The DOI matches its DataCite record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalization and Regularization in DQN
Open accessAbstract
Deep reinforcement learning algorithms have shown an impressive ability to learn complex control policies in high-dimensional tasks. However, despite the ever-increasing performance on popular benchmarks, policies learned by deep reinforcement learning algorithms can struggle to generalize when evaluated in remarkably similar environments. In this paper we propose a protocol to evaluate generalization in reinforcement learning through different modes of Atari 2600 games. With that protocol we assess the generalization capabilities of DQN, one of the most traditional deep reinforcement learning algorithms, and we provide evidence suggesting that DQN overspecializes to the training environment. We then comprehensively evaluate the impact of dropout and $\ell_2$ regularization, as well as the impact of reusing learned representations to improve the generalization capabilities of DQN. Despite regularization being largely underutilized in deep reinforcement learning, we show that it can, in fact, help DQN learn more general features. These features can be reused and fine-tuned on similar tasks, considerably improving DQN's sample efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“even minor changes to the environment can cause substantial degradation in agent performance”
From A Study of Global and Episodic Bonuses for Exploration in Contextual MDPs (2023) · cites this paper as Farebrother et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks
Kirkpatrick, J., Pascanu, R., Rabinowitz, N., Veness, J., Desjardins, G., Rusu, A. A., Milan, K., Quan, J., Ramalho, T., Grabska-Barwinska, A., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1611835114 · Cited by 7,899
How transferable are features in deep neural networks?
Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y., & Lipson, H. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1792 · Cited by 6,061
Deep Reinforcement Learning That Matters
Henderson, P., Islam, R., Bachman, P., Pineau, J., Precup, D., & Meger, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11694 · Cited by 1,685
Machado, M. C., Bellemare, M. G., Talvitie, E., Veness, J., Hausknecht, M., & Bowling, M. (2018) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.5699 · Cited by 359
Self-citationProtecting against evaluation overfitting in empirical reinforcement learning
Whiteson, S., Tanner, B., Taylor, M. E., & Stone, P. (2011) · 2011 IEEE Symposium on Adaptive Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning (ADPRL) · doi:10.1109/adprl.2011.5967363 · Cited by 86
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Marcin Andrychowicz, Dwight Crow, Alex Ray, Jonas Schneider, Rachel Fong, Peter Welinder, Bob McGrew, Josh Tobin, Pieter Abbeel, and Wojciech Zaremba. 2017. Hindsight Experience Replay. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) . 5048-5058.
- Marc G. Bellemare, Yavar Naddaf, Joel Veness, and Michael Bowling. 2013. The Arcade Learning Environment: An Evaluation Platform for General Agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 47 (2013), 253-279.
- Karl Cobbe, Oleg Klimov, Christopher Hesse, Taehoon Kim, and John Schulman. 2019. Quantifying Generalization in Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) . 1282-1289.
- Laurent Dinh, Razvan Pascanu, Samy Bengio, and Yoshua Bengio. 2017. Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Nets. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) . 1019-1028.
- Lasse Espeholt, Hubert Soyer, R´ emi Munos, Karen Simonyan, Volodymyr Mnih, Tom Ward, Yotam Doron, Vlad Firoiu, Tim Harley, Iain Dunning, Shane Legg, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. 2018. IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architectures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) . 1406-1415.
- Amir Massoud Farahmand, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Csaba Szepesv´ ari, and Shie Mannor. 2008. Regularized Policy Iteration. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) . 441-448.
- Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. 2017. Model-Agnostic MetaLearning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) . 1126-1135.
- Xavier Glorot and Yoshua Bengio. 2010. Understanding the Difficulty of Training Deep Feedforward Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) . 249-256.
- Jeremy Howard and Sebastian Ruder. 2018. Fine-tuned Language Models for Text Classification. CoRR abs/1801.06146 (2018). · arXiv
- Arthur Juliani, Ahmed Khalifa, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Jonathan Harper, Ervin Teng, Hunter Henry, Adam Crespi, Julian Togelius, and Danny Lange. 2019. Obstacle Tower: A Generalization Challenge in Vision, Control, and Planning. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) . 2684-2691.
- Niels Justesen, Ruben Rodriguez Torrado, Philip Bontrager, Ahmed Khalifa, Julian Togelius, and Sebastian Risi. 2018. Procedural Level Generation Improves Generality of Deep Reinforcement Learning. CoRR abs/1806.10729 (2018). · arXiv
- J. Zico Kolter and Andrew Y. Ng. 2009. Regularization and Feature Selection in Least-Squares Temporal Difference Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) . 521-528.
- Yann Lecun, L´ eon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio, and Patrick Haffner. 1998. Gradientbased Learning Applied to Document Recognition. IEEE 86, 11 (1998), 2278-2324.
- Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, and Trevor Darrell. 2015. Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) . 3431-3440.
- Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A. Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G. Bellemare, Alex Graves, Martin A. Riedmiller, Andreas Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, Stig Petersen, Charles Beattie, Amir Sadik, Ioannis Antonoglou, Helen King, Dharshan Kumaran, Daan Wierstra, Shane Legg, and Demis Hassabis. 2015. Human-Level Control through Deep Reinforcement Learning. Nature 518, 7540 (2015), 529-533.
