Co-Creative Level Design via Machine Learning
Open accessAbstract
Procedural Level Generation via Machine Learning (PLGML), the study of generating game levels with machine learning, has received a large amount of recent academic attention. For certain measures these approaches have shown success at replicating the quality of existing game levels. However, it is unclear the extent to which they might benefit human designers. In this paper we present a framework for co-creative level design with a PLGML agent. In support of this framework we present results from a user study and results from a comparative study of PLGML approaches.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior HCI literature has investigated design methodologies or strategies facilitating HAI interaction and dynamics in co-creative practices.
“Previous HCI literature has also investigated in design methodologies or strategies facilitating HAI interaction and dynamics in co-creative practices [32,33].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Abadi, M.; Barham, P.; Chen, J.; Chen, Z.; Davis, A.; Dean, J.; Devin, M.; Ghemawat, S.; Irving, G.; Isard, M.; et al. 2016. Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In OSDI , volume 16, 265-283.
- Baldwin, A.; Dahlskog, S.; Font, J. M.; and Holmberg, J. 2017. Mixed-initiative procedural generation of dungeons using game design patterns. In Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), 2017 IEEE Conference on , 25-32. IEEE.
- Deterding, C. S.; Hook, J. D.; Fiebrink, R.; Gow, J.; Akten, M.; Smith, G.; Liapis, A.; and Compton, K. 2017. Mixedinitiative creative interfaces. In CHI EA'17: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems . ACM.
- Guzdial, M., and Riedl, M. 2016. Game level generation from gameplay videos. In Twelfth Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference .
- Guzdial, M.; Chen, J.; Chen, S.-Y.; and Riedl, M. O. 2017. A general level design editor for co-creative level design. Fourth Experimental AI in Games Workshop .
- Liapis, A.; Yannakakis, G. N.; and Togelius, J. 2013. Sentient sketchbook: Computer-aided game level authoring. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Foundations of Digital Games , 213-220. FDG.
- Mnih, V.; Kavukcuoglu, K.; Silver, D.; Graves, A.; Antonoglou, I.; Wierstra, D.; and Riedmiller, M. 2013. Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5602 . · arXiv
- Rohanimanesh, K., and Mahadevan, S. 2003. Learning to take concurrent actions. In Advances in neural information processing systems , 1651-1658.
- Shaker, N.; Shaker, M.; and Togelius, J. 2013. Ropossum: An authoring tool for designing, optimizing and solving cut the rope levels. In Proceedings of the Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment .
- Smith, G.; Whitehead, J.; and Mateas, M. 2010. Tanagra: A mixed-initiative level design tool. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games , 209-216. ACM.
- Snodgrass, S., and Ontan´ on, S. 2017. Learning to generate video game maps using markov models. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 9(4):410422.
- Summerville, A., and Mateas, M. 2016. Super mario as a string: Platformer level generation via lstms. In The 1st International Conference of DiGRA and FDG .
- Summerville, A.; Snodgrass, S.; Guzdial, M.; Holmg˚ ard, C.; Hoover, A. K.; Isaksen, A.; Nealen, A.; and Togelius, J. 2017. Procedural content generation via machine learning (pcgml). arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.00539 . · arXiv
- Summerville, A. 2018. Learning from Games for Generative Purposes . Ph.D. Dissertation, UC Santa Cruz.
- Yannakakis, G. N.; Liapis, A.; and Alexopoulos, C. 2014. Mixed-initiative co-creativity. In Proceedings of the 9th Con- ference on the Foundations of Digital Games . FDG.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Plug-and-Blend: A Framework for Plug-and-Play Controllable Story Generation with Sketches
Lin, Z., & Riedl, M. O. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment · doi:10.1609/aiide.v17i1.18891 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationHe, Q., Zheng, W., Bao, H., Chen, R., & Tong, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium of Chinese CHI · doi:10.1145/3629606.3629675 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guzdial, M., Liao, N., & Riedl, M.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1809.09420
- OpenAlex
- W2893089956
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1525967)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Keywords
- procedural level generation, level design, machine learning agents, human-AI collaboration, user study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
