YouTube-VOS: A Large-Scale Video Object Segmentation Benchmark
Open accessAbstract
Learning long-term spatial-temporal features are critical for many video analysis tasks. However, existing video segmentation methods predominantly rely on static image segmentation techniques, and methods capturing temporal dependency for segmentation have to depend on pretrained optical flow models, leading to suboptimal solutions for the problem. End-to-end sequential learning to explore spatialtemporal features for video segmentation is largely limited by the scale of available video segmentation datasets, i.e., even the largest video segmentation dataset only contains 90 short video clips. To solve this problem, we build a new large-scale video object segmentation dataset called YouTube Video Object Segmentation dataset (YouTube-VOS). Our dataset contains 4,453 YouTube video clips and 94 object categories. This is by far the largest video object segmentation dataset to our knowledge and has been released at http://youtube-vos.org. We further evaluate several existing state-of-the-art video object segmentation algorithms on this dataset which aims to establish baselines for the development of new algorithms in the future.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SAM2Long performs comparably to SAM 2 on shorter-duration datasets.
“Although SAM2Long performs comparably to SAM 2 on shorter-duration datasets [47,63], this aligns with the limited long-term tracking opportunities provided by short video sequences.”
From SAM2LONG: Enhancing SAM 2 for Long Video Segmentation with a Training-Free Memory Tree (2025) · cites this paper as [63]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Learning Spatiotemporal Features with 3D Convolutional Networks
Tran, D., Bourdev, L., Fergus, R., Torresani, L., & Paluri, M. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.510 · Cited by 9,593 · see citing works
ActivityNet: A large-scale video benchmark for human activity understanding
Heilbron, F. C., Escorcia, V., Ghanem, B., & Niebles, J. C. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298698 · Cited by 2,578 · see citing works
Online Adaptation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Video Object Segmentation
Voigtlaender, P., & Leibe, B. (2017) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2017 · doi:10.5244/c.31.116 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- [1]1. Donahue, J., Anne Hendricks, L., Guadarrama, S., Rohrbach, M., Venugopalan, S., Saenko, K., Darrell, T.: Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual recognition and description. In: CVPR. (2015)
- [2]2. Srivastava, N., Mansimov, E., Salakhudinov, R.: Unsupervised learning of video representations using lstms. In: International conference on machine learning. (2015)
- [4]4. Xingjian, S., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.Y., Wong, W.K., Woo, W.c.: Convolutional lstm network: A machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting. In: Advances in neural information processing systems. (2015) 802-810
- [5]5. Finn, C., Goodfellow, I., Levine, S.: Unsupervised learning for physical interaction through video prediction. In: Advances in neural information processing systems. (2016)
- [6]6. Xu, H., Gao, Y., Yu, F., Darrell, T.: End-to-end learning of driving models from large-scale video datasets. In: CVPR. (2017)
- [7]7. Caelles, S., Maninis, K.K., Pont-Tuset, J., Leal-Taix´ e, L., Cremers, D., Van Gool, L.: One-shot video object segmentation. In: CVPR. (2017)
- [8]8. Perazzi, F., Khoreva, A., Benenson, R., Schiele, B., A.Sorkine-Hornung: Learning video object segmentation from static images. In: CVPR. (2017)
- [9]9. Yang, L., Xiong, X., Wang, Y., Yang, J., Katsaggelos, A.K.: Efficient video object segmentation via network modulation. In: CVPR. (2018)
- [10]10. Cheng, J., Tsai, Y.H., Wang, S., Yang, M.H.: Segflow: Joint learning for video object segmentation and optical flow. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). (2017)
- [11]11. Dutt Jain, S., Xiong, B., Grauman, K.: Fusionseg: Learning to combine motion and appearance for fully automatic segmentation of generic objects in videos. In: The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). (July 2017)
- [12]12. Jampani, V., Gadde, R., Gehler, P.V.: Video propagation networks. In: CVPR. (2017)
- [13]13. Tokmakov, P., Alahari, K., Schmid, C.: Learning video object segmentation with visual memory. In: ICCV. (2017)
- [14]14. Hu, Y.T., Huang, J.B., Schwing, A.: Maskrnn: Instance level video object segmentation. In: NIPS. (2017)
- [15]15. Perazzi, F., Pont-Tuset, J., McWilliams, B., Van Gool, L., Gross, M., SorkineHornung, A.: A benchmark dataset and evaluation methodology for video object segmentation. In: CVPR. (2016)
- [16]16. Jain, S.D., Grauman, K.: Supervoxel-consistent foreground propagation in video. In: ECCV. (2014)
