A Fog Robotic System for Dynamic Visual Servoing
Open accessAbstract
Cloud Robotics is a paradigm where distributed robots are connected to cloud services via networks to access unlimited computation power, at the cost of network communication. However, due to limitations such as network latency and variability, it is difficult to control dynamic, human compliant service robots directly from the cloud. In this work, by leveraging asynchronous protocol with a heartbeat signal, we combine cloud robotics with a smart edge device to build a Fog Robotic system. We use the system to enable robust teleoperation of a dynamic self-balancing robot from the cloud. We first use the system to pick up boxes from static locations, a task commonly performed in warehouse logistics. To make cloud teleoperation more efficient, we deploy image based visual servoing (IBVS) to perform box pickups automatically. Visual feedbacks, including apriltag recognition and tracking, are performed in the cloud to emulate a Fog Robotic object recognition system for IBVS. We demonstrate the feasibility of real-time dynamic automation system using this cloud-edge hybrid, which opens up possibilities of deploying dynamic robotic control with deep-learning recognition systems in Fog Robotics. Finally, we show that Fog Robotics enables the self-balancing service robot to pick up a box automatically from a person under unstructured environments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combination of DL and edge computing endows robots the ability of dynamic visual servicing and enables efficient music cognition system.
“For instance, it endows robots the ability of dynamic visual servicing [120] and enables efficient music cognition system [121].”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [120]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2970550 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tian, N., Chen, J., Ma, M., Zhang, R., Huang, B., Goldberg, K., & Sojoudi, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 1982-1988
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1809.06716
- OpenAlex
- W2968539525
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Office of Naval Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- cloud robotics, image-based visual servoing, teleoperation, self-balancing robot, edge computing, asynchronous communication protocol, heartbeat signal, warehouse logistics, human-robot interaction, network latency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review