- Lili Mou, Zhao Meng, Rui Yan, Ge Li, Yan Xu, Lu Zhang, and Zhi Jin. 2016. How Transferable are Neural Networks in NLP Applications?. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) . 479-489.
- Alex Nichol, Joshua Achiam, and John Schulman. 2018a. On First-Order MetaLearning Algorithms. CoRR abs/1803.02999 (2018). · arXiv
- Alex Nichol, Vicki Pfau, Christopher Hesse, Oleg Klimov, and John Schulman. 2018b. Gotta Learn Fast: A New Benchmark for Generalization in RL. CoRR abs/1804.03720 (2018). · arXiv
- Emilio Parisotto, Lei Jimmy Ba, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2016. Actor-Mimic: Deep Multitask and Transfer Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) .
- Aravind Rajeswaran, Kendall Lowrey, Emanuel Todorov, and Sham M. Kakade. 2017. Towards Generalization and Simplicity in Continuous Control. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) . 6550-6561.
- Ali Sharif Razavian, Hossein Azizpour, Josephine Sullivan, and Stefan Carlsson. 2014. CNN Features Off-the-Shelf: An Astounding Baseline for Recognition. In Workshops of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) . 512-519.
- Andrei A. Rusu, Neil C. Rabinowitz, Guillaume Desjardins, Hubert Soyer, James Kirkpatrick, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Razvan Pascanu, and Raia Hadsell. 2016. Progressive Neural Networks. CoRR abs/1606.04671 (2016). · arXiv
- Jonathan Schwarz, Wojciech Czarnecki, Jelena Luketina, Agnieszka GrabskaBarwinska, Yee Whye Teh, Razvan Pascanu, and Raia Hadsell. 2018. Progress & Compress: A Scalable Framework for Continual Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) . 4535-4544.
- David Silver, Aja Huang, Chris J. Maddison, Arthur Guez, Laurent Sifre, George van den Driessche, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Vedavyas Panneershelvam, Marc Lanctot, Sander Dieleman, Dominik Grewe, John Nham, Nal Kalchbrenner, Ilya Sutskever, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Madeleine Leach, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Thore Graepel, and Demis Hassabis. 2016. Mastering the Game of Go with Deep Neural Networks and Tree Search. Nature 529, 7587 (2016), 484-489.
- Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: a Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15, 1 (2014), 1929-1958.
- Richard S. Sutton. 1995. Generalization in Reinforcement Learning: Successful Examples Using Sparse Coarse Coding. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) . 1038-1044.
- Yee Whye Teh, Victor Bapst, Wojciech M. Czarnecki, John Quan, James Kirkpatrick, Raia Hadsell, Nicolas Heess, and Razvan Pascanu. 2017. Distral: Robust Multitask Reinforcement Learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) . 4496-4506.
- Sam Witty, Jun Ki Lee, Emma Tosch, Akanksha Atrey, Michael L. Littman, and David D. Jensen. 2018. Measuring and Characterizing Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning. CoRR abs/1812.02868 (2018). · arXiv
- Amy Zhang, Nicolas Ballas, and Joelle Pineau. 2018a. A Dissection of Overfitting and Generalization in Continuous Reinforcement Learning. CoRR abs/1806.07937 (2018). · arXiv
- Chiyuan Zhang, Oriol Vinyals, R´ emi Munos, and Samy Bengio. 2018b. A Study on Overfitting in Deep Reinforcement Learning. CoRR abs/1804.06893 (2018). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–194 of 194
Loss of Plasticity in Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning
Abbas, Z., Zhao, R., Modayil, J., White, A., & Machado, M. C. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.07507 · Cited by 10
“…loss of plasticity in a performant deep reinforcement learning system, Rainbow (Hessel et al., 2018), on a variation of the Arcade Learning Environment (ALE) (Bellemare et al., 2013; Machado et al., 2018) that involves non-stationarities from changing Atari 2600 games and game modes over time.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationUnified Emulation-Simulation Training Environment for Autonomous Cyber Agents
Li, L., Rami, J.-P. S. E., Taylor, A., Rao, J. H., & Kunz, T. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.01244 · Cited by 10
Policy Evaluation in Decentralized POMDPs With Belief Sharing
Kayaalp, M., Ghadieh, F., & Sayed, A. H. (2023) · IEEE Open Journal of Control Systems · doi:10.1109/ojcsys.2023.3277760 · Cited by 10
“However, recent work [64], [65] suggests that regularization can increase generalization and sample-efficiency in function approximation with over-parameterized models.”
BackgroundJoint Attention for Multi-Agent Coordination and Social LearningPreprint
Lee, D. M., Jaques, N., Kew, J. C., Wu, J., Eck, D., Schuurmans, D., & Faust, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.07750 · Cited by 9
“We are interested in assessing the generalization of our algorithm, because deep RL techniques often fail to generalize to even slight modifications of the training environment [55], [56], [57].”
Dissecting Deep RL with High Update Ratios: Combatting Value Overestimation and DivergencePreprint
Hussing, M., Voelcker, C. A., Gilitschenski, I., Farahmand, A.-M., & Eaton, E. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.05996 · Cited by 9
“Regularization is a common way to mitigate gradient explosion and is often used to address over-estimation (Farebrother et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021; Hiraoka et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023).”
