Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimization
Open accessAbstract
In multi-task learning, multiple tasks are solved jointly, sharing inductive bias between them. Multi-task learning is inherently a multi-objective problem because different tasks may conflict, necessitating a trade-off. A common compromise is to optimize a proxy objective that minimizes a weighted linear combination of per-task losses. However, this workaround is only valid when the tasks do not compete, which is rarely the case. In this paper, we explicitly cast multi-task learning as multi-objective optimization, with the overall objective of finding a Pareto optimal solution. To this end, we use algorithms developed in the gradient-based multi-objective optimization literature. These algorithms are not directly applicable to large-scale learning problems since they scale poorly with the dimensionality of the gradients and the number of tasks. We therefore propose an upper bound for the multi-objective loss and show that it can be optimized efficiently. We further prove that optimizing this upper bound yields a Pareto optimal solution under realistic assumptions. We apply our method to a variety of multi-task deep learning problems including digit classification, scene understanding (joint semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, and depth estimation), and multi-label classification. Our method produces higher-performing models than recent multi-task learning formulations or per-task training.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The quantum speed-ups for different tasks can help in realizing various diverse types of applications of big data analytics.
“The quantum speed-ups for different tasks (e.g., classification, learning, etc) can help in realizing various diverse types of applications of big data analytics, see e.g., [204].”
From Quantum Machine Learning for 6G Communication Networks: State-of-the-Art and Vision for the Future (2019) · cites this paper as [204]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vision Transformers for Dense Prediction
Ranftl, R., Bochkovskiy, A., & Koltun, V. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01196 · Cited by 2,373 · see citing works
“We use multi-objective optimization [34] together with Adam [20] and set a learning rate of 1e−5 for the backbone and 1e−4 for the decoder weights.”
MethodSelf-citationFairMOT: On the Fairness of Detection and Re-identification in Multiple Object Tracking
Zhang, Y., Wang, C., Wang, X., Zeng, W., & Liu, W. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-021-01513-4 · Cited by 1,861 · see citing works
Towards Real-Time Multi-Object Tracking
Wang, Z., Zheng, L., Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Wang, S. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58621-8_7 · Cited by 1,195 · see citing works
Quantum Machine Learning for 6G Communication Networks: State-of-the-Art and Vision for the Future
Nawaz, S. J., Sharma, S. K., Wyne, S., Patwary, M. N., & Asaduzzaman, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2909490 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
How to train your robot with deep reinforcement learning: Lessons we have learned
Ibarz, J., Tan, J., Finn, C., Kalakrishnan, M., Pastor, P., & Levine, S. (2021) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364920987859 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
AuxNet: Auxiliary Tasks Enhanced Semantic Segmentation for Automated Driving
Chennupati, S., Sistu, G., Yogamani, S., & Rawashdeh, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications · doi:10.5220/0007684106450652 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Sifting through the Chaff: On Utilizing Execution Feedback for Ranking the Generated Code Candidates
Sun, Z., Wan, Y., Li, J., Zhang, H., Jin, Z., Li, G., & Lyu, C. (2024) · Proceedings of the 39th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3691620.3695000 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Value-Consistent Representation Learning for Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning
Yue, Y., Kang, B., Xu, Z., Huang, G., & Yan, S. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.12542 · Cited by 4
“The above , which adopt the same form with n -step estimation of Q -learning to mitigate possible gradient conflict in multi-task learning(Sener and Koltun 2018; Yu et al. 2020; Jean, Firat, and Johnson 2019).”
Background
- Authors
- Sener, O., & Koltun, V.
- Affiliations
- Intel (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Koltun, Vladlen
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 31
- Pages
- 527-538
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1810.04650
- OpenAlex
- W2890538051
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 175 · 2023: 143 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 180 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- TIB Data Manager
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- multi-task learning, multi-objective optimization, Pareto optimality, task conflict, inductive bias, instance segmentation, depth estimation, multi-label classification, digit classification, scene understanding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review