Three Lectures on Complexity and Black Holes
Open accessAbstract
Given at PiTP 2018 summer program entitled "From Qubits to Spacetime." The first lecture describes the meaning of quantum complexity, the analogy between entropy and complexity, and the second law of complexity. Lecture two reviews the connection between the second law of complexity and the interior of black holes. I discuss how firewalls are related to periods of non-increasing complexity which typically only occur after an exponentially long time. The final lecture is about the thermodynamics of complexity, and "uncomplexity" as a resource for doing computational work. I explain the remarkable power of "one clean qubit," in both computational terms and in space-time terms. The lectures can also be found online at \url{https://static.ias.edu/pitp/2018/node/1796.html} .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Very complex operations on the radiation weave their own spacetime, which can develop a connection to the black hole interior.
“One way to understand this is that very complex operations on the radiation weave their own spacetime, and this spacetime can develop a connection to the black hole interior. See [88] for more discussion.”
From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [88]
Section 17.2 (p. 66) says that an Einstein–Rosen bridge connects the black hole to its radiation, and the lectures relate complexity to interior geometry. But our copy does not say that very complex operations performed on the radiation weave their own spacetime or cause that spacetime to connect to the interior. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 32
- Authors
- Susskind, L.
- Affiliations
- Instituto de Física Teórica (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Susskind, Leonard
- ORCID
- Susskind, Leonard
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1810.11563
- OpenAlex
- W4297046297
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
- Keywords
- quantum complexity, black holes, firewall, entropy (information theory), quantum computing, black hole interior, spacetime
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