BackgroundLim, H.-D., & Lee, D. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.10865 · Cited by 8
“Nonetheless, the interpretation is more complex when Φ ̸ = I , and algorithms to sovle (3) has been widely used in practice (Farebrother et al., 2018; Cobbe et al., 2019).”
Memory-Augmented Lyapunov-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning: End-to-End Safety Under Uncertainty
Jeddi, A. B., Dehghani, N. L., & Shafieezadeh, A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2023.3238700 · Cited by 8
“In either case, RL algorithms have shown to respond poorly to real-world deployments due to their failure to generalize over the training data [28], [29].”
BackgroundBridging the Gap Between Target Networks and Functional Regularization
Piché, A., Thomas, V., Marino, J., Pardinas, R., Marconi, G. M., Pal, C., & Khan, M. E. (2021) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.12282 · Cited by 8
“Other works have sought to stabilize the Q -value estimates by constraining parameter updates, e.g., through regularization (Farebrother et al., 2018), conjugate gradient methods (Schulman et al., 2015b), pre-conditioning the gradient updates (Knight & Lerner, 2018; Achiam et al., 2019), or using…”
MethodGrid-to-Graph: Flexible Spatial Relational Inductive Biases for Reinforcement Learning
Jiang, Z., Minervini, P., Jiang, M., & Rocktäschel, T. (2021) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.04220 · Cited by 8
“However, developing agents that can systematically generalize to out-of-distribution observations remains an open challenge [3, 9, 35].”
BackgroundA Brief Look at Generalization in Visual Meta-Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Alver, S., & Precup, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07262 · Cited by 5
“Due to the realization that training and testing RL agents in the same environments can prevent the detection of overfitting, there have been a variety of generalization studies where RL agents are evaluated on different environments (mostly different levels and modes of a single game) than those on which they are tra…”
BackgroundInfluentialFeature-Attending Recurrent Modules for Generalization in Reinforcement Learning
Carvalho, W., Lampinen, A. K., Nikiforou, K., Hill, F., & Shanahan, M. (2023) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.08369 · Cited by 8
Look where you look! Saliency-guided Q-networks for visual RL tasks
Bertoin, D., Zouitine, A., Zouitine, M., & Rachelson, E. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.09203 · Cited by 8
“Farebrother et al. [2018], Cobbe et al. [2019, 2020] demonstrated the beneficial effects of popular regularization methods from the supervised learning literature.”
BackgroundInfluentialTime Matters in Using Data Augmentation for Vision-based Deep Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Ko, B., & Ok, J. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.08581 · Cited by 8
“…for SL such as convolutional neural network, weight decay, batch normalization, dropout and self-supervised learning improve deep RL [16, 6, 22, 8, 30, 34, 13], a thorough study should be conducted before introducing a method from different learning frameworks, because we find the contrasting…”
MethodZero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Under Partial ObservabilityPreprint
Jeen, S., Bewley, T., & Cullen, J. M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.15446 · Cited by 5
“Generalisation can be improved via regularisation (Farebrother et al., 2018), data augmentation (Tobin et al., 2017; Raileanu et al., 2020; Ball et al., 2021), or dynamics context modelling (Seo et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2020).”
Mitigating Information Loss in Tree-Based Reinforcement Learning via Direct Optimization
Marton, S., Grams, T., Vogt, F., Ludtke, S., Bartelt, C., & Stuckenschmidt, H. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.08761 · Cited by 7
“For instance, NNs were shown to systematically misgeneralize on Atari environments (Farebrother et al., 2018; Delfosse et al., 2024a).”
Design Principles for Model Generalization and Scalable AI Integration in Radio Access Networks
Soldati, P., Ghadimi, E., Demi̇rel, B., Wang, Y., Gaigalas, R., & Sintorn, M. (2024) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.001.2300812 · Cited by 10
“In this context, model generalization can be rephrased as the ability of an agent to effectively apply the learned knowledge and policies to novel environments or tasks unseen during training; see, e.g., [5]–[8].”
BackgroundGriddlyJS: A Web IDE for Reinforcement Learning
Bamford, C., Jiang, M., Samvelyan, M., & Rocktäschel, T. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.06105 · Cited by 7
“PCG has enabled many findings on RL robustness and generalization, including the important, preliminary result that RL methods easily overfit to singleton environments [20, 39, 65].”
Reasoning and Generalization in RL: A Tool Use PerspectivePreprint
Wenke, S., Saunders, D., Qiu, M., & Fleming, J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.02050 · Cited by 4
“For example, the introduction of different modes of emulated Atari 2600 games allowed for agents to be trained in one environment while being evaluated in slightly ones [28].”
Generalization in Reinforcement Learning for Radio Access Networks
Demi̇rel, B., Wang, Y., Tatino, C., & Soldati, P. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tmlcn.2026.3655335 · Cited by 10
“However, several studies [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] have highlighted the limited generalization ability of RL agents to transfer learned knowledge to novel environments.”
Grando, R., Steinmetz, R., Kich, V. A., Kolling, A. H., Furik, P. M., de Jesus, J. C., Guterres, B., Gamarra, D. F. T., Guerra, R., & Drews, L. (2024) · 2024 IEEE 20th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) · doi:10.1109/case59546.2024.10711561 · Cited by 6
“Building on this understanding, Farebrother et al. [20] also tackled the challenge of overfitting in DRL, focusing on DQN models applied to Atari 2600 games.”