- [17]17. Ilg, E., Mayer, N., Saikia, T., Keuper, M., Dosovitskiy, A., Brox, T.: Flownet 2.0: Evolution of optical flow estimation with deep networks. CVPR (2017)
- [18]18. Revaud, J., Weinzaepfel, P., Harchaoui, Z., Schmid, C.: Epicflow: Edge-preserving interpolation of correspondences for optical flow. In: CVPR. (2015)
- [19]19. Tokmakov, P., Alahari, K., Schmid, C.: Learning motion patterns in videos. In: CVPR. (2017)
- [20]20. Pont-Tuset, J., Perazzi, F., Caelles, S., Arbel´ aez, P., Sorkine-Hornung, A., Van Gool, L.: The 2017 davis challenge on video object segmentation. arXiv:1704.00675 (2017) · arXiv
- [21]21. Fan, Q., Zhong, F., Lischinski, D., Cohen-Or, D., Chen, B.: Jumpcut:non-successive mask transfer and interpolation for video cutout. In: ACM Trans. Graph., 34(6). (2015)
- [22]22. Li, F., Kim, T., Humayun, A., Tsai, D., Rehg, J.M.: Video segmentation by tracking many figure-ground segments. In: ICCV. (2013)
- [23]23. Brox, T., Malik, J.: Object segmentation by long term analysis of point trajectories. In: ECCV. (2010) 282-295
- [24]24. Ochs, P., Malik, J., Brox, T.: Segmentation of moving objects by long term video analysis. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 36 (6) (2014) 1187-1200
- [25]25. Galasso, F., Nagaraja, N.S., C´ ardenas, T.J., Brox, T., Schiele, B.: A unified video segmentation benchmark: Annotation, metrics and analysis. In: ICCV, IEEE (2013)
- [26]26. Abu-El-Haija, S., Kothari, N., Lee, J., Natsev, P., Toderici, G., Varadarajan, B., Vijayanarasimhan, S.: Youtube-8m: A large-scale video classification benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08675 (2016) · arXiv
- [28]28. Nagaraja, N.S., Schmidt, F.R., Brox, T.: Video segmentation with just a few strokes. In: ICCV. (2015) 3235-3243
- [29]29. Faktor, A., Irani, M.: Video segmentation by non-local consensus voting. In: BMVC. (2014)
- [30]30. Papazoglou, A., Ferrari, V.: Fast object segmentation in unconstrained video. In: Computer Vision (ICCV), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE (2013) 1777-1784
- [31]31. Brox, T., Malik, J.: Object segmentation by long term analysis of point trajectories. In: European conference on computer vision, Springer (2010) 282-295
- [32]32. Shelhamer, E., Long, J., Darrell, T.: Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 39 (4) (2017) 640-651
- [33]33. Chen, L., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., Yuille, A.L.: Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs. In: IEEE T-PAMI. Volume 40. (2018) 834-848
- [34]34. Xu, N., Yang, L., Yue, D., Yang, J., Price, B., Yang, J., Cohen, S., Fan, Y., Liang, Y., Huang, T.: Youtube-vos: Sequence-to-sequence video object segmentation. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). (2018) 585-601
Cited by
Sorted by citations
BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learning
Yu, F., Chen, H., Wang, X., Xian, W., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Madhavan, V., & Darrell, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00271 · Cited by 2,641 · see citing works
D3S – A Discriminative Single Shot Segmentation Tracker
Lukezic, A., Matas, J., & Kristan, M. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00716 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Learning What to Learn for Video Object Segmentation
Bhat, G., Lawin, F. J., Danelljan, M., Robinson, A., Felsberg, M., Van Gool, L., & Timofte, R. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58536-5_46 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Learning Multi-Object Tracking and Segmentation From Automatic Annotations
Porzi, L., Hofinger, M., Ruiz, I., Serrat, J., Bulo, S. R., & Kontschieder, P. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00688 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Towards Accurate Pixel-wise Object Tracking by Attention Retrieval
Zhang, Z., Li, B., Hu, W., & Peng, H. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.02745 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
SAM2LONG: Enhancing SAM 2 for Long Video Segmentation with a Training-Free Memory Tree
Ding, S., Qian, R., Dong, X., Zhang, P., Zang, Y., Cao, Y., Guo, Y., Lin, D., & Wang, J. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.01264 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Chen, N., Xu, T., Sun, M., Yao, C., & Yang, D. (2025) · Intelligent Computing · doi:10.34133/icomputing.0143 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xu, N., Yang, L., Fan, Y., Yue, D., Liang, Y., Yang, J., & Huang, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1809.03327
- OpenAlex
- W2890447039
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Keywords
- video object segmentation, benchmark dataset, large-scale video datasets, spatio-temporal features, temporal dependencies, end-to-end learning, object categories
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review