The DOI matches its DataCite record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering
Open accessAbstract
Existing question answering (QA) datasets fail to train QA systems to perform complex reasoning and provide explanations for answers. We introduce HotpotQA, a new dataset with 113k Wikipedia-based question-answer pairs with four key features: (1) the questions require finding and reasoning over multiple supporting documents to answer; (2) the questions are diverse and not constrained to any pre-existing knowledge bases or knowledge schemas; (3) we provide sentence-level supporting facts required for reasoning, allowing QA systems to reason with strong supervision and explain the predictions; (4) we offer a new type of factoid comparison questions to test QA systems' ability to extract relevant facts and perform necessary comparison. We show that HotpotQA is challenging for the latest QA systems, and the supporting facts enable models to improve performance and make explainable predictions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We modify the DSPy framework [24] for joint optimization, lowering cost while maintaining accuracy on HotPotQA [60].”
From AI Agents That Matter (2024) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“Multi-step reasoning in LLMs typically involves executing sequential logical operations-typically requiring 3-10 intermediate steps-to arrive at solutions that cannot be derived through single-step inference (Cobbe et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2018; Suzgun et al., 2022).”
From Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“For example, Reflexion (Shinn et al., 2023) tracks success rate on tasks like HotPotQA (Yang et al., 2018) and ALFWorld (Shridhar et al., 2021), while RAISE (Liu et al., 2024a) enhances the ReAct framework with a two-part memory system evaluated through human judgment on quality metrics and efficiency.”
From Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit
Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J. R., Bethard, S. J., & McClosky, D. (2014) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (ACL Demo) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-5010 · Cited by 7,252
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Dataset
Bajaj, P., Campos, D., Craswell, N., Deng, L., Gao, J., Liu, X., Majumder, R., McNamara, A., Mitra, B., Nguyen, T., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.09268 · Cited by 2,473
Know What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240
TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension
Joshi, M., Choi, E., Weld, D., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1147 · Cited by 1,690
SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05250 · Cited by 678
Gated Self-Matching Networks for Reading Comprehension and Question Answering
Wang, W., Yang, N., Wei, F., Chang, B., & Zhou, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1018 · Cited by 674
The Web as a Knowledge-Base for Answering Complex Questions
Talmor, A., & Berant, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1059 · Cited by 520
Simple and Effective Multi-Paragraph Reading Comprehension
Clark, C., & Gardner, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1078 · Cited by 434
Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLG
Novikova, J., Dušek, O., Cercas Curry, A., & Rieser, V. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1238 · Cited by 422
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–123 of 123
Can Edge Probing Tasks Reveal Linguistic Knowledge in QA Models?Preprint
Choudhury, S. R., Bhutani, N., & Augenstein, I. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.07102 · Cited by 1
Representation Decoupling for Open-Domain Passage Retrieval.Preprint
Wu, B., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., & Zhao, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
Recent Advances in Automated Question Answering In Biomedical DomainPreprint
Baksi, K. D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.05937 · Cited by 1
RCR-Router: Efficient Role-Aware Context Routing for Multi-Agent LLM Systems with Structured Memory
Liu, J., Kong, Z., Yang, C., Yang, F., Li, T., Dong, P., Nanjekye, J., Tang, H., Yuan, G., Niu, W., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.04903
BrowseComp-ZH: Benchmarking Web Browsing Ability of Large Language Models in Chinese
Zhou, P., Leon, B., Ying, X., Zhang, C., Shao, Y., Ye, Q., Chong, D., Jin, Z., Xie, C., Cao, M., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.19314
Cao, S., Zou, K., & Wang, L. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1707
DeepScholar-Bench: A Live Benchmark and Automated Evaluation for Generative Research Synthesis
Patel, L., Arabzadeh, N., Gupta, H., Sundar, A., Stoica, I., Zaharia, M., & Guestrin, C. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.20033
Better Understanding Hierarchical Visual Relationship for Image CaptionPreprint
Fei, Z. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01881 · Cited by 1
KPQA: A Metric for Generative Question Answering Using Word Weights.Preprint
Lee, H., Yoon, S., Dernoncourt, F., Kim, D. S., Bui, T., Shin, J., & Jung, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Fine-tuning Multi-hop Question Answering with Hierarchical Graph NetworkPreprint
Xiong, G. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.13821
Liu, C.-L., & Lee, H.-Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University)
CHIME: Cross-passage Hierarchical Memory Network for Generative Review Question AnsweringPreprint
Lu, J., Pergola, G., Gui, L., Li, B., & He, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.00519
A Multilingual Modeling Method for Span-Extraction Reading ComprehensionPreprint
Wu, G., Xu, B., Chang, D., & Liu, B. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.14880
When to Fold'em: How to answer Unanswerable questionsPreprint
Ho, M., Zhou, Z., & He, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.00328
Improve Query Focused Abstractive Summarization by Incorporating Answer RelevancePreprint
Su, D., Yu, T., & Fung, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.12969
Parameter-Efficient Neural Question Answering Models via Graph-Enriched Document RepresentationsPreprint
Castricato, L., Fitz, S., & Shin, W. Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.00851
MeDiaQA: A Question Answering Dataset on Medical DialoguesPreprint
Suri, H., Zhang, Q., Huo, W., Liu, Y., & Guan, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.08074 · Cited by 11
EpiK-Eval: Evaluation for Language Models as Epistemic Models
Prato, G., Huang, J., Parthasarathi, P., Sodhani, S., & Chandar, S. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.593 · Cited by 3
Compare: A Framework for Scientific Comparisons
Staudinger, M., Kusa, W., Cancellieri, M., Pride, D., Knoth, P., & Hanbury, A. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3746252.3761493
RAG-DIVE: A Dynamic Approach for Multi-Turn Dialogue Evaluation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Brehme, L., Dornauer, B., Böttcher, J.-H., Schmid, K., Racasan, M.-C., & Breu, R. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN) · doi:10.1145/3793653.3793766
Dammu, P. P. S., Palkhiwala, A., Roosta, T. G., & Shah, C. (2026) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3805712.3808627 · Cited by 1
Phan, L. (2025) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6615297/v1 · Cited by 65
Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequences
Zaheer, M., Guruganesh, G., Dubey, A., Ainslie, J., Alberti, C., Ontanon, S., Pham, P., Ravula, A., Wang, Q., Yang, L., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.14062 · Cited by 1,349
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Z., Qi, P., Zhang, S., Bengio, Y., Cohen, W. W., Salakhutdinov, R., & Manning, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1809.09600
- OpenAlex
- W2952862139
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1514268)
- Nvidia
- Université de Montréal
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Office of Naval Research (N000141812861)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Keywords
- multi-hop question answering, HotpotQA, explainable question answering, complex reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