MethodGeneralization in Visual Reinforcement Learning with the Reward Sequence Distribution
Wang, J., Yang, R., Geng, Z., Shi, Z.-H., Ye, M., Zhou, Q., Ji, S., Li, B., Zhang, Y., & Wu, F. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.09601 · Cited by 6
“Each checkpoint in Figures 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 are evaluated by 10 episodes on unseen test environments.”
BackgroundProbing Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning without Task Engineering
Rusu, A. A., Flennerhag, S., Rao, D., Pascanu, R., & Hadsell, R. (2022) · CoLLAs · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.12448 · Cited by 6
“Please note that we are the first to report Rainbow-IQN results on Atari variants, and hence we had only the DQN experiments of Farebrother et al. (2018) as a guide, but no results were reported for the standard 200 million steps training regime, and the two algorithms have many differences which…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEfficient Scheduling of Data Augmentation for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Ko, B., & Ok, J. (2021) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.00518 · Cited by 6
“…for SL such as convolutional neural network, weight decay, batch normalization, dropout and self-supervised learning improve deep RL [16, 6, 22, 8, 30, 34, 13], a thorough study should be conducted before introducing a method from different learning frameworks, because we find the contrasting…”
MethodTowards a practical measure of interference for reinforcement learningPreprint
Liu, V., White, A., Yao, H.-S., & White, M. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.03807 · Cited by 6
“Several papers have investigated generalization and transfer in RL [7, 10, 26, 27], demonstrating that learning on new environments results in drops in performance on previously learned environments [7], or re-initialization can help a plateaued agent make further progress [11].”
BackgroundCALE: Continuous Arcade Learning Environment
Farebrother, J., & Castro, P. S. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.23810 · Cited by 5
“…one of the most popular benchmarks for evaluating RL agents, the ALE has also evolved with new extensions, including stochastic transitions [Machado et al., 2018], various game modes and difficulties [Machado et al., 2018, Farebrother et al., 2018], and multi-player support [Terry and Black, 2020].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationTowards Generalizable Reinforcement Learning via Causality-Guided Self-Adaptive RepresentationsPreprint
Yang, Y., Huang, B.-W., Feng, F., Wang, X.-Y., Tu, S.-K., & Xu, L. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.20651 · Cited by 5
Investigating Pre-Training Objectives for Generalization in Vision-Based Reinforcement Learning
Kim, D., Lee, H., Lee, K., Hwang, D., & Choo, J. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.06037 · Cited by 5
“This dataset encompasses training logs from a DQN agent’s experiences across 60 Atari games (Bellemare et al., 2013; Machado et al., 2018), documented over five distinct runs.”
InfluentialLanier, M., Xu, Y., Jacobs, N., Zhang, C., & Vorobeychik, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00048 · Cited by 1
“When these models err it is impossible to know whether the models have not learned useful representations, or they have not learned good policies with respect to those representations.”
Multi-armed bandit approach for multi-omics integration
Raj, A., & Mirzaei, G. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · doi:10.1109/bibm55620.2022.9995631 · Cited by 5
“…integration as a multi-armed bandit or the simplest RL problem (unlike deep RL models such as DQN which can suffer from robust overfitting [17], [18]) helps alleviate the issue of overfitting since here we learn to integrate the data indirectly through trial and error with the action and reward…”
BackgroundRahman, M. M., & Xue, Y.-X. (2022) · ECML/PKDD · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.07749 · Cited by 5
“Regularization has been used to improve RL generalization [10,7,20,17,32].”
MethodExploring and Exploiting Conditioning of Reinforcement Learning Agents
Asadulaev, A., Kuznetsov, I., Stein, G., & Filchenkov, A. A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3037276 · Cited by 9
“We need specific techniques to avoid overfitting of RL algorithms [2].”
MethodOffline Q-Learning on Diverse Multi-Task Data Both Scales And Generalizes
Kumar, A., Agarwal, R., Geng, X., Tucker, G., & Levine, S. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.15144 · Cited by 4
“Following Farebrother et al. (2018), we use the same variants investigated in this prior work: B REAKOUT , H ERO , and F REEWAY , which we visualize in Figure 8 (left).”
MethodResultInfluentialUnsupervised Model-based Pre-training for Data-efficient Control from PixelsPreprint
Rajeswar, S., Mazzaglia, P., Verbelen, T., Piché, A., Dhoedt, B., Courville, A. C., & Lacoste, A. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.12016 · Cited by 4
“In transfer learning for RL, they have studied this problem, mainly with the objective of transferring from one environment to another (Farebrother et al., 2018; Sasso et al., 2022; van Driessel & Francois-Lavet, 2021).”
The Formalism-Implementation Gap in Reinforcement Learning Research
Castro, P. S. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.16175 · Cited by 4
“…proposals put forth by Bellemare et al. (2013), there have been a number of subsequent methodologies suggested by followup works (Agarwal et al., 2024; Machado et al., 2018; Patterson et al., 2024), as well as paper-specific evaluations, which can sometimes lead to inconsistencies in results.”
Zhu, L.-J., Cai, Y., Tong, K. W., Wu, S., Xiang, F.-T., Duan, Y., Hou, Y., Zhu, G.-Y., & Wu, E. Q. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2025.3570811 · Cited by 4
“In addition to the use of neural networks, DQN introduces two key innovations: experience replay and target network [47].”
