The DOI matches its DataCite record.
DeepImageSpam: Deep Learning based Image Spam Detection
Open accessAbstract
Hackers and spammers are employing innovative and novel techniques to deceive novice and even knowledgeable internet users. Image spam is one of such technique where the spammer varies and changes some portion of the image such that it is indistinguishable from the original image fooling the users. This paper proposes a deep learning based approach for image spam detection using the convolutional neural networks which uses a dataset with 810 natural images and 928 spam images for classification achieving an accuracy of 91.7% outperforming the existing image processing and machine learning techniques
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Kumar et al. (2018) confirm the CNN model achieves 91.7% accuracy, but only in a set environment.”
From Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as Kumar et al. (2018)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [1][1] S. Dhanaraj, V. Karthikeyani, A study on e-mail image spam filtering techniques, in: 2013 International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Informatics and Mobile Engineering, 2013, pp. 49-55. doi:10.1109/ICPRIME.2013.6496446 . - · DOI
- [2][2] B. Biggio, G. Fumera, I. Pillai, F. Roli, A survey and experimental evaluation of image spam filtering techniques, Pattern Recognition Letters 32 (10) (2011) 1436-1446. -
- [3][3] B. Biggio, G. Fumera, I. Pillai, F. Roli, A survey and experimental evaluation of image spam filtering techniques, Pattern Recognition Letters 32 (10) (2011) 1436 - 1446. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2011.03.022 . - · DOI
- [4][4] L. M. Ketari, M. Chandra, M. A. Khanum, A study of image spam filtering techniques, in: 2012 Fourth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, 2012, pp. 245-250. doi:10.1109/CICN.2012.34 . - · DOI
- [5][5] B. Mehta, S. Nangia, M. Gupta, W. Nejdl, Detecting image spam using visual features and near duplicate detection, in: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '08, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2008, pp. 497506. doi:10.1145/1367497.1367565 . [URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1367497.1367565](http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1367497.1367565) - · DOI
- [6][6] S. Krasser, Y. Tang, J. Gould, D. Alperovitch, P. Judge, Identifying image spam based on header and file properties using c4. 5 decision trees and support vector machine learning, in: Information Assurance and Security Workshop, 2007. IAW'07. IEEE SMC, IEEE, 2007, pp. 255-261. -
- [7][7] R. Vinayakumar, K. P. Soman, P. Poornachandran, Applying convolutional neural network for network intrusion detection, in: 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), 2017, pp. 12221228. doi:10.1109/ICACCI.2017.8126009 . - · DOI
- [8][8] R. Vinayakumar, P. Poornachandran, K. P. Soman, Scalable Framework for Cyber Threat Situational Awareness Based on Domain Name Systems Data Analysis, Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2018, pp. 113-142. -
- [9][9] Y. Gao, M. Yang, X. Zhao, B. Pardo, Y. Wu, T. N. Pappas, A. Choudhary, Image spam hunter, in: Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2008. ICASSP 2008. IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 2008, pp. 1765-1768. -
- [10][10] A. D. Kumar, Novel deep learning model for tra c sign detection using capsule networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.04424. · arXiv
Cited by
Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities
Kaur, A., Noori Hoshyar, A., Saikrishna, V., Firmin, S., & Xia, F. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10810-6 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, A. D., R, V., & KP, S.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1810.03977
- OpenAlex
- W2896081746
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2018: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- image forgery detection, deep learning, convolutional neural networks, image classification, spam images, image forensics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DeepImageSpam: Deep Learning based Image Spam Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1810.03977
- The paper
- Kumar, A. D., R, V., & KP, S. (2018). DeepImageSpam: Deep Learning based Image Spam Detection. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1810.03977
