PreprintCited by 852Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization AlgorithmsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimization

Open access
Sener, Ozan, Koltun, Vladlen·2018·arXiv

Abstract

In multi-task learning, multiple tasks are solved jointly, sharing inductive bias between them. Multi-task learning is inherently a multi-objective problem because different tasks may conflict, necessitating a trade-off. A common compromise is to optimize a proxy objective that minimizes a weighted linear combination of per-task losses. However, this workaround is only valid when the tasks do not compete, which is rarely the case. In this paper, we explicitly cast multi-task learning as multi-objective optimization, with the overall objective of finding a Pareto optimal solution. To this end, we use algorithms developed in the gradient-based multi-objective optimization literature. These algorithms are not directly applicable to large-scale learning problems since they scale poorly with the dimensionality of the gradients and the number of tasks. We therefore propose an upper bound for the multi-objective loss and show that it can be optimized efficiently. We further prove that optimizing this upper bound yields a Pareto optimal solution under realistic assumptions. We apply our method to a variety of multi-task deep learning problems including digit classification, scene understanding (joint semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, and depth estimation), and multi-label classification. Our method produces higher-performing models than recent multi-task learning formulations or per-task training.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1810.04650

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quantum speed-ups for different tasks can help in realizing various diverse types of applications of big data analytics.

    “The quantum speed-ups for different tasks (e.g., classification, learning, etc) can help in realizing various diverse types of applications of big data analytics, see e.g., [204].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sener, O., & Koltun, V.
Affiliations
Intel (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
Volume
31
Pages
527-538
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890538051
Cited by
852
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 175 · 2023: 143 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 180 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • TIB Data Manager
  • neural information processing systems
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
multi-task learning, multi-objective optimization, Pareto optimality, task conflict, inductive bias, instance segmentation, depth estimation, multi-label classification, digit classification, scene understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review