Ain, Q. U., Javed, A., Malik, K. M., & Irtaza, A. (2024) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-024-20268-x · Cited by 7
“Generalization of deep Q-network DQN is proposed in [13], where regularization prevents overfitting to training data.”
Regularized Parameter Uncertainty for Improving Generalization in Reinforcement Learning
Moure, P., Cheng, L., Ott, J., Wang, Z., & Liu, S. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02247 · Cited by 4
“However, the downside of these methods is a potential destabilization of the training process, as the added variability can interfere with the agent’s ability to learn an effective policy [11].”
BackgroundInvestigating Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment
Oliveira, T. N. D., & Chaimowicz, L. (2023) · Brazilian Symposium on Computer Games and Digital Entertainment (SBGames) · doi:10.1145/3631085.3631229 · Cited by 5
“Farebrother et al. [4] investigated the DQN method and concluded that it tends to overfit the trained task.”
MethodAnalyzing the Sensitivity to Policy-Value Decoupling in Deep Reinforcement Learning Generalization
Nafi, N. M., Ali, R. F., & Hsu, W. W. Y. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn60899.2024.10651435 · Cited by 1
“A lot of emphasis in deep reinforcement learning has lately been placed on an agent’s ability to learn policies that are robust and generalizable [7], [10], [25].”
BackgroundDeep Reinforcement Learning-Based Fast Prediction of Strategies for Security Control
Li, Q., Yu, Y.-Q., Lin, T., Fu, X., Du, H., & Xu, X.-L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE 5th Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2) · doi:10.1109/ei252483.2021.9713426 · Cited by 4
“Objective function, namely, the loss function is defined by mean square error[10]: The partial derivative of the error function L(”
BackgroundOn The Transferability of Deep-Q Networks
Sabatelli, M., & Geurts, P. (2021) · ORBi (University of Liège) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.02639 · Cited by 5
“The closest research to the one presented in this work is certainly that of Farebrother et al. [2018] and Tyo and Lipton [2020], who also studied the generalization properties of Deep-Q Networks in a model-free DRL context.”
Policy-based Reinforcement Learning for Generalisation in Interactive Text-based Environments
Toledo, E., Buys, J., & Shock, J. P. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.88 · Cited by 4
“This is supported by evidence showing that DQN suffers from severe overfitting on training environments for Atari games (Farebrother et al., 2018b).”
Agapiou, J. P., Vezhnevets, A. S., Duéñez-Guzmán, E. A., Matyas, J., Mao, Y., Sunehag, P., Köster, R., Madhushani, U., Kopparapu, K., Comanescu, R., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.13746 · Cited by 3
“The key idea is to always measure generalization, just as it is in other parts of machine learning (Cobbe et al., 2019; Farebrother et al., 2018; Hastie et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2018).”
BackgroundGaussian enhanced deep reinforcement learning for USV navigation with scarce environmental priors
Wang, R.-H., Huang, Z., & Wu, X.-K. (2026) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.123655 · Cited by 3
Population-Level Analysis of Personalized Food Recommendation Using Reinforcement Learning
Tellechea, Y., Arrojo, M., Cejudo, A., & Martín, C. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14213770 · Cited by 1
“In this section, different RSs are explored with well-known reinforcement learning-based algorithms [62] to learn user preferences: MAB [63,64], SARSA [65], and Deep-Q Network (DQN) [66].”
Sparsity-Driven Plasticity in Multi-Task Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Todorov, A., Cardenas-Cartagena, J., Cunha, R. F., Zullich, M., & Sabatelli, M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.06871 · Cited by 1
“The former issue is a topic of interest within the transfer learning literature (Farebrother et al., 2020; Sabatelli & Geurts, 2021; Sasso et al., 2023; Zhu et al., 2023), while the latter is commonly referred to as plasticity loss (Nikishin et al., 2022; Lyle et al., 2023; Dohare et al., 2024).”
Reinforcement Learning for Aligning Laser Optics with Kinematic Mounts
Rakhmatulin, I., Risbridger, D., Carter, R. M., Esser, M. J. D., & Erden, M. (2024) · 2024 IEEE 20th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) · doi:10.1109/case59546.2024.10711626 · Cited by 3
“Importantly, DQN can learn to generalize observed states and actions, making it adaptable to variations in the alignment problem [13].”
BackgroundSynthesizing Programmatic Policy for Generalization within Task Domain
Wu, T., Shen, L., Dong, Z., Peng, X., & Zhao, W. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/577 · Cited by 1
“According to [Liu et al. , 2019; Farebrother et al. , 2018], it is claimed that L2 regularization can produce better results than entropy regularization, and L2 regularization can find a good balance point for model’s ability and generalization.”
ResultRAPID: Enabling fast online policy learning in dynamic public cloud environments
Penney, D., Li, B., Chen, L., Sydir, J. J., Drewek-Ossowicka, A., Illikkal, R., Tai, C., Iyer, R., & Herdrich, A. (2023) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126737 · Cited by 3
“discourage overfitting to any particular workload demand [79].”
