ross Girshick, and Ali Farhadi. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In CVPR , pages 779-788, 2016. -
  24. [25][25] Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster r-cnn: towards realtime object detection with region proposal networks. In NIPS , pages 91-99, 2015. -
  25. [26][26] Xiang Li Robert Wang, Shuang Ao and Charles X. Ling. Pelee: A real-time object detection system on mobile devices. In ICLR Workshop , 2018. -
  26. [27][27] Mark Sandler, Andrew Howard, Menglong Zhu, et al. Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks: Mobile networks for classification, detection and segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.04381 , 2018. - · arXiv
  27. [28][28] Zhiqiang Shen, Zhuang Liu, Jianguo Li, et al. Dsod: Learning deeply supervised object detectors from scratch. In ICCV , pages 1937-1945, 2017. -
  28. [29][29] Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for largescale image recognition. In ICLR , 2014. -
  29. [30][30] Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, et al. Going deeper with convolutions. In CVPR , 2015. -
  30. [31][31] Jasper RR Uijlings, Koen EA Van De Sande, Theo Gevers, and Arnold WM Smeulders. Selective search for object recognition. IJCV , 2013. -
  31. [32][32] Bichen Wu, Forrest Iandola, et al. Squeezedet: Unified, small, low power fully convolutional neural networks for real-time object detection for autonomous driving. In CVPR Workshops , 2017. -
  32. [33][33] Wei Xiang, Dong Qing Zhang, Vassilis Athitsos, and Heather Yu. Context-aware single-shot detector. In WACV , 2018. -
  33. [34][34] Xiang, Yu and Choi, Wongun and Lin, Yuanqing and Savarese, Silvio. SubcategoryAware Convolutional Neural Networks for Object Proposals and Detection arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.04693 , 2016. · arXiv

Authors
Li, Y., Li, J., Lin, W., & Li, J.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
Pages
59
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1807.11013
arXiv
1807.11013
OpenAlex
W2883208628
Cited by
104
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
lightweight object detection, efficient neural network architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review