CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 678Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesDigital Media Forensic Detection

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 74 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Video-to-Video Synthesis

Open access
Wang, Ting-Chun, Liu, Ming-Yu, Zhu, Jun-Yan, Liu, Guilin, Tao, Andrew, Kautz, Jan, Catanzaro, Bryan·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1808.06601arXiv 1808.06601
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We study the problem of video-to-video synthesis, whose goal is to learn a mapping function from an input source video (e.g., a sequence of semantic segmentation masks) to an output photorealistic video that precisely depicts the content of the source video. While its image counterpart, the image-to-image synthesis problem, is a popular topic, the video-to-video synthesis problem is less explored in the literature. Without understanding temporal dynamics, directly applying existing image synthesis approaches to an input video often results in temporally incoherent videos of low visual quality. In this paper, we propose a novel video-to-video synthesis approach under the generative adversarial learning framework. Through carefully-designed generator and discriminator architectures, coupled with a spatio-temporal adversarial objective, we achieve high-resolution, photorealistic, temporally coherent video results on a diverse set of input formats including segmentation masks, sketches, and poses. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show the advantage of our method compared to strong baselines. In particular, our model is capable of synthesizing 2K resolution videos of street scenes up to 30 seconds long, which significantly advances the state-of-the-art of video synthesis. Finally, we apply our approach to future video prediction, outperforming several state-of-the-art competing systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1808.06601

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [7][7] Z. Cao, T. Simon, S.-E. Wei, and Y. Sheikh. Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2017. -
  2. [16][16] A. Dosovitskiy and T. Brox. Generating images with perceptual similarity metrics based on deep networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) , 2016. -
  3. [25][25] K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Dollár, and R. Girshick. Mask R-CNN. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , 2017. -
  4. [32][32] E. Ilg, N. Mayer, T. Saikia, M. Keuper, A. Dosovitskiy, and T. Brox. Flownet 2.0: Evolution of optical flow estimation with deep networks. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2017. -
  5. [36][36] N. Kalchbrenner, A. v. d. Oord, K. Simonyan, I. Danihelka, O. Vinyals, A. Graves, and K. Kavukcuoglu. Video pixel networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.00527 , 2016. - · arXiv
  6. [37][37] T. Karras, T. Aila, S. Laine, and J. Lehtinen. Progressive growing of GANs for improved quality, stability, and variation. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2018. -
  7. [42][42] X. Liang, L. Lee, W. Dai, and E. P. Xing. Dual motion GAN for future-flow embedded video prediction. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) , 2017. -
  8. [47][47] L. Ma, X. Jia, Q. Sun, B. Schiele, T. Tuytelaars, and L. Van Gool. Pose guided person image generation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) , 2017. -
  9. [50][50] M. Mathieu, C. Couprie, and Y. LeCun. Deep multi-scale video prediction beyond mean square error. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2016. -
  10. [65][65] N. Srivastava, E. Mansimov, and R. Salakhudinov. Unsupervised learning of video representations using lstms. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , 2015. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–678 of 678

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wang, T.-C., Liu, M.-Y., Zhu, J.-Y., Liu, G., Tao, A., Kautz, J., & Catanzaro, B.
Affiliations
  • Nvidia (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Adobe Systems (United States) (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
Volume
31
Pages
1144-1156
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1808.06601
arXiv
1808.06601
OpenAlex
W2886748926
Cited by
594
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • TIB Data Manager
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
semantic segmentation masks, generative adversarial networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review