BackgroundYu, L.-L., Huo, S., Li, K., & Wei, Y. (2022) · Italian National Conference on Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22020636 · Cited by 3
“Settings of CR-DRQN’s Network Layers and Neurons According to the design of the existing work [40] and the references [28,41,42], the number The numbers of neural network layers and neurons are crucial factors for the network training [39]. of network layers is set to 4–8, considering the input…”
MethodLearning robust driving policies without online exploration
Graves, D., Nguyen, N. M., Hassanzadeh, K., Jin, J., & Luo, J. (2021) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra48506.2021.9561450 · Cited by 1
“poorly on novel situations not seen during training [19], [20], [21], [22].”
BackgroundTemporal Difference Learning with Constrained Initial Representations
Lyu, J., Yang, J., Qiao, Z., Liu, R., Liu, Z.-Y., Ye, D., Lu, Z.-Q., & Li, X. (2026) · Information Sciences · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.11800 · Cited by 2
“…tricks (Ba et al., 2016; Gogianu et al., 2021; Bjorck et al., 2021; Bhatt et al., 2024; Lee et al., 2025a;b; Palenicek et al., 2025; Elsayed et al., 2024), dropout (Srivastava et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2021; Hiraoka et al., 2021), weight decay (Farebrother et al., 2018; Nauman et al., 2024), etc.”
Deep Reinforcement Learning via Object-Centric Attention
Blüml, J., Derstroff, C., Gregori, B., Dillies, E., Delfosse, Q., & Kersting, K. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.03024 · Cited by 2
“…and domain shifts remains a key challenge in RL. Deep RL agents trained on raw pixels often overfit to spurious correlations, leading to catastrophic failures under minor changes in color or object placement, particularly in Atari benchmarks (Farebrother et al., 2018; Delfosse et al., 2024a).”
Bayesian Source Identification With Dual Hierarchical Neural Networks for Urban Air Pollution
Aawar, E. A., Resifi, S., Jebari, H., & Hoteit, I. (2025) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2024ms004790 · Cited by 2
“The choice of the L 2 regularization is motivated by its effectiveness in promoting generalization, and in preserving feature importance (Emmert‐Streib & Dehmer, 2019; Farebrother et al., 2018).”
Representation Convergence: Mutual Distillation is Secretly a Form of RegularizationPreprint
Xie, Z., Cao, J., Wang, C., Yang, F., Hutter, M., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J., & Xu, R. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02481 · Cited by 2
“…to avoid the overfitting problem in deep reinforcement learning is to apply regularization techniques originally developed for supervised learning such as dropout [42, 11, 17], data augmentation [22, 48, 52, 34, 26], domain randomization [43, 50, 40, 27], or network randomization technique [24].”
Nafi, N. M., Ali, R. F., Hsu, W. H., Duong, K., & Vick, M. (2024) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.5555/3635637.3663002 · Cited by 2
“In RL, this manifests into agents learning training trajectories and being unable to generalize well, not only to unseen states but also across environments [16, 39].”
BackgroundIntervention-Assisted Online Deep Reinforcement Learning for Stochastic Queuing Network Optimization
Wigmore, J., Shrader, B., & Modiano, E. (2024) · ACM International Symposium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, and Protocol Design for Mobile Networks and Mobile Computing (MobiHoc) · doi:10.1145/3641512.3686383 · Cited by 2
NEAT Wings: Algorithmic Strategy for Intelligent Flappy Bird Navigation
Jogekar, R., Kadu, M., Patel, B., Rai, J. K., Kawale, T., Sapolia, K., & Thakur, P. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Students' Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS) · doi:10.1109/sceecs61402.2024.10482169 · Cited by 2
“[7] ● Learning from Scratch: The AI agent starts with minimal knowledge about the game and learns from scratch.”
BackgroundTowards Autonomous Cyber Operation Agents: Exploring the Red Case
Li, L., Rami, J.-P. S. E., Kerr, R., Taylor, A., & Vandenberghe, G. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.02247 · Cited by 2
“Running the CyGIL library for CyGIL-E and CyGIL-S, and the agent training algorithm, the DL laptop is connected to the emulated network using the VMware REST API over an Ethernet connection [8].”
MethodPolicy Optimization with Augmented Value Targets for Generalization in Reinforcement Learning
Nafi, N. M., Poggi-Corradini, G., & Hsu, W. W. Y. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191507 · Cited by 1
“R ELATED W ORKS Recent work has suggested that lack of generalization is an endemic issue in deep reinforcement learning, with state-of-the-art algorithms tending to overfit to the environment, thus leading to models that simply memorize surface-level aspects of the environment [5], [8], [21].”
BackgroundEvaluating Generalisation in General Video Game Playing
Balla, M., Lucas, S. M., & Pérez-Liébana, D. (2020) · IEEE Conference on Games (CoG) · doi:10.1109/cog47356.2020.9231530 · Cited by 3
“[17] used DQN to learn policies in ALE and evaluated how they generalize to modified version of the games.”
Moulin, O., François-Lavet, V., Elbers, P., & Hoogendoorn, M. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.06550 · Cited by 2
A Study of Global and Episodic Bonuses for Exploration in Contextual MDPs
Henaff, M., Jiang, M., & Raileanu, R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.03236 · Cited by 1
“…singleton MDPs exhibit poor generalization, and that even minor changes to the environment can cause substantial degradation in agent performance (Justesen et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018a;b; Packer et al., 2018; Farebrother et al., 2018; Cobbe et al., 2019; Song et al., 2020; Kirk et al., 2021a).”
BackgroundBoosting deep Reinforcement Learning using pretraining with Logical Options
Ye, Z., Chau, P., Emunds, R., Blüml, J., Derstroff, C., Delfosse, Q., Arenz, O., & Kersting, K. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.06565 · Cited by 1
“To address the fragility of reward-driven agents, current mitigation strategies typically frame robustness as one of their goals (Pinto et al., 2017; Farebrother et al., 2018; Delfosse et al., 2025).”
On The Presence of Double-Descent in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Veselý, V., Todorov, A., & Sabatelli, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.06895 · Cited by 1
“This phenomenon is particularly interesting to study because of its practical implications: DRL agents currently suffer from poor generalization [4], exhibit a loss of plasticity [5], and rarely transfer well between tasks [6].”
Learning Distinguishable Representations in Deep Q-Networks for Linear Transfer
Sathish, S., Goyal, K., & Diddigi, R. B. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/ictai66417.2025.00029 · Cited by 1
“Unfortunately, deep neural networks are prone to overfitting [3], which can lead to highly correlated state representations.”
Bidirectional Distillation: A Mixed-Play Framework for Multi-Agent Generalizable Behaviors
Feng, L., Lin, J., Xing, D., Zhang, L., Ma, D., & Pan, G. (2025) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.11100 · Cited by 1
Significance extraction based on data augmentation for reinforcement learning
Han, Y., Li, D., & Yang, Y. (2025) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.2400406 · Cited by 1
“Although RL algorithms have achieved signifi-cant success in solving complex tasks, they tend to overfit the training environment (Farebrother et al., 2018; Cobbe et al., 2019), leading to performance deterioration in new environments and presenting significant deficiencies in generalization (Kirk et…”
Generalization Enhancement of Visual Reinforcement Learning through Internal States
Yang, H., Zhu, W., & Zhu, X. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24144513
“Despite the numerous advantages of this approach and the significant progress achieved, it is still very challenging for vision-based agents to generalize their abilities to unseen environments [12–15].”
BackgroundDetecting Malicious Websites by using Deep Q-Networks
Nguyen, K., & Park, Y. (2024) · Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Conference · doi:10.1109/svcc61185.2024.10637358 · Cited by 1
Neural Distillation as a State Representation Bottleneck in Reinforcement Learning
Guillet, V., Wilson, D. G., Aguilar-Melchor, C., & Rachelson, E. (2022) · CoLLAs · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.02224 · Cited by 1
“…policies for a wide variety of difficult tasks, many studies have highlighted the limited ability of RL agents to generalize to variations of such tasks that would appear easy to a human being (Farebrother et al., 2018; Packer et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Song et al., 2020; Cobbe et al., 2019).”
Methodical Advice Collection and Reuse in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Sahir, Ilhan, E., Das, S., & Taylor, M. E. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.07254 · Cited by 1
“Unless there is a generalisation goal, simply adding a dropout layer in an RL agent can potentially hurt the performance of the learning agent due to the introduction of extra variance that is already plentiful in RL [9].”
BackgroundAn Empirical Investigation of Transfer Effects for Reinforcement Learning
Jwo, J., Lin, C.-S., Lee, C., & Lo, Y.-C. (2020) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2020/8873057
“A combination of the convolutional neural network (CNN) [6] and Q-learning called deep Q-networks (DQN) [7, 8] is proposed to handle large state-action space.”
BackgroundEfficient decorrelation of features using Gramian in Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Mavrin, B., Graves, D., & Chan, A. (2019) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.08610 · Cited by 1
“While some work has been done on studying and improving generalization by regular-izing features in RL (Farebrother, Machado, and Bowling 2018), very little work has been done on disentangling factors of variance in RL in an online setting.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPreventing Value Function Collapse in Ensemble {Q}-Learning by Maximizing Representation Diversity
Sheikh, H., & Bölöni, L. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.13823
“For example, [24] studied the effect of L 2 norm on DQN on generalization, [25] studied generalization between simulations vs. the real world, [26] studied parameter variations and [27] studied the effect of different random seeds in environment generation.”
BackgroundBridging Performance and Generalization in Reinforcement Learning for Agile FlightPreprint
Green, J., Xing, J., Messikommer, N., Romero, A., & Scaramuzza, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.27348
Multi-Agent Attention Transformer for Robust Encirclement Under Communication Interference
Ji, B.-Y., Wu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Chinese Control and Decision Conference · doi:10.1109/ccdc69976.2026.11560352
“While zero-padding can compensate for reduced observation dimensions [16], increasing dimensionality necessitates retraining the model to accommodate the new input structure, thereby increasing the cost of system scaling.”
Hierarchical Successor Representation for Robust Transfer
Yu, C., & Lengyel, M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.12753
“These approaches largely focus on enforcing robustness via novel regularisation and optimisation objectives (Farebrother et al., 2018; Cobbe et al., 2019; Igl et al., 2019), or by artificially expanding the diversity of training distributions through data mixing (Wang et al., 2020) and augmentation…”
Zero-shot reinforcement learning for multi-domain task-oriented dialogue policy
Ren, Y., Chen, S., Zhang, R.-C., Liu, X., & Ming-tian, P. E. N. G. (2026) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-025-41285-5
“Several works focused on the euclidean-state-space generalization [27–29], Meta-learning [30], as well as task generalization [31,32].”
Lim, M. C., & Choi, H. (2025) · International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · doi:10.1177/17298806251332359
“Regularization and dropout 17,18 were also applied to neural models to reduce over fi tting to training environments.”
A Research Agenda for Usability and Generalisation in Reinforcement Learning
Soemers, D. J. N. J., Samothrakis, S., Driessens, K., & Winands, M. H. M. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-25032-2_33
“A popular category of RL research with a higher degree of generalisation involves training agents on a subset of one or more closely-related environments, and evaluating them in the same set, or a different set of similar environments [164,77,39,19,32,38,62,104,26,25,149,94].”
SNN-Based Online Learning of Concepts and Action Laws in an Open World
Grimaud, C., Longin, D., & Herzig, A. (2024) · The European Journal on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1177/30504554251394337
“…have been developed, which all have in common that the agent learns through trials and errors by means of a reward system, and that what is finally learned is a policy , i.e., a function which takes a given state of the agent as an argument and returns an action (or a set of actions) to be taken.”
Curricula for Learning Robust Policies with Factored State Representations in Changing Environments
Panayiotou, P. N., & Şimşek, Ö. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.09169
“This lack of emphasis contributes to some of the central challenges in reinforcement learning, including weak transferability between tasks and the brittleness of policies to small changes in environments or random seeds [32, 8, 14, 27].”
BackgroundChen, Y., Fang, M., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · International Conferences on Computers, Information Processing and Advanced Education · doi:10.1109/cipae64326.2024.00014
Massively Multiagent Minigames for Training Generalist AgentsPreprint
Choe, K. W., Sullivan, R. J., & Suárez, J. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.05071 · Cited by 1
“This line of work evaluates generalization using sticky actions [29] or by using Atari games with different modes [13].”
MethodFranceschelli, G., & Musolesi, M. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.07979
“Another is to adopt techniques used in supervised learning to avoid overfitting, e.g., dropout, batch normalization, and specific convolutional architectures (Cobbe et al., 2019; Farebrother et al., 2018; Igl et al., 2019).”
MethodSolving Robust MDPs through No-Regret DynamicsPreprint
Guha, E. K. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.19035
“When a trained policy operates in different environmental dynamics than it was trained under, it often underperforms and achieves suboptimal rewards [Farebrother et al., 2018, Packer et al., 2018, Cobbe et al., 2018, Song et al., 2019, Raileanu and Fergus, 2021].”
BackgroundAdversarial Discriminative Feature Separation for Generalization in Reinforcement Learning
Liu, Y. K., Wu, C., Xi, X., Li, Y., Cao, G., Cao, W., & Wang, H. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892539
“Motivated by this, regularization methods also used to imporve the generalization in Deep RL, which consist of using dropout and l 2 -regularisation [11] in Deep Q Network (DQN) [26], using batch normalization in CoinRun environment [7].”
BackgroundMethodMoulin, O., Vincent-Lavet, F., Elbers, P., & Hoogendoorn, M. (2022) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) · doi:10.1109/wi-iat55865.2022.00032 · Cited by 1
Akrout, M., Feriani, A., & Mcleod, B. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.14076
“…the tremendous success of RL in a myriad of applications, the learned policies have difficulty generalizing to new test environments, even when these environments are slightly different from the training ones (Farebrother et al. (2018); Zhang et al. (2018); Cobbe et al. (2019); Song et al. (2020)).”
BackgroundReinforcement learning in intelligent transportation systems: recent developments
Yu, Y., Wang, Q.-Q., Wang, Y.-K., & Kuai, J.-T. (2021) · Other Conferences · doi:10.1117/12.2613696
“Representative algorithms for value-based RL include Q-learning [7], SARSA [8], and the Deep Q-Network (DQN) algorithm combined with deep learning [9].”
MethodIn Hindsight: A Smooth Reward for Steady Exploration
Jomaa, H., Grabocka, J., & Schmidt-Thieme, L. (2019) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.09781
“, 2017] which preserves the original loss function, and l2-regularization [Farebrother et al., 2018] to avoid overfitting on the training environment.”
BackgroundBeyond Target Networks: Improving Deep Q-learning with Functional Regularization
Piché, A., Marino, J., Marconi, G. M., Pal, C., & Khan, M. E. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.02613
“Other works have sought to stabilize the Q -value estimates by constraining parameter updates, e.g., through regularization (Farebrother et al., 2018), conjugate gradient methods (Schulman et al., 2015b), pre-conditioning the gradient updates (Knight & Lerner, 2018; Achiam et al., 2019), or using…”
MethodEmergent Representations in Reinforcement Learning and Their Properties
Wang, H. (2020) · doi:10.7939/r3-1s8n-tm45
“Futhermore, there has been a substantial effort to characterize transfer, generalization, and overfitting in deep reinforcement learning, primarily in terms of performance [10], [14], [44], [51]—motivating the need for new domains and evaluation methodologies.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Farebrother, J., Machado, M. C., & Bowling, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1810.00123
- OpenAlex
- W2893662673
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Keywords
- deep Q-network, generalization, regularization, over-specialization, Atari 2600, dropout, Tikhonov regularization, fine-tuning, sample efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review